• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响采用保护地役权的动机。

Motivations influencing the adoption of conservation easements.

机构信息

School of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.

出版信息

Conserv Biol. 2011 Aug;25(4):827-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01686.x. Epub 2011 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01686.x
PMID:21535148
Abstract

The use of conservation easements as a conservation mechanism for private land has increased greatly in the past decade; conservation easements now protect over 15 million ha across the United States from residential and commercial development. We used a mailed survey and in-depth telephone interviews to determine factors that motivate private landowners in Iowa, Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin (U.S.A.) to place conservation easements on their properties. The mailed survey asked about characteristics of landowners, their properties, and their opinions on 9 factors related to the decision to place an easement. A follow-up telephone interview was completed with 19 mail-survey participants to gain an in-depth understanding of the action and to triangulate the results with the questionnaire. Place attachment, which is a measure of personal connection to a location or property, was the greatest motivation for implementation of an easement. Results of a principal components analysis suggested contributing to the public good underlaid several of the strong motivational factors for participation. Financial reasons were the lowest ranked motivational factor; however, financial concerns may facilitate placement of an easement that would otherwise not be realized. We believe that our results may be transferable to places where land protected by easements is not dominated by traditional farming (row crops, pastures, and hay), timber harvesting, or nonextractive uses (e.g., habitat for wild animals, recreation, and protection of ecosystem services).

摘要

在过去十年中,作为保护私人土地的一种保护机制,保护地役权的使用大大增加;保护地役权现在保护了美国超过 1500 万公顷的土地,使其免受住宅和商业开发的影响。我们使用邮寄调查和深入的电话访谈来确定促使爱荷华州、伊利诺伊州、密歇根州、俄亥俄州和威斯康星州(美国)的私人土地所有者将保护地役权置于其土地上的因素。邮寄调查询问了土地所有者、他们的财产以及他们对与决定放置地役权相关的 9 个因素的看法。对 19 名邮寄调查参与者进行了后续电话访谈,以深入了解该行动,并与调查问卷进行三角测量。对土地的依附感(即对一个地点或财产的个人联系的衡量)是实施地役权的最大动机。主成分分析的结果表明,为公共利益做出贡献是参与的几个强有力的动机因素之一。经济原因是排名最低的动机因素;然而,经济方面的考虑可能会促成原本不会实现的地役权的安置。我们相信,我们的研究结果可能适用于那些受地役权保护的土地不受传统农业(农作物、牧场和干草)、木材采伐或非开采用途(例如野生动物栖息地、娱乐和保护生态系统服务)主导的地方。

相似文献

1
Motivations influencing the adoption of conservation easements.影响采用保护地役权的动机。
Conserv Biol. 2011 Aug;25(4):827-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01686.x. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
2
Conservation easements: biodiversity protection and private use.保护地役权:生物多样性保护与私人利用。
Conserv Biol. 2007 Jun;21(3):709-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00660.x.
3
Perpetual conservation easements and landowners: evaluating easement knowledge, satisfaction and partner organization relationships.永久性保护地役权与土地所有者:评估地役权知识、满意度及合作组织关系。
J Environ Manage. 2014 Dec 15;146:284-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
4
Assessing the ecological and social benefits of private land conservation in Colorado.评估科罗拉多州私人土地保护的生态和社会效益。
Conserv Biol. 2008 Apr;22(2):284-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00895.x.
5
Spatial dependence and determinants of conservation easement adoptions in the United States.美国保护地役权采用的空间依赖性和决定因素。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Oct 15;296:113164. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113164. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
6
Land management restrictions and options for change in perpetual conservation easements.土地管理限制与永续保护地役权变更的选择。
Environ Manage. 2013 Jul;52(1):277-88. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0091-z. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
7
Interacting Social and Environmental Predictors for the Spatial Distribution of Conservation Lands.保护地空间分布的社会与环境交互预测因素
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 14;10(10):e0140540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140540. eCollection 2015.
8
Effects of disputes and easement violations on the cost-effectiveness of land conservation.纠纷和地役权侵犯对土地保护成本效益的影响。
PeerJ. 2015 Aug 13;3:e1185. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1185. eCollection 2015.
9
Incentive structure of and private landowner participation in an endangered species conservation program.激励机制与私有土地所有者参与濒危物种保护计划。
Conserv Biol. 2011 Jun;25(3):587-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01673.x. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
10
Devising appropriate policies and instruments in support of private conservation areas: lessons learned from the Klein Karoo, South Africa.制定支持私人保护区的适当政策和工具:来自南非卡鲁小卡鲁的经验教训。
Conserv Biol. 2010 Apr;24(2):470-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01344.x. Epub 2009 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond despair: Leveraging ecosystem restoration for psychosocial resilience.超越绝望:利用生态系统恢复增强心理社会适应力
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jan 14;122(2):e2307082121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2307082121. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
2
Partnering with cattle ranchers for forest landscape restoration.与肉牛养殖户合作开展森林景观恢复。
Ambio. 2020 Feb;49(2):593-604. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01224-8. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
3
Landowner Satisfaction with the Wetland Reserve Program in Texas: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.德克萨斯州土地所有者对湿地保护区计划的满意度:一项混合方法分析。
Environ Manage. 2016 Jan;57(1):97-108. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0596-8. Epub 2015 Aug 20.