Suppr超能文献

两种基层医疗干预措施辅助长期苯二氮䓬类药物戒断的疗效比较:一项整群随机临床试验方案。

Comparative efficacy of two primary care interventions to assist withdrawal from long term benzodiazepine use: a protocol for a clustered, randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Son Serra- La Vileta Health Care Centre, Balearic Mental Health Research Group, Balearic Health service-IbSalut, Mallorca, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Apr 20;12:23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although benzodiazepines are effective, long-term use is not recommended because of potential adverse effects; the risks of tolerance and dependence; and an increased risk of hip fractures, motor vehicle accidents, and memory impairment. The estimated prevalence of long-term benzodiazepine use in the general population is about 2,2 to 2,6%, is higher in women and increases steadily with age. Interventions performed by General Practitioners may help patients to discontinue long-term benzodiazepine use. We have designed a trial to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two brief general practitioner-provided interventions, based on gradual dose reduction, and will compare the effectiveness of these interventions with that of routine clinical practice.

METHODS/DESIGN: In a three-arm cluster randomized controlled trial, general practitioners will be randomly allocated to: a) a group in which the first patient visit will feature a structured interview, followed by visits every 2-3 weeks to the end of dose reduction; b) a group in which the first patient visit will feature a structured interview plus delivery of written instructions to self-reduce benzodiazepine dose, or c) routine care. Using a computerized pharmaceutical prescription database, 495 patients, aged 18-80 years, taking benzodiazepine for at least 6 months, will be recruited in primary care health districts of three regions of Spain (the Balearic Islands, Catalonia, and Valencia). The primary outcome will be benzodiazepine use at 12 months. The secondary outcomes will include measurements of anxiety and depression symptoms, benzodiazepine dependence, quality of sleep, and alcohol consumption.

DISCUSSION

Although some interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing benzodiazepine consumption by long-term users, the clinical relevance of such interventions is limited by their complexity. This randomized trial will compare the effectiveness and safety of two complex stepped care interventions with that of routine care in a study with sufficient statistical power to detect clinically relevant differences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN13024375.

摘要

背景

尽管苯二氮䓬类药物有效,但由于潜在的不良反应、耐受和依赖的风险增加以及髋部骨折、机动车事故和记忆障碍风险增加,不建议长期使用;一般人群中长期使用苯二氮䓬类药物的估计患病率约为 2.2%至 2.6%,女性患病率较高,且随年龄增长稳步上升。全科医生实施的干预措施可能有助于患者停止长期使用苯二氮䓬类药物。我们设计了一项试验,以评估基于逐渐减少剂量的两种由全科医生提供的简短干预措施的有效性和安全性,并将这些干预措施与常规临床实践的效果进行比较。

方法/设计:在一项三臂聚类随机对照试验中,全科医生将被随机分配到以下三组:a)第一就诊时进行结构化访谈,然后每 2-3 周就诊一次,直至减药结束;b)第一就诊时进行结构化访谈,外加书面指导患者自行减少苯二氮䓬类药物剂量;或 c)常规护理。使用计算机化的药物处方数据库,在西班牙三个地区(巴利阿里群岛、加泰罗尼亚和瓦伦西亚)的基层医疗保健区招募年龄在 18-80 岁之间、服用苯二氮䓬类药物至少 6 个月的 495 名患者。主要结局为 12 个月时的苯二氮䓬类药物使用情况。次要结局包括焦虑和抑郁症状、苯二氮䓬类药物依赖、睡眠质量和饮酒量的测量。

讨论

尽管一些干预措施已被证明可有效减少长期使用者的苯二氮䓬类药物用量,但这些干预措施的临床相关性受到其复杂性的限制。这项随机试验将比较两种复杂的阶梯式护理干预措施与常规护理的有效性和安全性,该研究具有足够的统计效力来检测有临床意义的差异。

试验注册

当前对照试验:ISRCTN85207535。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/693d/3105938/534622242559/1471-2296-12-23-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验