• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[第二代药物洗脱支架:新,但也具有成本效益?]

[Second-generation DES : New, but also cost-effective?].

作者信息

Müller-Riemenschneider F, Reinhold T, Willich S N

机构信息

Institut für Sozialmedizin, Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsökonomie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Deutschland.

出版信息

Herz. 2011 May;36(3):254-61. doi: 10.1007/s00059-011-3463-2.

DOI:10.1007/s00059-011-3463-2
PMID:21509580
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of the present review was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) compared to bare metal stents (BMS) as well as to first-generation DES.

METHODS

A structured literature review in MEDLINE was conducted to identify all studies investigating the cost-effectiveness of second-generation DES published up to December 2010. Pre-specified selection criteria were applied to identify relevant studies. Standardized data extraction was performed to summarize clinical, economic, and cost-effectiveness outcomes of these studies.

RESULTS

Of only five studies which met all selection criteria from the US, UK, and Spain, three investigated the cost-effectiveness of the zotarolimus-coated Endeavor stent (ZES) compared to BMS, and two studies the ZES with first-generation DES.

CONCLUSION

In summary, there is currently a lack of evidence with regard to the cost-effectiveness of second-generation DES, especially in Germany. However, studies from other countries provide some evidence that second-generation DES appear to generally not be cost-effective compared to BMS. Also, there is no conclusive evidence of cost-effectiveness compared to first-generation DES. Moreover, there are currently no studies investigating the cost-effectiveness of the Everolimus-coated Xience V stent. Methodologically rigorous economic evaluations addressing these issues within the context of the German health care system are therefore urgently required.

摘要

背景

本综述的目的是研究第二代药物洗脱支架(DES)与裸金属支架(BMS)以及第一代DES相比的成本效益。

方法

在MEDLINE上进行了结构化文献综述,以识别截至2010年12月发表的所有研究第二代DES成本效益的研究。应用预先指定的选择标准来识别相关研究。进行标准化数据提取以总结这些研究的临床、经济和成本效益结果。

结果

在美国、英国和西班牙仅有的五项符合所有选择标准的研究中,三项研究了佐他莫司涂层的安珂支架(ZES)与BMS相比的成本效益,两项研究了ZES与第一代DES相比的成本效益。

结论

总之,目前缺乏关于第二代DES成本效益的证据,尤其是在德国。然而,其他国家的研究提供了一些证据,表明与BMS相比,第二代DES似乎总体上不具有成本效益。此外,与第一代DES相比,也没有确凿的成本效益证据。此外,目前没有研究调查依维莫司涂层的Xience V支架的成本效益。因此,迫切需要在德国医疗保健系统的背景下进行方法严谨的经济评估来解决这些问题。

