• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
What Affects Clinicians' Usage of Health Information Exchange?什么因素影响临床医生对健康信息交换的使用?
Appl Clin Inform. 2011 Jan 1;2(3):250-262. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2011-03-RA-0021.
2
Clinicians' use of Health Information Exchange technologies for medication reconciliation in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs: a qualitative analysis.美国退伍军人事务部临床医生使用健康信息交换技术进行药物重整的情况:定性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):1194. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11690-w.
3
Key Factors Affecting Ambulatory Care Providers' Electronic Exchange of Health Information With Affiliated and Unaffiliated Partners: Web-Based Survey Study.影响门诊医疗服务提供者与附属及非附属合作伙伴进行健康信息电子交换的关键因素:基于网络的调查研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Nov 7;7(4):e12000. doi: 10.2196/12000.
4
Health Information Exchange.健康信息交换。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2015 Dec(220):1-465. doi: 10.23970/AHRQEPCERTA220.
5
How Do Dental Clinicians Obtain Up-To-Date Patient Medical Histories? Modeling Strengths, Drawbacks, and Proposals for Improvements.牙科临床医生如何获取最新的患者病史?对其优势、劣势及改进建议进行建模分析
Front Digit Health. 2022 Mar 28;4:847080. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.847080. eCollection 2022.
6
How could health information exchange better meet the needs of care practitioners?健康信息交换如何能更好地满足护理从业者的需求?
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Oct 15;5(4):861-77. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-06-RA-0055. eCollection 2014.
7
Health information exchange system usage patterns in three communities: practice sites, users, patients, and data.三个社区的健康信息交换系统使用模式:实践场所、用户、患者和数据。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Sep;82(9):810-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
8
Usage and effect of health information exchange: a systematic review.健康信息交换的使用和效果:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Dec 2;161(11):803-11. doi: 10.7326/M14-0877.
9
Health information exchange in Finland: Usage of different access types and predictors of paper use.芬兰的健康信息交换:不同访问类型的使用情况和纸张使用的预测因素。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Feb;122:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
10
Health information exchange technology on the front lines of healthcare: workflow factors and patterns of use.医疗保健第一线的健康信息交换技术:工作流程因素和使用模式。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):392-400. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000432. Epub 2011 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of eHealth use on general practice workload in the pre-COVID-19 era: a systematic review.电子健康使用对大流行前普通实践工作量的影响:系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11524-9.
2
Scratch Where It Itches: Electronic Sharing of Health Information and Costs.对症下“药”:健康信息与成本的电子共享
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 14;11(14):2023. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142023.
3
Transforming Health Data to Actionable Information: Recent Progress and Future Opportunities in Health Information Exchange.将健康数据转化为可操作的信息:健康信息交换的最新进展和未来机遇。
Yearb Med Inform. 2022 Aug;31(1):203-214. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742519. Epub 2022 Dec 4.
4
Searching the PDF Haystack: Automated Knowledge Discovery in Scanned EHR Documents.搜索 PDF 大山:扫描的电子健康记录文档中的自动化知识发现。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Mar;12(2):245-250. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726103. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
5
Practice and market factors associated with provider volume of health information exchange.与健康信息交换提供者数量相关的实践和市场因素。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jul 14;28(7):1451-1460. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab024.
6
Impact of Provider Prior Use of HIE on System Complexity, Performance, Patient Care, Quality and System Concerns.医疗服务提供者先前对健康信息交换(HIE)的使用对系统复杂性、性能、患者护理、质量及系统问题的影响。
Inf Syst Front. 2022;24(1):121-131. doi: 10.1007/s10796-020-10064-x. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
7
Hospital adoption of multiple health information exchange approaches and information accessibility.医院采用多种健康信息交换方法和信息可及性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Apr 1;27(4):577-583. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa003.
8
Mental health professional perspectives on health data sharing: Mixed methods study.心理健康专业人士对健康数据共享的看法:混合方法研究。
Health Informatics J. 2020 Sep;26(3):2067-2082. doi: 10.1177/1460458219893848. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
9
Key Factors Affecting Ambulatory Care Providers' Electronic Exchange of Health Information With Affiliated and Unaffiliated Partners: Web-Based Survey Study.影响门诊医疗服务提供者与附属及非附属合作伙伴进行健康信息电子交换的关键因素:基于网络的调查研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Nov 7;7(4):e12000. doi: 10.2196/12000.
10
The complementary nature of query-based and directed health information exchange in primary care practice.基于查询的和定向的健康信息交换在初级保健实践中的互补性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jan 1;27(1):73-80. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz134.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors motivating and affecting health information exchange usage.促进和影响健康信息交换使用的因素。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):143-9. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004812. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
2
Physicians' potential use and preferences related to health information exchange.医生在健康信息交换方面的潜在使用和偏好。
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Mar;80(3):171-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.11.008. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
3
Patients treated at multiple acute health care facilities: quantifying information fragmentation.在多个急性医疗保健机构接受治疗的患者:量化信息碎片化情况。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Dec 13;170(22):1989-95. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.439.
4
Physicians' opinions of a health information exchange.医生对健康信息交换的看法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jan-Feb;18(1):60-5. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.006502. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
5
What should we measure? Conceptualizing usage in health information exchange.我们应该测量什么?健康信息交换中的使用概念化。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):302-7. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000471.
6
A national strategy to put accountable care into practice.实施问责制医疗的国家战略。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 May;29(5):982-90. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0194.
7
Health information exchange: participation by Minnesota primary care practices.健康信息交换:明尼苏达州初级保健机构的参与情况。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 12;170(7):622-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.54.
8
The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home.以患者为中心的医疗之家的未来的健康信息技术。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr;29(4):614-21. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0007.
9
Making the most of federal health information technology regulations.充分利用联邦健康信息技术法规。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr;29(4):596-600. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0232.
10
Physician attitudes toward health information exchange: results of a statewide survey.医生对健康信息交换的态度:全州范围调查的结果。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):66-70. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3241.

