Suppr超能文献

脊柱裂患者针对天然橡胶乳胶、香蕉和猕猴桃的特异性IgE的纵向研究。

Longitudinal study on specific IgE against natural rubber latex, banana and kiwi in patients with spina bifida.

作者信息

Cremer R, Mennicken O

机构信息

Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH, Kinderkrankenhaus, Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Köln, Germany.

出版信息

Klin Padiatr. 2011 Nov;223(6):352-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1273752. Epub 2011 Apr 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Up to 2 out of 3 spina bifida (sb) patients with natural rubber latex (NRL) antibodies (ab) have crossreacting IgE-ab against tropical fruit, due to structural homologies between several NRL antigens and allergenic fruit proteins. It is essential to investigate whether the patients were first sensitized against NRL or fruit, to give recommendations for an evidence-based prophylaxis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We investigated sera of 96 sb patients for specific IgE ab against NRL, banana and kiwi as examples for crossreacting fruit by FEIA (ImmunoCAP System, Phadia). These tests were repeated up to 3 times (mean after 2 years, maximum after 7 years).

RESULTS

In the first testing only 2 of 50 NRL-IgE negative patients (4%) had ab against banana or kiwi. 4 of the 46 NRL-IgE positive patients (8%) showed ab against banana (2) or kiwi (2), 3 (7%) against both fruit. Symptoms of fruit allergy were presented by 3 patients, all symptomatic patients had high levels of specific fruit-ab. In the follow-up study 2 patients with low sensitization against NRL lost their NRL ab and their fruit ab, another 2 only the fruit ab, whereas 4 NRL-sensitized patients newly developed ab against banana and 1 against kiwi. Only 2 patients developed ab against fruit without being sensitized against NRL. 7 out of 10 patients with banana and kiwi ab were atopics.

CONCLUSIONS

In most cases the sensitization against fruit follows the NRL sensitization. There is no need to recommend sb patients without NRL sensitization to primarily avoid tropical fruit.

摘要

目的

由于几种天然橡胶乳胶(NRL)抗原与致敏水果蛋白之间存在结构同源性,三分之二的脊柱裂(SB)患者体内的天然橡胶乳胶抗体(ab)会与热带水果发生交叉反应性IgE抗体反应。调查患者最初是对NRL还是水果致敏至关重要,以便为循证预防提供建议。

患者与方法

我们通过FEIA(免疫捕获系统,法玛新)检测了96例SB患者血清中针对NRL、香蕉和猕猴桃的特异性IgE抗体,香蕉和猕猴桃作为交叉反应水果的示例。这些检测最多重复3次(平均2年后,最长7年后)。

结果

首次检测时,50例NRL-IgE阴性患者中只有2例(4%)有针对香蕉或猕猴桃的抗体。46例NRL-IgE阳性患者中有4例(8%)显示有针对香蕉(2例)或猕猴桃(2例)的抗体,3例(7%)对两种水果都有抗体。3例患者出现水果过敏症状,所有有症状的患者特异性水果抗体水平都很高。在随访研究中,2例对NRL致敏程度低的患者失去了NRL抗体和水果抗体,另外2例仅失去了水果抗体,而4例对NRL致敏的患者新出现了针对香蕉的抗体,1例出现了针对猕猴桃的抗体。只有2例患者在未对NRL致敏的情况下出现了针对水果的抗体。10例有香蕉和猕猴桃抗体的患者中有7例是特应性体质。

结论

在大多数情况下,对水果的致敏继发于对NRL的致敏。对于没有NRL致敏的SB患者,无需建议其首先避免热带水果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验