• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童视力测试中的拥挤现象——测试设计和年龄的影响

Crowding in children's visual acuity tests--effect of test design and age.

作者信息

Norgett Yvonne, Siderov John

机构信息

Department of Vision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, East Road, Cambridge CB11PT, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Aug;88(8):920-7. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31821bd2d3.

DOI:10.1097/OPX.0b013e31821bd2d3
PMID:21532515
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of test design (crowding) and age on visual acuity in a sample of young children.

METHODS

Vision was measured in 103 children aged between 4 and 9 years using five different visual acuity tests. The tests included three crowded tests: logMAR Crowded test, the Sonksen logMAR test, and the Crowded Kay Picture test, and two single optotype tests: the Single Kay Picture and Sheridan Gardiner tests. Tests were presented in a random order using standardized instructions and a defined end-point. Results were analyzed in two age groups, younger (4 to 6 years) and older (7 to 9 years).

RESULTS

In both groups, there was a significant main effect of test on acuity (younger: F = 63.92, dF = 4, p < 0.001; older: F = 63.59, dF = 4, p < 0.001). In the younger group, an effect of crowding was seen in all three crowded tests, but in the older group, an effect of crowding was seen only in the crowded letter tests. In both groups, mean acuity was lowest with the logMAR Crowded test, which has the closest interoptotype spacing (0.5), slightly higher with the Sonksen test (with interoptotype spacing of 1.0) and highest with the single optotype tests (no crowding). More crowding was seen in the younger children.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that maturation of line acuity is still taking place between the ages of 4 and 9 years. Measured acuity is affected by the amount of contour interaction induced by the type of optotype (letter or picture) and by the interoptotype separation. Another factor, probably a maturation of gaze control or selective attention is responsible for the reduction in crowding with age.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查测试设计(拥挤程度)和年龄对幼儿样本视力的影响。

方法

使用五种不同的视力测试方法对103名年龄在4至9岁之间的儿童进行视力测量。测试包括三种拥挤测试:对数最小分辨角(logMAR)拥挤测试、桑克森对数最小分辨角测试和拥挤凯氏图片测试,以及两种单视标测试:单凯氏图片测试和谢里丹·加德纳测试。测试按照随机顺序进行,使用标准化的指导语和明确的终点。结果在两个年龄组中进行分析,较年轻组(4至6岁)和较年长组(7至9岁)。

结果

在两个组中,测试对视力均有显著的主效应(较年轻组:F = 63.92,自由度 = 4,p < 0.001;较年长组:F = 63.59,自由度 = 4,p < 0.001)。在较年轻组中,在所有三种拥挤测试中都观察到了拥挤效应,但在较年长组中,仅在拥挤字母测试中观察到了拥挤效应。在两个组中,对数最小分辨角拥挤测试的平均视力最低,该测试的视标间距最接近(0.5),桑克森测试(视标间距为1.0)的平均视力略高,单视标测试(无拥挤)的平均视力最高。较年幼的儿童中观察到更多的拥挤现象。

结论

我们的结果表明,在4至9岁之间,视力敏锐度仍在发育。测量的视力受到视标类型(字母或图片)引起的轮廓相互作用量以及视标间距的影响。另一个因素,可能是注视控制或选择性注意力的成熟,导致了随着年龄增长拥挤效应的降低。

