• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当代颞骨骨折分类系统是否反映了同时存在的颅内和颈椎损伤?

Do contemporary temporal bone fracture classification systems reflect concurrent intracranial and cervical spine injuries?

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati/Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2011 May;121(5):929-32. doi: 10.1002/lary.21718.

DOI:10.1002/lary.21718
PMID:21520104
Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Temporal bone fractures (TBFs) are a frequent manifestation of head trauma. We investigated the prevalence of concurrent intracranial injuries (ICIs) and cervical spine injuries (CSIs) in a series of patients with TBFs and attempted to identify significant associations between current TBF classification systems and either ICI or CSI.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series with chart review.

METHODS

The records of all patients ≥18 years of age diagnosed with a basilar skull fracture, including TBF, at a level I trauma center from 2004 to 2009 were reviewed. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores were collected. Imaging studies were reviewed to classify TBF using the traditional longitudinal-transverse-mixed and otic capsule-sparing versus -involving systems and identify concurrent ICI and CSI.

RESULTS

Of 1,279 patients, 202 (15.8%) met inclusion criteria. There were 160 (79.2%) males. Sixteen (7.9%) patients had bilateral TBFs. Falls (n = 66, 32.7%) represented the most common mechanism for TBF. Longitudinal (n = 96, 44.0%) and otic capsule-sparing (n = 209, 95.9%) fractures were the most prevalent subtypes. There were 184 (91.1%) patients who sustained ICI and 18 (8.9%) who demonstrated CSI. Longitudinal, transverse, mixed, otic capsule-sparing, or otic capsule-involving TBF subtypes had no statistically significant associations with mechanism of injury, GCS score, or concomitant ICI or CSI.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 90% of patients sustaining TBF presented with concomitant ICI, and 9% sustained CSI. Current TBF classification systems do not correlate with these outcomes. A more sophisticated, multidisciplinary classification system encompassing radiographic and clinical findings may better predict neurologic, neuro-otologic, and skull base complications.

摘要

目的/假设:颞骨骨折(TBFs)是头部外伤的常见表现。我们研究了一系列 TBF 患者中并发颅内损伤(ICIs)和颈椎损伤(CSIs)的患病率,并试图确定当前 TBF 分类系统与 ICI 或 CSI 之间的显著关联。

研究设计

回顾性病例系列研究,病历回顾。

方法

回顾 2004 年至 2009 年在一级创伤中心诊断为颅底骨折(包括 TBF)的所有年龄≥18 岁患者的记录。收集患者的人口统计学资料、损伤机制和格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)。回顾影像学检查,使用传统的纵向-横向混合和耳囊保留与受累系统对 TBF 进行分类,并确定并发 ICI 和 CSI。

结果

在 1279 名患者中,有 202 名(15.8%)符合纳入标准。其中 160 名(79.2%)为男性。16 名(7.9%)患者双侧 TBF。跌倒(n=66,32.7%)是 TBF 最常见的机制。纵向(n=96,44.0%)和耳囊保留(n=209,95.9%)骨折是最常见的亚型。184 名(91.1%)患者发生 ICI,18 名(8.9%)患者发生 CSI。纵向、横向、混合、耳囊保留或耳囊受累 TBF 亚型与损伤机制、GCS 评分或并发 ICI 或 CSI 无统计学显著关联。

结论

超过 90%的 TBF 患者伴有并发 ICI,9%的患者伴有 CSI。当前的 TBF 分类系统与这些结果无关。一个更复杂的、多学科的分类系统,包括影像学和临床表现,可能更好地预测神经、神经耳科学和颅底并发症。

相似文献

1
Do contemporary temporal bone fracture classification systems reflect concurrent intracranial and cervical spine injuries?当代颞骨骨折分类系统是否反映了同时存在的颅内和颈椎损伤?
Laryngoscope. 2011 May;121(5):929-32. doi: 10.1002/lary.21718.
2
A nationwide review of the associations among cervical spine injuries, head injuries, and facial fractures.一项关于颈椎损伤、头部损伤和面部骨折之间关联的全国性综述。
J Trauma. 2010 Mar;68(3):587-92. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b16bc5.
3
[Unstable spinal injuries in craniocerebral trauma].[颅脑创伤中的不稳定脊柱损伤]
Helv Chir Acta. 1993 Mar;59(4):655-64.
4
Combined high cervical spine and brain stem injuries: a complex and devastating injury in children.
J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Oct;40(10):1637-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.05.049.
5
Emergency department testing of skull fracture patients: minimum standards and physician's performance.颅骨骨折患者的急诊科检查:最低标准与医生表现
Conn Med. 1975 May;39(5):290-3.
6
[Diagnosis of fractures of the occipital condyles].[枕髁骨折的诊断]
Aktuelle Radiol. 1995 Jan;5(1):41-6.
7
The prevalence of cervical spine injury, head injury, or both with isolated and multiple craniomaxillofacial fractures.颈椎损伤、头部损伤或两者同时合并多发颅颌面骨折的发生率。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov;126(5):1647-1651. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ef90e4.
8
Head injury and facial injury: is there an increased risk of cervical spine injury?头部损伤和面部损伤:颈椎损伤风险会增加吗?
J Trauma. 1993 Apr;34(4):549-53; discussion 553-4.
9
[Clinical diagnosis and treatment of multiple-level injuries of the cervical spine].[颈椎多节段损伤的临床诊断与治疗]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2004 Oct 7;42(19):1182-4.
10
Facial trauma and the risk of intracranial injury in motorcycle riders.摩托车骑手面部创伤与颅内损伤风险
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Jan;41(1):18-26. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Otopathologic Patterns of Cellular Degeneration in the Peripheral Vestibular Organ Secondary to Head Trauma.头部外伤继发外周前庭器官细胞变性的耳病理学模式
Laryngoscope. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1002/lary.32258.
2
Temporal Bone Fractures and Related Complications in Pediatric and Adult Cranio-Facial Trauma: A Comparison of MDCT Findings in the Acute Emergency Setting.儿童和成人头面部创伤中的颞骨骨折及相关并发症:急性急诊情况下 MDCT 的比较研究结果。
Tomography. 2024 May 10;10(5):727-737. doi: 10.3390/tomography10050056.
3
[Role of helical computed tomography in petrous bone trauma: about 12 cases at the University Hospital Ibn Rochd of Casablanca].
螺旋计算机断层扫描在岩骨创伤中的作用:关于卡萨布兰卡伊本·罗什德大学医院的12例病例
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Jan 25;41:72. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.41.72.29902. eCollection 2022.
4
Audiologic Patterns of Otic Capsule Preserving Temporal Bone Fracture: Effects of the Affected Subsites.保留听骨链的颞骨骨折的听力学模式:受累亚部位的影响
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Sep;9(3):206-11. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2015.01116. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
5
Post traumatic deafness: a pictorial review of CT and MRI findings.创伤后耳聋:CT与MRI表现的影像综述
Insights Imaging. 2016 Jun;7(3):341-50. doi: 10.1007/s13244-016-0490-9. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
6
Comparison of the clinical relevance of traditional and new classification systems of temporal bone fractures.比较传统和新型颞骨骨折分类系统的临床相关性。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Aug;269(8):1893-9. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1849-7. Epub 2011 Nov 26.