School of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Conserv Biol. 2011 Aug;25(4):827-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01686.x. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
The use of conservation easements as a conservation mechanism for private land has increased greatly in the past decade; conservation easements now protect over 15 million ha across the United States from residential and commercial development. We used a mailed survey and in-depth telephone interviews to determine factors that motivate private landowners in Iowa, Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin (U.S.A.) to place conservation easements on their properties. The mailed survey asked about characteristics of landowners, their properties, and their opinions on 9 factors related to the decision to place an easement. A follow-up telephone interview was completed with 19 mail-survey participants to gain an in-depth understanding of the action and to triangulate the results with the questionnaire. Place attachment, which is a measure of personal connection to a location or property, was the greatest motivation for implementation of an easement. Results of a principal components analysis suggested contributing to the public good underlaid several of the strong motivational factors for participation. Financial reasons were the lowest ranked motivational factor; however, financial concerns may facilitate placement of an easement that would otherwise not be realized. We believe that our results may be transferable to places where land protected by easements is not dominated by traditional farming (row crops, pastures, and hay), timber harvesting, or nonextractive uses (e.g., habitat for wild animals, recreation, and protection of ecosystem services).
在过去十年中,作为保护私人土地的一种保护机制,保护地役权的使用大大增加;保护地役权现在保护了美国超过 1500 万公顷的土地,使其免受住宅和商业开发的影响。我们使用邮寄调查和深入的电话访谈来确定促使爱荷华州、伊利诺伊州、密歇根州、俄亥俄州和威斯康星州(美国)的私人土地所有者将保护地役权置于其土地上的因素。邮寄调查询问了土地所有者、他们的财产以及他们对与决定放置地役权相关的 9 个因素的看法。对 19 名邮寄调查参与者进行了后续电话访谈,以深入了解该行动,并与调查问卷进行三角测量。对土地的依附感(即对一个地点或财产的个人联系的衡量)是实施地役权的最大动机。主成分分析的结果表明,为公共利益做出贡献是参与的几个强有力的动机因素之一。经济原因是排名最低的动机因素;然而,经济方面的考虑可能会促成原本不会实现的地役权的安置。我们相信,我们的研究结果可能适用于那些受地役权保护的土地不受传统农业(农作物、牧场和干草)、木材采伐或非开采用途(例如野生动物栖息地、娱乐和保护生态系统服务)主导的地方。