相似文献

1
Crowding in children's visual acuity tests--effect of test design and age.儿童视力测试中的拥挤现象——测试设计和年龄的影响
Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Aug;88(8):920-7. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31821bd2d3.
2
The logMAR Kay picture test and the logMAR acuity test: a comparative study.对数最小分辨角(logMAR)凯氏图片测试与对数最小分辨角视力测试:一项对比研究。
Eye (Lond). 2009 Jan;23(1):85-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702990. Epub 2007 Sep 28.
3
Crowded letter and crowded picture logMAR acuity in children with amblyopia: a quantitative comparison.弱视儿童拥挤字母和拥挤图片的对数最小分辨角视力:定量比较
Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;101(4):457-461. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307677. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
4
The effects of blur and eccentric viewing on adult acuity for pediatric tests: implications for amblyopia detection.模糊和偏心注视对儿童视力检查成人视力的影响:对弱视检测的影响。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 23;54(10):6934-43. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12543.
5
Visual acuity assessment: a comparison of two tests for measuring children's vision.视力评估:两种测量儿童视力测试的比较
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2003 Nov;23(6):541-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00150.x.
6
The effect of colored crowding bars on the HOTV visual acuity test in amblyopic patients.彩色拥挤条对弱视患者HOTV视力测试的影响。
J AAPOS. 2008 Aug;12(4):361-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.12.009.
7
Landolt C-Tests With "Fixed" Arcmin Separations Detect Amblyopia But Underestimate Crowding in Moderate-to-Severe Amblyopic Children and Adults.Landolt C 测验采用“固定”弧分分离度检测弱视,但低估了中重度弱视儿童和成人的拥挤度。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024 Aug 1;65(10):33. doi: 10.1167/iovs.65.10.33.
8
Mesopic visual acuity is less crowded.中间视觉敏锐度受干扰较少。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep;256(9):1739-1746. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4017-6. Epub 2018 May 28.
9
Modified Allen pictures to assess amblyopia in young children.
Ophthalmology. 1990 Jun;97(6):827-32. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(90)32504-6.
10
The differing impact of induced astigmatic blur on crowded and uncrowded paediatric visual acuity chart results.诱导性散光模糊对拥挤和不拥挤的小儿视力表结果的不同影响。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012 Nov;32(6):492-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00939.x. Epub 2012 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Percentile Distribution of Habitual-Correction Visual Acuity in a Sample of 1500 Children Aged 5 to 15 Years in Italy.意大利1500名5至15岁儿童样本中习惯性矫正视力的百分位数分布
Pediatr Rep. 2025 Aug 11;17(4):85. doi: 10.3390/pediatric17040085.
2
Landolt C-Tests With "Fixed" Arcmin Separations Detect Amblyopia But Underestimate Crowding in Moderate-to-Severe Amblyopic Children and Adults.Landolt C 测验采用“固定”弧分分离度检测弱视,但低估了中重度弱视儿童和成人的拥挤度。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024 Aug 1;65(10):33. doi: 10.1167/iovs.65.10.33.
3
Validation of the Waterloo Differential Visual Acuity Test (WatDAT) and Comparison With Existing Pediatric Tests of Visual Acuity.
滑铁卢小儿远视力测试(WatDAT)的验证及其与现有儿童视力测试的比较。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Sep 1;12(9):13. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.9.13.
4
Retrobulbar Blood Flow Parameters in Patients With Anisometropic Amblyopia.屈光参差性弱视患者的球后血流参数
Cureus. 2023 Feb 15;15(2):e35025. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35025. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Crowding can impact both low and high contrast visual acuity measurements.拥挤会影响低对比度和高对比度视力测量。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 29;12(1):16338. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20479-y.
6
The Effect of Test Method on Visual Acuity in School Children Aged 4-5.测试方法对4至5岁学童视力的影响
Br Ir Orthopt J. 2022 Apr 5;18(1):11-17. doi: 10.22599/bioj.262. eCollection 2022.
7
Analysis of the Reliability and Repeatability of Distance Visual Acuity Measurement with EyeSpy 20/20.使用EyeSpy 20/20进行远距离视力测量的可靠性和可重复性分析。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 8;16:1099-1108. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S352164. eCollection 2022.
8
Visual acuity percentile curves in a Spanish paediatric population.西班牙儿科人群的视力百分位曲线。
J Optom. 2022 Jan-Mar;15(1):69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
9
Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.基于图片的视力表是否高估了视力?成人和儿童中凯氏图片、利氏符号、HOTV和基勒对数最小分辨角视力表与斯隆字母视力表的比较。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0170839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170839. eCollection 2017.
10
Childhood amblyopia: current management and new trends.儿童弱视:当前的治疗与新趋势
Br Med Bull. 2016 Sep;119(1):75-86. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldw030. Epub 2016 Aug 19.