Suppr超能文献

网格启用措施:利用科学 2.0 来标准化措施并共享数据。

Grid-enabled measures: using Science 2.0 to standardize measures and share data.

机构信息

National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-7365, USA.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2011 May;40(5 Suppl 2):S134-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.01.004.

Abstract

Scientists are taking advantage of the Internet and collaborative web technology to accelerate discovery in a massively connected, participative environment--a phenomenon referred to by some as Science 2.0. As a new way of doing science, this phenomenon has the potential to push science forward in a more efficient manner than was previously possible. The Grid-Enabled Measures (GEM) database has been conceptualized as an instantiation of Science 2.0 principles by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) with two overarching goals: (1) promote the use of standardized measures, which are tied to theoretically based constructs; and (2) facilitate the ability to share harmonized data resulting from the use of standardized measures. The first is accomplished by creating an online venue where a virtual community of researchers can collaborate together and come to consensus on measures by rating, commenting on, and viewing meta-data about the measures and associated constructs. The second is accomplished by connecting the constructs and measures to an ontological framework with data standards and common data elements such as the NCI Enterprise Vocabulary System (EVS) and the cancer Data Standards Repository (caDSR). This paper will describe the web 2.0 principles on which the GEM database is based, describe its functionality, and discuss some of the important issues involved with creating the GEM database such as the role of mutually agreed-on ontologies (i.e., knowledge categories and the relationships among these categories--for data sharing).

摘要

科学家们正在利用互联网和协作网络技术,在一个大规模连接、参与式的环境中加速发现,这种现象被一些人称为科学 2.0。作为一种新的科学方法,这种现象有可能以比以前更有效的方式推动科学的发展。国家癌症研究所 (NCI) 将网格启用措施 (GEM) 数据库构想为科学 2.0 原则的实例,其目标有两个:(1) 促进使用与理论基础结构相关联的标准化措施;(2) 促进使用标准化措施所产生的协调数据的共享能力。第一个目标是通过创建一个在线场所来实现的,在这个场所中,一个虚拟的研究人员社区可以共同协作,并通过对措施进行评分、评论和查看措施和相关结构的元数据来对措施达成共识。第二个目标是通过将结构和措施连接到一个本体框架来实现的,该框架具有数据标准和常见的数据元素,如 NCI 企业词汇系统 (EVS) 和癌症数据标准存储库 (caDSR)。本文将描述 GEM 数据库所基于的网络 2.0 原则,描述其功能,并讨论创建 GEM 数据库所涉及的一些重要问题,例如相互同意的本体的作用 (即,知识类别及其之间的关系 - 用于数据共享)。

相似文献

1
Grid-enabled measures: using Science 2.0 to standardize measures and share data.
Am J Prev Med. 2011 May;40(5 Suppl 2):S134-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.01.004.
2
Sharing behavioral data through a grid infrastructure using data standards.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):642-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001763. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
3
caCORE: a common infrastructure for cancer informatics.
Bioinformatics. 2003 Dec 12;19(18):2404-12. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg335.
4
Using collaborative web technology to construct the health information national trends survey.
J Health Commun. 2012;17(8):990-1000. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.700999.
5
Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures.
Implement Sci. 2012 Dec 11;7:119. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-119.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
[caCORE: core architecture of bioinformation on cancer research in America].
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2006 Apr 18;38(2):218-21.
10
Gene Ontology: looking backwards and forwards.
Genome Biol. 2005;6(1):103. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-6-1-103. Epub 2004 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

3
Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review.
Implement Sci. 2023 Jul 25;18(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z.
5
Harmonizing Implementation and Outcome Data Across HIV Prevention and Care Studies in Resource-Constrained Settings.
Glob Implement Res Appl. 2022;2(2):166-177. doi: 10.1007/s43477-022-00042-7. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
7
Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Health Care Setting: A Concept Analysis.
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2019 Oct/Dec;42(4):307-324. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000263.
8
Psychometric Properties of Patient-Facing eHealth Evaluation Measures: Systematic Review and Analysis.
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 11;19(10):e346. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7638.
9
Social and environmental predictors of walking among older adults.
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Aug 23;16(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0327-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Nudging best practice: the HITECH act and behavioral medicine.
Transl Behav Med. 2011 Mar 1;1(1):175-181. doi: 10.1007/s13142-010-0001-3.
2
Social Participation in Health 2.0.
Computer (Long Beach Calif). 2010 Nov 11;43(11):45-52. doi: 10.1109/MC.2010.326.
3
Time to reboot: resetting health care to support tobacco dependency treatment services.
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Dec;39(6 Suppl 1):S85-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.08.017.
5
The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 5;363(6):501-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006114. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
7
Bioinformatics: Tools to accelerate population science and disease control research.
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Jun;38(6):646-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.03.002.
8
Online resources of cancer data: barriers, benefits and lessons.
Brief Bioinform. 2011 Jan;12(1):52-63. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbq010. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
9
Surveys of physicians and electronic health information.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):859-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0909595.
10
PhenX: a toolkit for interdisciplinary genetics research.
Curr Opin Lipidol. 2010 Apr;21(2):136-40. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3283377395.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验