SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture, 7465 Trondheim, Norway.
J Food Sci. 2011 Jan-Feb;76(1):S89-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01956.x. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
The main objectives of this study were to investigate (1) whether rested harvest of farmed cod was better maintained by chilling with slurry rather than by traditional ice storage, (2) whether chilling with slurry would be a feasible chilling method to assure low core temperatures (≤0 °C) at packing of gutted fish, and (3) the effects of superchilling compared with traditional ice on selected quality parameters of cod during storage. In the experiment, seawater slurry at -2.0 ± 0.3 °C was used. Anesthetized (AQUI-S™), percussion stunned, and stressed cod chilled in slurry were compared. Cod stored on ice were used as reference group. The fish were evaluated at the day of slaughter, and after 7 and 14 d of storage according to handling stress (initial muscle pH, muscle twitches, rigor mortis), core temperatures, quality index method, microbial counts, weight changes, salt and water content, water distribution, pH, adenosine triphosphate-degradation products, K-value, water-holding capacity, fillet color, and texture. Chilling cod in slurry was more rapid than chilling in ice. Prechilling (1 d) of cod in slurry before subsequent ice storage resulted in lower quality 7 d postmortem compared with both ice and continuous slurry storage. The potential advantages of superchilling became more prominent after 14 d with lower microbiological activity, better maintenance of freshness (lower total quality index scores and lower K-values) compared with fish stored on ice. A drawback with slurry-stored fish was that cloudy eyes developed earlier, in addition to weight gain and salt uptake compared to ice-stored fish. Practical Application: Chilling is an essential operation in any fish-processing plant. This manuscript addresses different applications of slurry ice in the processing and storage of Atlantic cod. Cod quality was assessed after 7 and 14 d of iced and superchilled storage.
(1)研究在捕捞后,使用冰浆冷却是否比传统的冰贮藏更有利于养殖鳕鱼的保存;(2)研究使用冰浆冷却是否是一种可行的冷却方法,以确保在去内脏鱼包装时核心温度(≤0°C)较低;(3)与传统冰相比,超冷对鳕鱼在储存过程中选择的质量参数的影响。在实验中,使用-2.0±0.3°C的海水浆。对麻醉(AQUI-S™)、冲击致晕和应激鳕鱼进行了冰浆冷却处理,并与冰贮藏的鳕鱼进行了比较。以冰贮藏的鳕鱼作为参考组。鱼在屠宰当天以及在 7 和 14 天的贮藏期后进行评估,评估的指标包括:处理应激(初始肌肉 pH 值、肌肉抽搐、僵直)、核心温度、质量指数法、微生物计数、重量变化、盐和水分含量、水分分布、pH 值、三磷酸腺苷降解产物、K 值、持水能力、鱼片颜色和质地。与在冰中冷却相比,鳕鱼在冰浆中冷却更为迅速。与冰和连续冰浆贮藏相比,在冰浆中预冷却(1 天)的鳕鱼随后在冰中贮藏,会导致死后 7 天的质量较低。与在冰中贮藏的鱼相比,超冷的潜在优势在 14 天后更为明显,其微生物活性较低,保鲜效果更好(总质量指数得分和 K 值较低)。与冰贮藏的鱼相比,使用冰浆贮藏的鱼存在一个缺点,即眼睛较早出现混浊,而且与冰贮藏的鱼相比,鱼体重量增加,盐分摄入增加。实际应用:冷却在任何鱼类加工厂都是一项基本操作。本文介绍了冰浆在大西洋鳕鱼加工和贮藏中的不同应用。在 14 天的冰藏和超冷贮藏后,对鳕鱼的质量进行了评估。