Center for Sports Rehabilitation, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedics Institute, Milan, Italy.
Clin Rehabil. 2011 Aug;25(8):731-9. doi: 10.1177/0269215510396740. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
To generate data on optimal shoulder position comparing two ultrasound-guided extracorporeal shock wave therapy techniques for the treatment of calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder.
Random assignment to two groups of treatment with three months follow-up.
The data were collected in outpatients.
Thirty-five subjects affected by calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder were examined.
Each subject received three sessions of ultrasound-guided extracorporeal shock wave therapy (performed weekly). Neutral position technique was used in group A (n = 17, mean age 53 ± 9.2 years) and the hyperextended internal rotation technique was used in group B (n = 18, mean age 52.2 ± 10.8 years).
The Constant and Murley method and radiographs were used to evaluate each subject before the treatment and at three months follow-up.
There were no significant differences between changes in Constant total score and pain, activity of daily living and range of motion subscales of the two groups. Only the pain subscale showed a significant difference in favour of group B. Significant differences in the radiographic outcome were observed between the two groups: the percentage of total or subtotal resorption of the calcified deposits was 35.3% in group A (neutral position technique) versus 66.6% in group B (hyperextended internal rotation technique). The resorption of the calcific deposit positively influenced the clinical outcome.
Positioning the shoulder in hyperextension and internal rotation during extracorporeal shock wave therapy seems to be a useful technique to achieve resorption of calcific deposits.
比较两种超声引导体外冲击波治疗技术治疗肩钙化性肌腱炎的最佳肩部位置数据。
随机分为两组,每组接受三个月的随访治疗。
数据采集在门诊进行。
35 名患有肩钙化性肌腱炎的受试者接受了检查。
每位受试者接受三次超声引导体外冲击波治疗(每周一次)。A 组采用中立位技术(n=17,平均年龄 53±9.2 岁),B 组采用过度伸展内旋技术(n=18,平均年龄 52.2±10.8 岁)。
采用 Constant 和 Murley 方法和 X 线片评估每位受试者治疗前和治疗后三个月的情况。
两组 Constant 总分和疼痛、日常生活活动和运动范围子量表的变化无显著差异。只有疼痛子量表显示 B 组有显著差异。两组的影像学结果存在显著差异:钙化沉积的完全或部分吸收百分比,A 组(中立位技术)为 35.3%,B 组(过度伸展内旋技术)为 66.6%。钙化沉积的吸收对临床结果有积极影响。
在体外冲击波治疗中使肩部处于伸展和内旋位似乎是一种促进钙化沉积吸收的有用技术。