• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

取消决策审查委员会。最终规则。

Eliminating the Decision Review Board. Final rules.

出版信息

Fed Regist. 2011 May 3;76(85):24802-12.

PMID:21542396
Abstract

We are eliminating the Decision Review Board (DRB) portions of part 405 of our rules, which we currently use as the final step in our administrative review process for adjudicating initial disability claims in our Boston region. As of the effective date of this regulation, we will replace the DRB step with review by the Appeals Council. The Appeals Council will follow most of the rules in parts 404 and 416 that we use in the rest of the country to adjudicate disability claims at the Appeals Council level, with some differences needed to accommodate the rules that govern administrative law judge (ALJ) hearings in the Boston region. We will also authorize attorney advisors in the Boston region to conduct certain prehearing proceedings and make fully favorable decisions as they do in the rest of the country. We are making these changes to improve service to claimants and to increase consistency in our program rules.

摘要

我们正在取消规则第405部分中的决策审查委员会(DRB)环节,目前我们将其用作波士顿地区对初始残疾索赔进行行政审查程序的最后一步。自本规定生效之日起,我们将用上诉委员会的审查取代DRB环节。上诉委员会将遵循我们在该国其他地区用于在上诉委员会层面裁定残疾索赔的第404和416部分中的大多数规则,但需要一些差异以适应波士顿地区管理行政法法官(ALJ)听证会的规则。我们还将授权波士顿地区的律师顾问进行某些听证前程序,并像在该国其他地区一样做出完全有利的决定。我们做出这些改变是为了改善对索赔人的服务,并提高我们项目规则的一致性。

相似文献

1
Eliminating the Decision Review Board. Final rules.取消决策审查委员会。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2011 May 3;76(85):24802-12.
2
Amendments to procedures for certain determinations and decisions. Final rules.某些确定和决定程序的修订。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2011 Oct 21;76(204):65366-71.
3
Extension of effective date for temporary pilot program setting the time and place for a hearing before an administrative law judge. Final rule.关于设定行政法法官听证会时间和地点的临时试点计划生效日期的延期。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2013 Jul 29;78(145):45451-2.
4
Rules on determining hearing appearances. Final rule.关于确定听证出庭的规则。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2013 May 21;78(98):29624-8.
5
Extension of sunset date for attorney advisor program. Final rule.律师顾问计划日落日期的延长。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2013 Jul 29;78(145):45459-60.
6
Setting the time and place for a hearing before an administrative law judge. Final rules.确定在行政法法官面前举行听证会的时间和地点。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2010 Jul 8;75(130):39154-61.
7
Disability determinations by state agency disability examiners. Final rules.州机构残疾审查员做出的残疾判定。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2010 Oct 13;75(197):62676-84.
8
Amendments to the quick disability determination process. Final rule.快速残疾判定程序修订案。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2007 Sep 6;72(172):51173-9.
9
Ensuring Program Uniformity at the Hearing and Appeals Council Levels of the Administrative Review Process. Final rule.确保行政复议程序中听证和上诉委员会层面的程序一致性。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2016 Dec 16;81(242):90987-97.
10
General bias and Administrative Law Judges: is there a remedy for Social Security disability claimants?一般偏见与行政法法官:社会保障残疾索赔人有补救办法吗?
Cornell Law Rev. 2005 Mar;90(3):869-809.