Department of Physical Therapy, New York University, 380 2nd Ave, 4th Floor, New York, NY, United States; Leon Root M.D. Motion Analysis Laboratory, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, United States.
Gait Posture. 2011 May;34(1):131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.02.028. Epub 2011 May 1.
The purpose of our study was to examine 1st metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint motion and flexibility and plantar loads in individuals with high, normal and low arch foot structures. Asymptomatic individuals (n=61), with high, normal and low arches participated in this study. Foot structure was quantified using malleolar valgus index (MVI) and arch height index (AHI). First MTP joint flexibility was measured using a specially constructed jig. Peak pressure under the hallux, 1st and 2nd metatarsals during walking was assessed using a pedobarograph. A one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc comparisons was used to assess between-group differences in MVI, AHI, early and late 1st MTP joint flexibility in sitting and standing, peak dorsiflexion (DF), and peak pressure under the hallux, 1st and 2nd metatarsals. Stepwise linear regression was used to identify predictors of hallucal loading. Significant between-group differences were found in MVI (F(2,56)=15.4, p<0.01), 1st MTP late flexibility in sitting (F(2,57)=3.7, p=0.03), and standing (F(2,57)=3.7, p=0.03). Post hoc comparisons demonstrated that 1st MTP late flexibility in sitting was significantly higher in individuals with low arch compared to high arch structure, and that 1st MTP late flexibility in standing was significantly higher in individuals with low arch compared to normal arch structure. Stepwise regression analysis indicated that MVI and 1st MTP joint early flexibility in sitting explain about 20% of the variance in hallucal peak pressure. Our results provide objective evidence indicating that individuals with low arches show increased 1st MTP joint late flexibility compared to individuals with normal arch structure, and that hindfoot alignment and 1st MTP joint flexibility affect hallucal loading.
本研究旨在探讨高、正常和低足弓结构个体的第一跖趾(MTP)关节运动和柔韧性以及足底负荷。无症状个体(n=61),包括高足弓、正常足弓和低足弓个体参与了本研究。使用外踝角(MVI)和足弓高度指数(AHI)定量足弓结构。使用特制夹具测量第一 MTP 关节柔韧性。使用足底压力计评估行走时大脚趾、第一和第二跖骨下的峰值压力。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)和 Bonferroni 校正的事后比较来评估组间 MVI、AHI、坐姿和站位时早期和晚期第一 MTP 关节柔韧性、最大背屈(DF)和大脚趾、第一和第二跖骨下的峰值压力的差异。逐步线性回归用于确定大脚趾负荷的预测因子。MVI(F(2,56)=15.4,p<0.01)、坐姿晚期第一 MTP 关节柔韧性(F(2,57)=3.7,p=0.03)和站位(F(2,57)=3.7,p=0.03)存在显著组间差异。事后比较表明,与高足弓结构相比,低足弓个体的坐姿晚期第一 MTP 关节柔韧性显著更高,与正常足弓结构相比,低足弓个体的站立位晚期第一 MTP 关节柔韧性显著更高。逐步回归分析表明,MVI 和坐姿早期第一 MTP 关节柔韧性解释了大脚趾峰值压力变异的约 20%。我们的结果提供了客观证据,表明与正常足弓结构个体相比,低足弓个体的第一 MTP 关节晚期柔韧性增加,并且后足对线和第一 MTP 关节柔韧性影响大脚趾的负荷。