• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你所在社区的人都是谁?公共性犯罪者登记册上个人的描述性分析。

Who are the people in your neighborhood? A descriptive analysis of individuals on public sex offender registries.

机构信息

Department of Social Work, University of Washington, Tacoma, Campus Box 358425, 1900 Commerce Street, Tacoma, WA 98402-3100, United States.

出版信息

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011 May-Jun;34(3):149-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 May 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.04.001
PMID:21529945
Abstract

Despite growing focus on registration and notification systems as central elements of national sex offender management practice, there has been remarkably little systematic analysis of the content of these registries and the diversity of individuals contained within them. Specifically, little research attention has been paid to examining the heterogeneity of the population of registered sex offenders - a circumstance that may obscure important distinctions within the population and, in turn, may undermine the ostensible purpose of SORN to prevent sexual victimization. Addressing this significant gap in our current knowledge, this article sets forth a national profile of the registered sex offender (RSO) population, drawn from an analysis of data on 445,127 RSOs obtained from the public registries of 49 states, Washington, DC, Puerto Rico and Guam. In contrast with the homogenized perception about registered sex offenders that permeates much public discourse, the analysis illuminates the wide diversity of registrants across a range of demographic, offense-related, registry status, and risk-oriented variables. Policy and practice implications concerning risk, prevention, and the public safety utility of sex offender registries are discussed.

摘要

尽管注册和通知系统作为国家性犯罪者管理实践的核心要素越来越受到关注,但对这些登记册的内容和其中包含的个人多样性进行系统分析的情况却少之又少。具体来说,很少有研究关注到对登记性犯罪者人群的异质性进行检查——这种情况可能掩盖了人群中的重要区别,进而可能破坏性犯罪者登记册(SORN)防止性侵害的表面目的。为了弥补我们当前知识中的这一重大空白,本文从对来自 49 个州、华盛顿特区、波多黎各和关岛的公共登记处的 445,127 名性犯罪者登记数据的分析中,提出了一个全国性的登记性犯罪者(RSO)人群概况。与在许多公共话语中普遍存在的对登记性犯罪者的同质化看法形成鲜明对比的是,分析揭示了在一系列人口统计学、犯罪相关、登记册状况和风险导向变量方面,登记人的广泛多样性。讨论了与风险、预防以及性犯罪者登记册对公共安全的实用性有关的政策和实践影响。

相似文献

1
Who are the people in your neighborhood? A descriptive analysis of individuals on public sex offender registries.你所在社区的人都是谁?公共性犯罪者登记册上个人的描述性分析。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011 May-Jun;34(3):149-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 May 6.
2
Preventing sexual violence: can examination of offense location inform sex crime policy?预防性暴力:犯罪地点检查能否为性犯罪政策提供信息?
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011 May-Jun;34(3):160-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 Apr 29.
3
Misperceptions of sex offender perpetration: considering the impact of sex offender registration.性犯罪者犯罪的误解:考虑性犯罪者登记的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2009 Dec;24(12):2057-72. doi: 10.1177/0886260508327706. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
4
Victims' Attitudes Toward Sex Offenders and Sex Offender Legislation.受害者对性犯罪者及性犯罪者相关法律的态度。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Aug;62(11):3385-3407. doi: 10.1177/0306624X17740537. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
5
Public perception of sex offender social policies and the impact on sex offenders.公众对性犯罪者社会政策的认知及其对性犯罪者的影响。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2009 Dec;53(6):679-95. doi: 10.1177/0306624X08323454. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
6
Characteristics of Older Adult First-Time Sex Offenders: Insights From the Missouri Registry.老年初犯性犯罪者的特征:来自密苏里登记处的见解。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Mar;29(3):230-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.06.020. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
7
Juvenile female and male sex offenders: a comparison of offender, victim, and judicial processing characteristics.青少年女性和男性性犯罪者:犯罪者、受害者及司法程序特征比较
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2006 Apr;50(2):148-65. doi: 10.1177/0306624X05277941.
8
Typology of female sex offenders: a test of Vandiver and Kercher.女性性犯罪者的类型学:对万迪弗和凯彻的一项检验。
Sex Abuse. 2007 Jun;19(2):73-89. doi: 10.1177/107906320701900201. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
9
Sex offender notification and protective behavior.
Violence Vict. 2004 Jun;19(3):289-302. doi: 10.1891/vivi.19.3.289.65762.
10
A longitudinal examination of sex offender recidivism prior to and following the implementation of SORN.性犯罪者登记制度实施前后的性犯罪再犯的纵向研究。
Behav Sci Law. 2012 May-Jun;30(3):308-28. doi: 10.1002/bsl.1009. Epub 2011 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
"Hurt People Hurt Other People": The Link Between Past Trauma and Sexual Offending.“受过伤的人会伤害他人”:过去的创伤与性犯罪之间的联系。
Sex Offending. 2022 Mar 31;17:e7361. doi: 10.5964/sotrap.7361. eCollection 2022.
2
In what kinds of communities do people on the sex offender registry live? An analysis of ten states.性犯罪者登记册上的人生活在哪些类型的社区?对十个州的分析。
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2021 Aug;127. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106061. Epub 2021 May 12.
3
Older Individuals Convicted of Sexual Offenses: A Literature Review.
老年人性犯罪:文献综述。
Sex Abuse. 2022 Apr;34(3):341-371. doi: 10.1177/10790632211024244. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
4
Sex offender registries: exploring the attitudes and knowledge of political decision-makers.性犯罪者登记制度:探究政治决策者的态度与认知
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 May 14;27(3):478-492. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1733698. eCollection 2020.
5
An Evaluation of the Impact of Australia's First Community Notification Scheme.对澳大利亚首个社区通报计划影响的评估。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2016 Dec 1;24(3):339-355. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2016.1247606. eCollection 2017.
6
Veterans in Prison for Sexual Offenses: Characteristics and Reentry Service Needs.监狱中的性犯罪退役军人:特征和重返社会服务需求。
Sex Abuse. 2019 Aug;31(5):560-579. doi: 10.1177/1079063218793633. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
7
Narrative Roles Among Contact Versus Noncontact Sexual Offenders.接触性与非接触性性犯罪者的叙述角色。
Sex Abuse. 2019 Oct;31(7):765-788. doi: 10.1177/1079063218769651. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
8
Sex Offender Management Policies and Evidence-Based Recommendations for Registry Reform.性犯罪者管理政策和登记改革的循证建议。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 Mar 21;20(3):21. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0884-0.