Suppr超能文献

卡维地洛与奈必洛尔治疗轻至中度原发性高血压的降压疗效比较:一项随机试验

Comparison of antihypertensive efficacy of carvedilol and nebivolol in mild-to-moderate primary hypertension: a randomized trial.

作者信息

Erdoğan Okan, Ertem Bülent, Altun Armağan

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2011 Jun;11(4):310-3. doi: 10.5152/akd.2011.081. Epub 2011 May 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study is to compare the antihypertensive effects of carvedilol and nebivolol in mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients.

METHODS

It is a prospective; placebo-controlled, cross-over, double-blind, randomized, single-center clinical trial. Patients (n=20) who were first diagnosed with mild to moderate systemic hypertension according to mean ambulatory blood pressure measurements > 130/85 mmHg and no previous antihypertensive therapy were prospectively enrolled into the study. After 10 days of placebo run-in period, they were randomized within the same group as cross-over design to one month carvedilol 25 mg and one month nebivolol 5 mg regimen given once daily in the morning. The primary outcome variables were systolic and diastolic blood pressures determined by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements. Mutlivariate analysis of variance for repeated measurements with 3x2 factorial design was used for statistical analysis of results.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 6 women and 14 men whose mean age was 42.9±12.8 years (range 19-63 years). Mean heart rate was significantly decreased after commencing both carvedilol (70.2±5.2 bpm) and nebivolol (64.9±3.9 bpm) treatments compared to placebo (78.8±5.2 bpm) (p<0.05). Both carvedilol (133.8±9/86.6±8.6 mmHg) and nebivolol (134±8.7/85.6±7.4 mmHg) significantly decreased mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures compared to placebo (143.9±8.9/94.4±9.2 mmHg), respectively (p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in decreasing either systolic or diastolic blood pressure between nebivolol and carvedilol therapies (p>0.05). No side effects were recorded during both carvedilol and nebivolol treatments.

CONCLUSION

Although both carvedilol and nebivolol effectively decreased blood pressure compared to placebo, they showed similar efficacy for lowering blood pressure.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较卡维地洛和奈必洛尔对轻至中度高血压患者的降压效果。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、安慰剂对照、交叉、双盲、随机、单中心临床试验。根据动态血压测量平均值>130/85 mmHg且既往未接受过抗高血压治疗,首次诊断为轻至中度系统性高血压的患者(n = 20)被前瞻性纳入研究。经过10天的安慰剂导入期后,他们按照交叉设计在同一组内随机分为接受为期1个月的每日早晨一次服用25 mg卡维地洛方案和为期1个月的每日早晨一次服用5 mg奈必洛尔方案。主要结局变量为由24小时动态血压测量确定的收缩压和舒张压。采用3×2析因设计的重复测量多元方差分析对结果进行统计分析。

结果

研究组由6名女性和14名男性组成,平均年龄为42.9±12.8岁(范围19 - 63岁)。与安慰剂组(78.8±5.2次/分钟)相比,开始卡维地洛(70.2±5.2次/分钟)和奈必洛尔(64.9±3.9次/分钟)治疗后平均心率均显著降低(p<0.05)。与安慰剂组(143.9±8.9/94.4±9.2 mmHg)相比,卡维地洛组(133.8±9/86.6±8.6 mmHg)和奈必洛尔组(134±8.7/85.6±7.4 mmHg)的平均收缩压和舒张压均显著降低(p<0.05)。然而,奈必洛尔和卡维地洛治疗在降低收缩压或舒张压方面无显著差异(p>0.05)。在卡维地洛和奈必洛尔治疗期间均未记录到副作用。

结论

尽管与安慰剂相比,卡维地洛和奈必洛尔均能有效降低血压,但它们在降低血压方面显示出相似的疗效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验