• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性阻塞性肺疾病疾病管理计划的经济评价。

Economic evaluation of a disease management program for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

机构信息

Pulmonary Section, Department of Medicine, VA Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68105, USA.

出版信息

COPD. 2011 Jun;8(3):153-9. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2011.560129. Epub 2011 Apr 22.

DOI:10.3109/15412555.2011.560129
PMID:21513435
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The data on cost savings with disease management (DM) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is limited. A multicomponent DM program in COPD has recently shown in a large randomized controlled trial to reduce hospitalizations and emergency department visits compared to usual care (UC). The objectives of this study were to determine the cost of implementing the DM program and its impact on healthcare resource utilization costs compared to UC in high-risk COPD patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a post-hoc economic analysis of a multicenter randomized, adjudicator-blinded, controlled, 1-year trial comparing DM and UC at 5 Midwest region Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers. Health-care costs (hospitalizations, ED visits, respiratory medications, and the cost of the DM intervention) were compared in the COPD DM intervention and UC groups.

RESULTS

The composite outcome for all hospitalizations or ED visits were 27% lower in the DM group (123.8 mean events per 100 patient-years) compared to the UC group (170.5 mean events per 100 patient-years) (rate ratio 0.73; 0.56-0.90; p < 0.003). The cost of the DM intervention was $241,620 or $650 per patient. The total mean ± SD per patient cost that included the cost of DM in the DM group was 4491 ± 4678 compared to $5084 ± 5060 representing a $593 per patient cost savings for the DM program.

CONCLUSIONS

The DM intervention program in this study was unique for producing an average cost savings of $593 per patient after paying for the cost of DM intervention.

摘要

背景

关于疾病管理(DM)在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中节省成本的数据有限。最近一项多组分 COPD DM 计划的大型随机对照试验表明,与常规护理(UC)相比,该计划可降低住院率和急诊就诊率。本研究的目的是确定实施 DM 计划的成本,并与高危 COPD 患者的 UC 相比,评估其对医疗资源利用成本的影响。

材料和方法

这是一项多中心、随机、裁判盲法、对照、为期 1 年的试验的事后经济分析,该试验比较了 5 个中西部地区退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗中心的 DM 和 UC。在 COPD DM 干预组和 UC 组中比较了医疗保健成本(住院、急诊就诊、呼吸药物和 DM 干预成本)。

结果

DM 组的所有住院或急诊就诊的综合结果比 UC 组低 27%(100 名患者每年的平均事件数为 123.8 例)(发生率比为 0.73;0.56-0.90;p < 0.003)。DM 干预的成本为 241620 美元,即每位患者 650 美元。DM 组包括 DM 成本在内的每位患者的平均总成本为 4491 美元±4678 美元,而 UC 组为 5084 美元±5060 美元,DM 计划为每位患者节省 593 美元。

结论

本研究中的 DM 干预计划具有独特性,在支付 DM 干预成本后,每位患者的平均成本节省为 593 美元。

相似文献

1
Economic evaluation of a disease management program for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病疾病管理计划的经济评价。
COPD. 2011 Jun;8(3):153-9. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2011.560129. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
2
Burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Medicare beneficiaries residing in long-term care facilities.长期护理机构中医疗保险受益人的慢性阻塞性肺疾病负担
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2009 Oct;7(5):262-70. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2009.11.003.
3
Risk of hospitalizations/emergency department visits and treatment costs associated with initial maintenance therapy using fluticasone propionate 500 microg/salmeterol 50 microg compared with ipratropium for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in older adults.与异丙托溴铵相比,使用丙酸氟替卡松500微克/沙美特罗50微克进行初始维持治疗的老年人慢性阻塞性肺疾病住院/急诊就诊风险及治疗费用。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2008 Aug;6(3):138-46. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2008.08.005.
4
Can a disease self-management program reduce health care costs? The case of older women with heart disease.疾病自我管理项目能否降低医疗保健成本?以老年心脏病女性为例。
Med Care. 2003 Jun;41(6):706-15. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000065128.72148.D7.
5
Comparison of hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and costs in a historical cohort of Texas Medicaid patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, by initial medication regimen.根据初始药物治疗方案,对德克萨斯州医疗补助慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者历史队列中的住院情况、急诊科就诊情况及费用进行比较。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jun;29(6):1203-13. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.006.
6
Disease management program for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial.慢性阻塞性肺疾病疾病管理方案:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Oct 1;182(7):890-6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200910-1579OC. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
7
Cost and utilization analysis of a pediatric emergency department diversion project.儿科急诊科分流项目的成本与利用情况分析
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):1075-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2093.
8
Cost analysis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a tertiary care setting in Taiwan.台湾某三级医疗环境中慢性阻塞性肺疾病的成本分析。
Respirology. 2008 Sep;13(5):689-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2008.01308.x. Epub 2008 May 29.
9
Anticoagulation monitoring by an anticoagulation service is more cost-effective than routine physician care.抗凝监测服务比常规医生护理更具成本效益。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1404-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.021. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
10
Retrospective incremental cost analysis of a hospital-based COPD Disease Management Programme in Sweden.瑞典一项基于医院的慢性阻塞性肺疾病疾病管理项目的回顾性增量成本分析。
Health Policy. 2007 May;81(2-3):309-19. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.05.013. Epub 2006 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost savings associated with a web-based physical activity intervention for COPD.与 COPD 相关的基于网络的身体活动干预的成本节约。
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Sep;28(9):445-451. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.89220.
2
Self-management interventions for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的自我管理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 10;1(1):CD002990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002990.pub4.
3
Can self-management programmes change healthcare utilisation in COPD?: A systematic review and framework analysis.
自我管理计划能否改变 COPD 的医疗保健利用情况?:系统评价和框架分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jan;104(1):50-63. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
4
Models of care across the continuum of exacerbations for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者病情加重连续过程中的照护模式。
Chron Respir Dis. 2020 Jan-Dec;17:1479973119895457. doi: 10.1177/1479973119895457.
5
Exploring Care Attributes of Nephrologists Ranking Favorably on Measures of Value.探讨在价值衡量标准上表现出色的肾病学家的护理属性。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 Dec;30(12):2464-2472. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019030219. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
6
Impact of a Health Management Program on Healthcare Outcomes among Patients on Augmentation Therapy for Alpha 1-Antitrypsin Deficiency: An Insurance Claims Analysis.健康管理计划对接受α1-抗胰蛋白酶缺乏症增龄疗法患者的医疗保健结局的影响:一项保险理赔分析。
Adv Ther. 2018 Apr;35(4):467-481. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0690-4. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
7
Action plans with brief patient education for exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重的简短患者教育行动计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 19;12(12):CD005074. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005074.pub4.
8
Continuity in a VA patient-centered medical home reduces emergency department visits.退伍军人以患者为中心的医疗之家的连续性可减少急诊就诊次数。
PLoS One. 2014 May 27;9(5):e96356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096356. eCollection 2014.
9
Indirect costs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a review of the economic burden on employers and individuals in the United States.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的间接成本:对美国雇主和个人经济负担的综述。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014 Mar 19;9:289-300. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S57157. eCollection 2014.
10
The health economic impact of disease management programs for COPD: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.疾病管理计划对 COPD 的健康经济影响:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
BMC Pulm Med. 2013 Jul 3;13:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-13-40.