Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48207, USA.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2011 Jun;21(2):148-66. doi: 10.1007/s11065-011-9169-7. Epub 2011 May 4.
Identification of children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) is difficult because information regarding prenatal exposure is often lacking, a large proportion of affected children do not exhibit facial anomalies, and no distinctive behavioral phenotype has been identified. Castellanos and Tannock have advocated going beyond descriptive symptom-based approaches to diagnosis to identify biomarkers derived from cognitive neuroscience. Classical eyeblink conditioning and magnitude comparison are particularly promising biobehavioral markers of FASD-eyeblink conditioning because a deficit in this elemental form of learning characterizes a very large proportion of alcohol-exposed children; magnitude comparison because it is a domain of higher order cognitive function that is among the most sensitive to fetal alcohol exposure. Because the neural circuitry mediating both these biobehavioral markers is well understood, they have considerable potential for advancing understanding of the pathophysiology of FASD, which can contribute to development of treatments targeted to the specific deficits that characterize this disorder.
鉴定胎儿酒精谱系障碍(FASD)的儿童具有一定难度,因为通常缺乏有关产前暴露的信息,很大一部分受影响的儿童没有表现出面部异常,也没有确定独特的行为表型。Castellanos 和 Tannock 主张超越基于描述性症状的诊断方法,以确定源自认知神经科学的生物标志物。经典的眨眼条件反射和幅度比较是 FASD-眨眼条件反射特别有前途的生物行为标志物,因为这种基本形式的学习缺陷是很大一部分暴露于酒精的儿童的特征;幅度比较是因为它是高级认知功能领域,对胎儿酒精暴露最敏感。由于介导这两种生物行为标志物的神经回路得到了很好的理解,它们在提高对 FASD 病理生理学的理解方面具有相当大的潜力,这有助于针对该疾病的特定缺陷开发有针对性的治疗方法。