Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Nov-Dec;18(6):853-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000072. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
The electronic exchange of health information among healthcare providers has the potential to produce enormous clinical benefits and financial savings, although realizing that potential will be challenging. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 will reward providers for 'meaningful use' of electronic health records, including participation in clinical data exchange, but the best ways to do so remain uncertain.
We analyzed patient visits in one community in which a high proportion of providers were using an electronic health record and participating in data exchange. Using claims data from one large private payer for individuals under age 65 years, we computed the number of visits to a provider which involved transitions in care from other providers as a percentage of total visits. We calculated this 'transition percentage' for individual providers and medical groups.
On average, excluding radiology and pathology, approximately 51% of visits involved care transitions between individual providers in the community and 36%-41% involved transitions between medical groups. There was substantial variation in transition percentage across medical specialties, within specialties and across medical groups. Specialists tended to have higher transition percentages and smaller ranges within specialty than primary care physicians, who ranged from 32% to 95% (including transitions involving radiology and pathology). The transition percentages of pediatric practices were similar to those of adult primary care, except that many transitions occurred among pediatric physicians within a single medical group.
Care transition patterns differed substantially by type of practice and should be considered in designing incentives to foster providers' meaningful use of health data exchange services.
医疗服务提供者之间电子健康信息的交换有可能产生巨大的临床效益和财务节省,尽管实现这一潜力将具有挑战性。2009 年美国复苏与再投资法案将奖励提供者对电子健康记录的“有意义的使用”,包括参与临床数据交换,但实现这一目标的最佳方式仍不确定。
我们分析了一个社区中患者就诊的情况,该社区中有很大比例的提供者正在使用电子健康记录并参与数据交换。我们使用一个大型私人支付者的索赔数据,计算了涉及从其他提供者转至本社区提供者的就诊次数占总就诊次数的百分比。我们为单个提供者和医疗集团计算了这个“转介百分比”。
平均而言,不包括放射科和病理科,大约 51%的就诊涉及社区内个体提供者之间的护理转介,36%-41%涉及医疗集团之间的转介。在医疗专业、专业内和医疗集团之间,转介百分比存在很大差异。与初级保健医生相比,专家的转介百分比较高,专业内差异较小,后者的转介百分比从 32%到 95%(包括涉及放射科和病理科的转介)。儿科实践的转介百分比与成人初级保健相似,只是许多转介发生在单个医疗集团内的儿科医生之间。
护理转介模式因实践类型而异,在设计激励措施以促进提供者对健康数据交换服务的有意义使用时应考虑这些模式。