• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[T1-2期结直肠癌淋巴结转移及预后相关危险因素分析]

[Analysis of risk factors associated with lymph node metastasis and prognosis of T1-2 colorectal cancer].

作者信息

Chai Rui, Fu Chuan-gang, Wang Hao, Liu Lian-jie

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Apr;14(4):245-8.

PMID:21538263
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate factors associated with lymph node metastasis and prognosis in patients with T1-2 colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with pT1-2 colorectal cancer between January 1999 to January 2005 were included. Chi-square test and multivariable logistic analysis were performed to evaluate risk factors associated with lymph node metastasis. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Tumor location and depth of invasion were independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis(P<0.01 and P<0.05). Gender, age, tumor gross pattern, tumor differentiation, carcinoembryonic antigen level, and tumor diameter were not associated with lymph node metastasis. Lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis on postoperative follow-up were independent risk factors for survival(P<0.05 and P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Factors associated with lymph node metastasis in pT1-2 colorectal cancer do not affect the survival. However, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis are predictive for survival.

摘要

目的

探讨T1-2期结直肠癌患者淋巴结转移及预后的相关因素。

方法

纳入1999年1月至2005年1月期间的pT1-2期结直肠癌患者。采用卡方检验和多变量逻辑分析来评估与淋巴结转移相关的危险因素。使用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox回归模型分析生存结局。

结果

肿瘤位置和浸润深度是淋巴结转移的独立危险因素(P<0.01和P<0.05)。性别、年龄、肿瘤大体形态、肿瘤分化程度、癌胚抗原水平和肿瘤直径与淋巴结转移无关。术后随访中的淋巴结转移和远处转移是生存的独立危险因素(P<0.05和P<0.01)。

结论

pT1-2期结直肠癌中与淋巴结转移相关的因素不影响生存。然而,淋巴结转移和远处转移可预测生存。

相似文献

1
[Analysis of risk factors associated with lymph node metastasis and prognosis of T1-2 colorectal cancer].[T1-2期结直肠癌淋巴结转移及预后相关危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Apr;14(4):245-8.
2
Metastatic potential in T1 and T2 colorectal cancer.T1和T2期结直肠癌的转移潜能
Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 Nov-Dec;52(66):1688-91.
3
Predictive factors affecting survival in stage II colorectal cancer: is lymph node harvesting relevant?影响 II 期结直肠癌生存的预测因素:淋巴结清扫是否相关?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Nov;53(11):1517-23. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f20116.
4
[Rule of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer and its affecting factors].[结直肠癌淋巴结转移规律及其影响因素]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007 May;10(3):257-60.
5
Is there a rationale to record lymphatic invasion in node-positive colorectal cancer?淋巴结阳性结直肠癌中记录淋巴血管侵犯是否有依据?
J Clin Pathol. 2012 Sep;65(9):847-50. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-200817. Epub 2012 May 8.
6
[Associated risk factors of peritoneal metastasis in colorectal cancer].[结直肠癌腹膜转移的相关危险因素]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Apr;14(4):254-6.
7
Curative resection of T1 colorectal carcinoma: risk of lymph node metastasis and long-term prognosis.T1期结直肠癌的根治性切除:淋巴结转移风险及长期预后
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Jun;48(6):1182-92. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0935-y.
8
Mismatch repair system and p53 expression in patients with T1 and T2 colorectal cancer: predictive role of lymph node metastasis and survival.T1 和 T2 结直肠癌患者错配修复系统和 p53 表达:淋巴结转移和生存的预测作用。
J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun;109(8):848-52. doi: 10.1002/jso.23592. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
9
A novel data-driven prognostic model for staging of colorectal cancer.一种用于结直肠癌分期的新型数据驱动预后模型。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Nov;213(5):579-588, 588.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
10
Analysis of pathological risk factors for lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer.结直肠癌淋巴结转移的病理危险因素分析
Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 May-Jun;56(91-92):663-6.