Ruttum Mark S, Covert Douglas J
Departments of Ophthalmology, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
J AAPOS. 2008 Aug;12(4):361-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.12.009.
Colored versus black crowding bars surrounding a black optotype may induce a greater level of interest in visual acuity testing in young children. To evaluate the adequacy of colored bars for a satisfactory crowding effect in children with amblyopia, we compared visual acuity measurements using black versus red, green, or yellow bars.
To choose the best color to compare with black, 53 patients with amblyopia were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 crowding bar colors. Subjects had the visual acuity of each eye measured with black HOTV optotypes and bars and then with black optotypes and either red, green, or yellow bars. In a second phase of the study red crowding bars were compared with black in a group of 48 different patients with amblyopia.
The difference in logMAR visual acuity between amblyopic eyes tested with red versus black crowding bars was not statistically significant (mean visual acuities of -0.24 and -0.26, respectively; p = 0.315), but the difference was significant with either green (-0.30 and -0.34; p = 0.047) or yellow (-0.14 and -0.24; p = 0.0003). In the nonamblyopic eyes none of the colored crowding bars yielded significantly different visual acuity measurements compared with black. In the second phase of the study red crowding bars yielded an average of one letter worse visual acuity than black bars, but the difference was not statistically significant.
Red crowding bars surrounding black optotypes are an acceptable alternative to black crowding bars for the measurement of visual acuity in amblyopic eyes.
黑色视标周围的彩色与黑色拥挤条可能会引起幼儿对视敏度测试更高的兴趣水平。为了评估彩色条对弱视儿童产生满意拥挤效应的适宜性,我们比较了使用黑色条与红色、绿色或黄色条时的视敏度测量结果。
为了选择与黑色进行比较的最佳颜色,53例弱视患者被随机分配到3种拥挤条颜色中的一种。受试者每只眼睛先用黑色HOTV视标和条测量视敏度,然后用黑色视标和红色、绿色或黄色条测量视敏度。在研究的第二阶段,在一组48例不同的弱视患者中比较红色拥挤条与黑色拥挤条。
用红色与黑色拥挤条测试的弱视眼之间的logMAR视敏度差异无统计学意义(平均视敏度分别为-0.24和-0.26;p = 0.315),但与绿色(-0.30和-0.34;p = 0.047)或黄色(-0.14和-0.24;p = 0.0003)比较时差异有统计学意义。在非弱视眼中,与黑色相比,没有一种彩色拥挤条产生的视敏度测量结果有显著差异。在研究的第二阶段,红色拥挤条产生的视敏度平均比黑色条差一个字母,但差异无统计学意义。
黑色视标周围的红色拥挤条是测量弱视眼视敏度时黑色拥挤条的可接受替代物。