King Stephen D W
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Washington 98109, USA.
J Health Care Chaplain. 2011;17(1-2):38-45. doi: 10.1080/08854726.2011.559841.
This article is a response by a long-term oncology chaplain to a case by another oncology chaplain. The author notes interventions key to the relationship and outcomes, highlights differences in chaplaincy styles, and summarizes significant outcomes that are common in oncology chaplaincy. The purpose of the response is to further demonstrate how chaplains think about and engage patients/families in chaplaincy care as well as to stimulate the reflective process of the readers of the case study.
本文是一位长期从事肿瘤学的牧师对另一位肿瘤学牧师的案例的回应。作者指出了对关系和结果至关重要的干预措施，强调了牧师风格的差异，并总结了肿瘤学牧师工作中常见的重要成果。回应的目的是进一步展示牧师在牧师关怀中如何思考并与患者/家属互动，同时激发案例研究读者的反思过程。
