Morell L, Carrascosa J M, Ferrándiz C, García-Bustinduy M, Fonseca E, Carretero G, Daudén E, Marrón S E, López-Estebaranz J L, Ferrán M, Sánchez-Regaña M, Muñoz-Santos C, Belinchón I, Puig Luis
Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, España.
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2011 Jun;102(5):354-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2010.12.013. Epub 2011 Apr 29.
The withdrawal of marketing authorization for efalizumab by the European Medicines Agency in February, 2009 provided a unique opportunity to assess the course of disease in patients who were not subject to the selection criteria and biases that were common in the pivotal trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the course of psoriasis following forced suspension of efalizumab in a group of patients treated in normal clinical practice. As secondary objectives, we sought to assess the relationships between clinical characteristics, treatment response, and disease course during efalizumab treatment and 12 and 24 weeks after suspension.
Information on the epidemiological profile and disease course during treatment and following suspension of the drug was collected from a group of patients treated with efalizumab. Statistical analyses were performed to identify predictive factors.
One hundred forty-seven patients from 12 Spanish hospitals were included in the study. During treatment, 4% of patients were diagnosed with generalized inflammatory flares. Most patients could be classified as having a good (55%) or moderate (18%) response to treatment. Rebound following withdrawal of efalizumab was observed in 30% of patients. The likelihood of rebound was independent of clinical characteristics, treatment response, or therapeutic approach used by the dermatologist following suspension.
There was a high frequency of rebound following suspension of efalizumab, exceeding the rate reported in pivotal trials. This is particularly noteworthy given the large proportion of patients with a good response to treatment and therefore believed to have a better prognosis. Other significant findings were the higher frequency of positive treatment response than observed in previous studies (possibly influenced by the mean treatment duration) and the high frequency of generalized inflammatory flares.
2009年2月欧洲药品管理局撤销依法利珠单抗的上市许可,这提供了一个独特的机会,可用于评估未受关键试验中常见选择标准和偏倚影响的患者的疾病进程。本研究的目的是评估在正常临床实践中接受治疗的一组患者被迫停用依法利珠单抗后银屑病的病程。作为次要目标,我们试图评估依法利珠单抗治疗期间以及停药后12周和24周时临床特征、治疗反应与疾病进程之间的关系。
从一组接受依法利珠单抗治疗的患者中收集有关流行病学特征以及治疗期间和停药后疾病进程的信息。进行统计分析以确定预测因素。
来自12家西班牙医院的147例患者纳入本研究。治疗期间,4%的患者被诊断为全身性炎症发作。大多数患者可分类为对治疗反应良好(55%)或中度(18%)。30%的患者在停用依法利珠单抗后出现病情反弹。反弹的可能性与临床特征、治疗反应或皮肤科医生在停药后采用的治疗方法无关。
停用依法利珠单抗后病情反弹的频率较高,超过了关键试验中报告的发生率。鉴于对治疗反应良好的患者比例较大,因此认为预后较好,这一点尤其值得注意。其他重要发现是治疗反应阳性的频率高于先前研究(可能受平均治疗持续时间影响)以及全身性炎症发作的频率较高。