Suppr超能文献

聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a、干扰素 alfa 和拉米夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎的成本效果和成本效用分析在立陶宛。

Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the treatment of chronic hepatitis B with peginterferon alfa-2a, interferon alfa, and lamivudine in Lithuania.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eivenių 4, 50161 Kaunas, Lithuania.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2010;46(12):835-42.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B infection is an important health care problem worldwide. According to the World Health Organization, 10% to 15% of population is infected with hepatitis B virus. Nearly 100 new cases of acute hepatitis B are annually registered in Lithuania, but official statistics covers only 8-25% of all disease incidence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the treatment of chronic hepatitis B with peginterferon alfa-2a and compare it to treatment with interferon alfa and lamivudine in Lithuania.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A Markov model was used to evaluate long-term cost-effectiveness of the treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a and to compare it with treatment with interferon alfa and lamivudine. Peginterferon alfa-2a was administered by subcutaneous injections at a dosage of 180 μg every week for 48 weeks; interferon alfa, 6 million IU three times a week for 24 weeks; and lamivudine, 100 mg per day from 48 weeks to 5 years for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B and 100 mg per day up to 5 years in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.

RESULTS

Treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a gained 1.179 life years as compared to 0.658 life years gained with treatment with interferon alfa; incremental costs per incremental life-year gained (LYG) were 51,256.92 Lt (14,845.03 €). Treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a gained 0.545 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) with incremental costs per incremental QALY of 48,980.08 Lt (14,185.61 €). Treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a had twice higher cost-effectiveness than treatment with interferon alfa: 50,4167.00 Lt (146,016.85 €) vs. 954,020.08 Lt (276,303.31 €), respectively. Costs for a complete response were also twice lower. Treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a gained 0.757 incremental LYG more compared to lamivudine (48-week course). Comparing incremental cost-effectiveness using peginterferon alfa-2a for treatment, incremental costs per incremental LYG were 41,993.67 Lt (12,162.21 €); additionally there was a gain of 0.792 incremental QALYs, while incremental costs for incremental QALY were 40,096.19 Lt (11,612.66 €). Complete response costs were 83,515.98 Lt (24,187.89 €) less compared to lamivudine (48-week course).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B prolongs patients' overall survival and quality-adjusted life. Peginterferon alfa-2a was the most effective drug registered in Lithuania for CHB treatment.

摘要

背景

慢性乙型肝炎感染是全球范围内一个重要的医疗保健问题。根据世界卫生组织的数据,全球 10%至 15%的人口感染乙型肝炎病毒。立陶宛每年约有 100 例急性乙型肝炎新病例登记,但官方统计仅涵盖了所有发病的 8-25%。本研究旨在评估聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 治疗慢性乙型肝炎的成本效益,并将其与立陶宛干扰素 alfa 和拉米夫定的治疗进行比较。

材料和方法

使用 Markov 模型评估聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 的长期成本效益,并将其与干扰素 alfa 和拉米夫定的治疗进行比较。聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 以 180 μg 的剂量皮下注射,每周一次,共 48 周;干扰素 alfa 每周三次,每次 600 万 IU,共 24 周;拉米夫定,HBeAg 阳性慢性乙型肝炎治疗 48 周至 5 年,每天 100mg,HBeAg 阴性慢性乙型肝炎每天 100mg,持续 5 年。

结果

与干扰素 alfa 治疗相比,聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 治疗可获得 1.179 个生命年,增量生命年(LYG)的增量成本为 51,256.92 立特(14,845.03 欧元)。聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 治疗可获得 0.545 个质量调整生命年(QALY),增量 QALY 的增量成本为 48,980.08 立特(14,185.61 欧元)。与干扰素 alfa 治疗相比,聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 治疗具有更高的成本效益:50,4167.00 立特(146,016.85 欧元)与 954,020.08 立特(276,303.31 欧元),分别。完全应答的成本也降低了两倍。与拉米夫定(48 周疗程)相比,聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 治疗可获得 0.757 个额外的 LYG。使用聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 进行治疗的增量成本效益比较,增量 LYG 的增量成本为 41,993.67 立特(12,162.21 欧元);另外还有 0.792 个增量 QALY 的获益,而增量 QALY 的增量成本为 40,096.19 立特(11,612.66 欧元)。与拉米夫定(48 周疗程)相比,完全应答的成本降低了 83,515.98 立特(24,187.89 欧元)。

结论

慢性乙型肝炎的治疗可延长患者的总生存期和质量调整生命。聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 是立陶宛注册的治疗 CHB 的最有效药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验