University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK.
Europace. 2011 May;13(5):723-46. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur126.
Despite the clear net clinical benefit of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at risk for stroke, major bleeding events (especially intra-cranial bleeds) may be devastating events when they do occur. The decision for OAC is often based on a careful assessment of both stroke risk and bleeding risk, but clinical scores for bleeding risk estimation are much less well validated than stroke risk scales. Also, the estimation of bleeding risk is rendered difficult since many of the known factors that increase bleeding risk overlap with stroke risk factors. As well as this, many factors that increase bleeding risk are transient, such as variable international normalized ratio values, operations, vascular procedures, or drug-drug and food-drug interactions. In this Position Document, we comprehensively review the published evidence and propose a consensus on bleeding risk assessments in AF patients, with a view to summarizing 'best practice' when approaching antithrombotic therapy in AF patients. We address the epidemiology and size of the problem of bleeding risk in AF and review established bleeding risk factors. We also summarize definitions of bleeding in the published literature. Patient values and preferences balancing the risk of bleeding against thrombo-embolism is reviewed, and the prognostic implications of bleeding are discussed. We also review bleeding risk stratification and currently published bleeding risk schema. A brief discussion of special situations [e.g. peri-ablation, peri-devices (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, pacemakers) and presentation with acute coronary syndromes and/or requiring percutaneous coronary interventions/stents and bridging therapy], as well as a discussion of prevention of bleeds and managing bleeding complications, is made. Finally, this document also puts forwards consensus statements that may help to define evidence gaps and assist in everyday clinical practice. Bleeding risk is almost inevitably lower than stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. Nonetheless, identification of patients at high risk of bleeding and delineation of conditions and situations associated with bleeding risk can help to refine antithrombotic therapy to minimize bleeding risk.
尽管在有卒中风险的心房颤动(房颤)患者中,口服抗凝剂(OAC)具有明确的净临床获益,但当大出血事件(尤其是颅内出血)发生时,可能会造成灾难性后果。OAC 的决策通常基于对卒中风险和出血风险的仔细评估,但出血风险评估的临床评分远不如卒中风险评分得到充分验证。此外,由于许多增加出血风险的因素与卒中风险因素重叠,出血风险的评估变得困难。不仅如此,许多增加出血风险的因素是短暂的,例如国际标准化比值(INR)值变化、手术、血管操作或药物-药物和食物-药物相互作用。在本立场文件中,我们全面审查了已发表的证据,并就房颤患者的出血风险评估提出了共识,以期在房颤患者抗血栓治疗方法中总结“最佳实践”。我们讨论了房颤患者出血风险的流行病学和规模,并回顾了已确立的出血风险因素。我们还总结了已发表文献中出血的定义。患者的价值观和偏好权衡出血风险与血栓栓塞风险,讨论了出血的预后意义。我们还审查了出血风险分层和目前发表的出血风险方案。简要讨论了特殊情况[例如消融前、设备(植入式心律转复除颤器、起搏器)前和急性冠状动脉综合征表现和/或需要经皮冠状动脉介入治疗/支架和桥接治疗],以及出血预防和出血并发症管理的讨论。最后,本文还提出了共识声明,这些声明可能有助于确定证据差距并协助日常临床实践。在房颤患者中,出血风险几乎肯定低于卒中风险。尽管如此,识别出血风险高的患者,并确定与出血风险相关的情况和情况,可以帮助优化抗血栓治疗,以最大程度降低出血风险。