Einspieler R, Ebner F, Hofmann H M, Ranner G, Tamussino K, Justich E
Universitätsklinik für Radiologie, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.
Rofo. 1990 Jan;152(1):67-70. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1046819.
In a prospective study the results of FIGO staging and MR staging in uterine cervical carcinoma were compared with the findings of stepwise serial examination of en-bloc-resected specimens in 28 patients. Overall accuracy of MR staging was 59% compared to 41% in FIGO staging. Sensitivity in assessing parametrial tumour extension was 85% in MRI and 64% in clinical examination. Specificity was 74% in MRI and 69% in physical examination. Accuracy in parametrial tumour extension was 67 per cent in FIGO-Classification and 80 per cent in MRI.
在一项前瞻性研究中，对28例宫颈癌患者进行了国际妇产科联盟（FIGO）分期和磁共振成像（MR）分期的结果，与整块切除标本的逐步系列检查结果进行了比较。MR分期的总体准确率为59%，而FIGO分期为41%。在评估宫旁组织肿瘤浸润方面，MRI的敏感性为85%，临床检查为64%。MRI的特异性为74%，体格检查为69%。FIGO分类中宫旁组织肿瘤浸润的准确率为67%，MRI为80%。