相似文献

1
[Second-generation DES : New, but also cost-effective?].[第二代药物洗脱支架:新,但也具有成本效益?]
Herz. 2011 May;36(3):254-61. doi: 10.1007/s00059-011-3463-2.
2
[Can PCI with drug-eluting stents replace coronary artery bypass surgery? A comparative economic analysis regarding both therapeutic options based on clinical 12-month data reflecting the German social health care insurance system].药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗能否取代冠状动脉搭桥手术?基于反映德国社会医疗保险系统的12个月临床数据对两种治疗方案进行的比较经济分析
Herz. 2005 Jun;30(4):332-8. doi: 10.1007/s00059-005-2694-5.
3
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents versus bare metal stents: Results from a patient level meta-analysis of randomized trials.钴铬依维莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的成本效益:来自随机试验患者水平荟萃分析的结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;89(6):994-1002. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26700. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
4
Impact of stent diameter and length on in-stent restenosis after DES vs BMS implantation in patients needing large coronary stents-A clinical and health-economic evaluation.在需要大型冠状动脉支架的患者中,药物洗脱支架(DES)与裸金属支架(BMS)植入后支架直径和长度对支架内再狭窄的影响——一项临床和卫生经济学评估
Cardiovasc Ther. 2017 Feb;35(1):19-25. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12229.
5
Second- and third-generation drug-eluting coronary stents: progress and safety.第二代和第三代药物洗脱冠状动脉支架:进展与安全性
Herz. 2011 May;36(3):190-6. doi: 10.1007/s00059-011-3458-z.
6
Contemporary Context of Drug-Eluting Stents in Brazil: A Cost Utility Study.巴西药物洗脱支架的当代背景:一项成本效用研究。
Med Decis Making. 2016 Nov;36(8):1034-42. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16636054. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
7
Short- and long-term outcomes with drug-eluting and bare-metal coronary stents: a mixed-treatment comparison analysis of 117 762 patient-years of follow-up from randomized trials.药物洗脱支架和金属裸支架的短期和长期结果:来自随机试验的 117762 患者年随访的混合治疗比较分析。
Circulation. 2012 Jun 12;125(23):2873-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.097014. Epub 2012 May 14.
8
Randomized comparison of cost-saving and effectiveness of oral rapamycin plus bare-metal stents with drug-eluting stents: three-year outcome from the randomized oral rapamycin in Argentina (ORAR) III trial.随机比较口服雷帕霉素加裸金属支架与药物洗脱支架的节省成本和效果:来自阿根廷随机口服雷帕霉素(ORAR)III 试验的三年结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Sep 1;80(3):385-94. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23352. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
9
Cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease.紫杉醇涂层球囊血管成形术和紫杉醇洗脱支架置入治疗稳定性冠心病患者冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的成本效果分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Jul;101(7):573-84. doi: 10.1007/s00392-012-0428-2. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
10
Cost-effectiveness of the Endeavor stent in de novo native coronary artery lesions updated with contemporary data.采用当代数据更新的新型 Endeavor 支架治疗初发原生冠状动脉病变的成本效益分析。
EuroIntervention. 2010 Feb;5(7):826-32. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i7a138.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中的成本效益分析
Open Heart. 2016 Aug 25;3(2):e000445. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000445. eCollection 2016.
2
Health economic evaluation of the use of drug-eluting stents : First results from the Drug-Eluting Stent Registry (DES.de).药物洗脱支架使用的卫生经济学评估:药物洗脱支架注册研究(DES.de)的初步结果
Herz. 2012 Feb 2. doi: 10.1007/s00059-012-3581-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in large coronary arteries.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架治疗大冠状动脉病变
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 9;363(24):2310-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009406. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
2
Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting stents with sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary revascularization: the ZEST (comparison of the efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting stent with sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stent for coronary lesions) randomized trial.比较冠状动脉血运重建中使用佐他莫司洗脱支架与西罗莫司和紫杉醇洗脱支架的疗效:ZEST(佐他莫司洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱及紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉病变的疗效和安全性比较)随机试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Oct 5;56(15):1187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.086.
3
Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.
心肌血运重建指南。
Eur Heart J. 2010 Oct;31(20):2501-55. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq277. Epub 2010 Aug 29.
4
Coronary stents: current status.冠状动脉支架:现状。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Aug 31;56(10 Suppl):S1-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.007.
5
Second-generation drug-eluting coronary stents.
N Engl J Med. 2010 May 6;362(18):1728-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1001069.
6
Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease.依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉疾病的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2010 May 6;362(18):1663-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0910496.
7
Efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting coronary stents in routine clinical care (SORT OUT III): a randomised controlled superiority trial.在常规临床护理中使用佐他莫司洗脱和西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架的疗效和安全性(SORT OUT III):一项随机对照优效性试验。
Lancet. 2010 Mar 27;375(9720):1090-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60208-5. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
8
Cost-effectiveness of the Endeavor stent in de novo native coronary artery lesions updated with contemporary data.采用当代数据更新的新型 Endeavor 支架治疗初发原生冠状动脉病变的成本效益分析。
EuroIntervention. 2010 Feb;5(7):826-32. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i7a138.
9
Second-generation drug-eluting stents and the continuous need for rapidly available real-world data.第二代药物洗脱支架以及对快速可得的真实世界数据的持续需求。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Dec;2(12):1236-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.010.
10
Late safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of a zotarolimus-eluting stent compared with a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions: 2-year follow-up from the ENDEAVOR IV trial (Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Taxus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).在新发冠状动脉病变患者中,与紫杉醇洗脱支架相比,依维莫司洗脱支架的安全性、疗效和成本效益:来自 ENDEAVOR IV 试验的 2 年随访结果(美敦力 Endeavor 药物[ABT-578]洗脱冠状动脉支架系统与紫杉醇洗脱 Taxus 冠状动脉支架系统在新发原生冠状动脉病变中的随机对照试验)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Dec;2(12):1208-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.008.