什么因素影响临床医生对健康信息交换的使用?

What Affects Clinicians' Usage of Health Information Exchange?

作者信息

Rudin R, Volk L, Simon S, Bates D

机构信息

MIT CSAIL, Cambridge, USA.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2011 Jan 1;2(3):250-262. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2011-03-RA-0021.

DOI:10.4338/ACI-2011-03-RA-0021
PMID:22180762
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3237190/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ability to electronically exchange health information among healthcare providers holds enormous promise to improve care coordination and reduce costs. Provider-to-provider data exchange is an explicit goal of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and may be essential for the long-term success of the Affordable Care Act of 2010. However, little is known about what factors affect clinicians' usage of health information exchange (HIE) functionality. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that affect clinicians' HIE usage - in terms of frequency of contributing data to and accessing data from aggregate patient records - and suggest policies for fostering its usage. METHODS: We performed a qualitative study using grounded theory by interviewing clinician-users and HIE staff of one operational HIE which supported aggregate patient record functionality. Fifteen clinicians were interviewed for one hour each about what factors affect their HIE usage. Five HIE staff were asked about technology and training issues to provide context. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed. Recruitment excluded clinicians with little or no familiarity with the HIE and was restricted to one community and a small number of specialties. RESULTS: Clinicians were motivated to access the HIE by perceived improvements in care quality and time savings, but their motivation was moderated by an extensive list of factors including gaps in data, workflow issues and usability issues. HIE access intensities varied widely by clinician. Data contribution intensities to the HIE also varied widely and were affected by billing concerns and time constraints. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians, EHR and HIE product vendors and trainers should work toward integrating HIE into clinical workflows. Policies should create incentives for HIE organizations to assist clinicians in using HIE, develop measures of HIE contributions and accesses, and create incentives for clinicians to contribute data to HIEs.

摘要

背景

医疗服务提供者之间通过电子方式交换健康信息,有望极大地改善医疗协调并降低成本。提供者之间的数据交换是2009年《美国复苏与再投资法案》的明确目标,对于2010年《平价医疗法案》的长期成功可能至关重要。然而,对于影响临床医生使用健康信息交换(HIE)功能的因素却知之甚少。

目的

确定影响临床医生使用HIE的因素——从向汇总患者记录贡献数据和从汇总患者记录访问数据的频率方面——并提出促进其使用的政策建议。

方法

我们采用扎根理论进行了一项定性研究,通过采访一家支持汇总患者记录功能的运营中的HIE的临床医生用户和HIE工作人员。对15名临床医生每人进行了1小时的访谈,询问影响他们使用HIE的因素。向5名HIE工作人员询问了技术和培训问题以提供背景信息。访谈进行了录音、转录和分析。招募工作排除了对HIE几乎不熟悉或完全不熟悉的临床医生,并且仅限于一个社区和少数几个专业领域。

结果

临床医生因认为护理质量有所提高和节省时间而有动力访问HIE,但他们的动力受到一系列因素的制约,包括数据缺口、工作流程问题和可用性问题。临床医生的HIE访问强度差异很大。向HIE的数据贡献强度也差异很大,并受到计费问题和时间限制的影响。

结论

临床医生、电子健康记录(EHR)和HIE产品供应商及培训人员应努力将HIE集成到临床工作流程中。政策应激励HIE组织协助临床医生使用HIE,制定HIE贡献和访问的衡量标准,并激励临床医生向HIE贡献数据。