• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童替考拉宁治疗:综述

Teicoplanin therapy in children: a review.

作者信息

Bassetti D, Cruciani M

机构信息

Institute of Infectious Diseases, University of Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1990;72:35-7.

PMID:2151065
Abstract

Teicoplanin has been investigated mainly in adults and to a lesser extent in children. Pharmacological studies in children aged 2-12 years showed that a daily dose of 3-6 mg/kg of teicoplanin was insufficient to maintain microbiologically effective trough serum levels, while a regimen of 10 mg/kg/day was sufficient to obtain effective serum concentrations. Teicoplanin has been administered, alone or in combination therapy, to neutropenic or non-neutropenic paediatric patients. Combinations of teicoplanin (10 mg/kg/day) plus beta-lactams or aminoglycosides have been found effective in the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic (less than 500 pmn/microliters) children. Teicoplanin, 3-10 mg/kg i.v., has been administered as the sole antibiotic agent as a daily dose to more than 100 children and newborns with documented or suspected Gram-positive infections. Overall, teicoplanin was found to be a very effective and well tolerated treatment for Gram-positive infections in pediatric patients. Further trials are required to confirm these observations.

摘要

替考拉宁主要在成人中进行了研究,在儿童中的研究较少。对2至12岁儿童的药理学研究表明,每日剂量3至6毫克/千克的替考拉宁不足以维持微生物学上有效的谷浓度,而10毫克/千克/天的给药方案足以获得有效的血清浓度。替考拉宁已单独或联合用于中性粒细胞减少或非中性粒细胞减少的儿科患者。已发现替考拉宁(10毫克/千克/天)加β-内酰胺类或氨基糖苷类联合用药对治疗中性粒细胞减少(低于500个中性粒细胞/微升)儿童的发热性疾病有效。静脉注射3至10毫克/千克的替考拉宁作为每日剂量已单独用于100多名有记录或疑似革兰氏阳性感染的儿童和新生儿。总体而言,替考拉宁被发现是治疗儿科患者革兰氏阳性感染的一种非常有效且耐受性良好的药物。需要进一步的试验来证实这些观察结果。

相似文献

1
Teicoplanin therapy in children: a review.儿童替考拉宁治疗:综述
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1990;72:35-7.
2
Teicoplanin for therapy of gram-positive infections in neutropenic patients.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1987;7(6):491-8.
3
[The use of teicoplanin in neutropenic patients: values and limits].[替考拉宁在中性粒细胞减少患者中的应用:价值与局限]
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1990 Jun;38(5 ( Pt 2)):552-6.
4
Teicoplanin in combination therapy for febrile episodes in neutropenic and non-neutropenic paediatric patients.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988 Jan;21 Suppl A:113-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/21.suppl_a.113.
5
[Teicoplanin and Gram-positive coccus infections. Results of a multicenter study on 66 cases].
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1987 May;35(5):511-5.
6
Therapy of serious gram-positive infections with teicoplanin.
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1989;15(1):29-31.
7
A prospective, controlled, randomized, non-blind, comparative study of the efficacy and safety of a once daily high dose of ceftriaxone plus ciprofloxacin versus thrice daily ceftazidime plus amikacin in empirical therapy for febrile neutropenic patients.一项前瞻性、对照、随机、非盲、比较性研究,旨在对比每日一次大剂量头孢曲松加环丙沙星与每日三次头孢他啶加阿米卡星在发热性中性粒细胞减少患者经验性治疗中的疗效和安全性。
Eur J Intern Med. 2008 Dec;19(8):619-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2007.08.011. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
8
The role of gram-positive therapy in the neutropenic patient.革兰氏阳性菌治疗在中性粒细胞减少患者中的作用。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Apr;27 Suppl B:51-60. doi: 10.1093/jac/27.suppl_b.51.
9
Prophylaxis, cost and effectiveness of therapy of infections caused by gram-positive organisms in neutropenic children.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Apr;27 Suppl B:61-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/27.suppl_b.61.
10
Randomized prospective study comparing cost-effectiveness of teicoplanin and vancomycin as second-line empiric therapy for infection in neutropenic patients.比较替考拉宁和万古霉素作为中性粒细胞减少患者感染二线经验性治疗的成本效益的随机前瞻性研究。
Haematologica. 1999 Mar;84(3):231-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Staphylococcal skin infections in children: rational drug therapy recommendations.儿童葡萄球菌皮肤感染:合理用药治疗建议
Paediatr Drugs. 2005;7(2):77-102. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200507020-00002.