• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于产时早期胎儿监测的胎儿声刺激试验

Fetal acoustic stimulation test for early intrapartum fetal monitoring.

作者信息

Goonewardene M, Hanwellage K

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, Galle, Sri Lanka.

出版信息

Ceylon Med J. 2011 Mar;56(1):14-8. doi: 10.4038/cmj.v56i1.2889.

DOI:10.4038/cmj.v56i1.2889
PMID:21542428
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The fetal acoustic stimulation test (FAST) is a simple cost effective screening test for antenatal fetal monitoring. The aim of the study was to evaluate the FAST as a screening test for early intrapartum fetal well being.

METHODS

An initial non stress test (NST) followed by a FAST using corometric model 146 was carried out in 486 participants in early labour with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies and > 32 weeks gestation. A repeat NST was recorded in the participants who had an initial non reactive NST. The results of the NST and FAST were compared with fetal outcome. Maternal perception of fetal movements after FAST, results of NST before and after FAST, and the babies' 5 minute APGAR scores were measured.

RESULTS

Of the 486 participants 413 (85%) noticed fetal movements after FAST. Initial NST was non reactive in 203 (42%) but 149 (31%) became reactive after FAST. Compared to the NST, FAST had a better sensitivity (97% vs 62%, p < 0.001), specificity (100% vs 87%, p = 0.017), positive predictive value (100% vs 98%, p = 0.024), negative predictive value (79% vs 17%, p < 0.001) and accuracy (99%vs 64%, p < 0.001) in predicting 5 minute APGAR < 7 in the baby.

CONCLUSIONS

FAST is a reliable screening test for assessing fetal well being in early labour. It complements the NST and is better than the NST alone.

摘要

引言

胎儿声刺激试验(FAST)是一种用于产前胎儿监测的简单且经济有效的筛查试验。本研究的目的是评估FAST作为产程早期胎儿健康状况的筛查试验。

方法

对486例妊娠≥32周、单胎妊娠且产程早期无并发症的参与者进行了初始无应激试验(NST),随后使用146型宫缩压力计模型进行FAST。对初始NST无反应的参与者记录重复NST。将NST和FAST的结果与胎儿结局进行比较。测量了FAST后母亲对胎儿活动的感知、FAST前后NST的结果以及婴儿的5分钟阿氏评分。

结果

486例参与者中,413例(85%)在FAST后察觉到胎儿活动。初始NST无反应的有203例(42%),但149例(31%)在FAST后变为有反应。与NST相比,在预测婴儿5分钟阿氏评分<7方面,FAST具有更好的敏感性(97%对62%,p<0.001)、特异性(100%对87%,p = 0.017)、阳性预测值(100%对98%,p = 0.024)、阴性预测值(79%对17%,p<0.001)和准确性(99%对64%,p<0.001)。

结论

FAST是评估产程早期胎儿健康状况的可靠筛查试验。它补充了NST,且比单独使用NST更好。

相似文献

1
Fetal acoustic stimulation test for early intrapartum fetal monitoring.用于产时早期胎儿监测的胎儿声刺激试验
Ceylon Med J. 2011 Mar;56(1):14-8. doi: 10.4038/cmj.v56i1.2889.
2
The fetal acoustic stimulation test: a reliable and cost effective method of antepartum fetal monitoring.胎儿声刺激试验:一种可靠且经济高效的产前胎儿监测方法。
Ceylon Med J. 2005 Dec;50(4):156-9. doi: 10.4038/cmj.v50i4.1406.
3
Clinical study on detecting false non-reactive of non-stress test by improved acoustic stimulation.改良声刺激检测无应激试验假无反应的临床研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Aug;284(2):271-4. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1621-z. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
4
Fetal acoustic stimulation for rapid intrapartum assessment of fetal well-being.
J Med Assoc Thai. 1993 Nov;76(11):606-12.
5
Search for the most predictive tests of fetal well-being in early labor.寻找产程早期胎儿健康状况最具预测性的检查。
J Perinat Med. 1996;24(3):199-206. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1996.24.3.199.
6
Vibro-acoustic stimulation in high-risk pregnancies; maternal perception of fetal movements, fetal heart rate and fetal outcome.高危妊娠中的振动声学刺激;母亲对胎动、胎儿心率及胎儿结局的感知
J Perinat Med. 1992;20(4):267-74. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1992.20.4.267.
7
Maternal perception of sound provoked fetal movement for antepartum assessment of fetal well-being.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 1997 Dec;23(6):537-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.1997.tb00883.x.
8
Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. III. Predictive value of a reactive test.
J Reprod Med. 1988 Feb;33(2):217-8.
9
An evaluation of antenatal fetal acoustic stimulation.产前胎儿听觉刺激的评估。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991 Jul 1;40(2):97-103. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(91)90099-7.
10
Evaluation of the effects of acoustic stimulation and feeding mother stimulation on non-reactive non-stress test: a randomized clinical trial.评估声刺激和哺乳母亲刺激对无反应无应激试验的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Jun;287(6):1105-10. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2695-6. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies for intrapartum foetal surveillance in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.低、中收入国家产时胎儿监测策略:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 26;13(10):e0206295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206295. eCollection 2018.
2
Comparison of the Effects of Two Auditory Methods by Mother and Fetus on the Results of Non-Stress Test (Baseline Fetal Heart Rate and Number of Accelerations) in Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.两种由母亲和胎儿进行的听觉方法对孕妇无应激试验结果(基线胎心率和加速次数)的影响比较:一项随机对照试验
J Family Reprod Health. 2016 Mar;10(1):27-34.