Anesthesia Service, Clement J Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI 53295, USA.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Oct;25(5):761-5. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 May 4.
The h-index allows the evaluation of scholarly output in academics, but this bibliometric statistic has not been applied extensively to measure productivity in anesthesiology. The authors tested the hypothesis that the h-index is dependent on academic rank, American College of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accreditation of the training program, and National Board of Echocardiography credentials in perioperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in United States academic cardiothoracic anesthesiologists.
Observational.
Internet analysis.
United States academic cardiothoracic anesthesiologists.
None.
Faculty members from 30 randomly selected fellowship programs with or without accreditation were identified using the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists web site. The status of each faculty member's credentials in perioperative TEE was defined using the "verify certification" function on the National Board of Echocardiography web site. Publications, citations, citations/publication, and the h-index for each faculty member were obtained using Scopus. Two hundred fifty-nine cardiothoracic anesthesiologists (204 men and 55 women) were identified (8 instructors [3%], 123 assistant professors [48%], 56 associate professors [22%], 63 professors [24%], and 9 chairpersons [3%]). The average cardiothoracic anesthesiologist had an h-index of 6 ± 7 with 28 ± 46 publications, 499 ± 988 total citations, and 13 ± 18 citations per publication. The h-index increased significantly (p < 0.05) among ranks (instructors [1 ± 1], assistant professors [3 ± 3], associate professors [7 ± 5], professors [12 ± 8], and chairpersons [18 ± 13]). Significant differences in the number of publications and total citations also were observed among ranks. Differences in the h-index among ranks were observed regardless of program accreditation status or transesophageal echocardiographic credentials. Faculty members working in American College of Graduate Medical Education-accredited programs had more publications and citations and higher h-indices than their counterparts in programs that were not accredited. Except for program directors, the scholarly output of academic cardiothoracic anesthesiologists with or without transesophageal echocardiographic credentials was similar within each academic rank.
The results show that the h-index increases progressively with academic rank and is dependent on fellowship program accreditation status but not transesophageal echocardiographic credentials in United States academic cardiothoracic anesthesiologists.
h 指数可用于评估学术界的学术产出,但该文献计量统计指标尚未广泛用于衡量美国麻醉学领域培训计划的生产力。作者检验了以下假设,即 h 指数取决于学术职称、研究生医学教育学院(ACGME)对培训计划的认证,以及美国心胸麻醉科医生围手术期经食管超声心动图(TEE)的国家超声心动图委员会认证。
观察性研究。
互联网分析。
美国心胸麻醉科医生。
无。
使用心血管麻醉师协会网站,随机选择 30 个研究金计划中的参与者(有或没有认证)。使用国家超声心动图委员会网站的“验证认证”功能确定每位教员在围手术期 TEE 中的认证状态。使用 Scopus 获取每位教员的出版物、引文、引文/出版物和 h 指数。确定了 259 名心胸麻醉师(204 名男性和 55 名女性)(8 名讲师[3%]、123 名助理教授[48%]、56 名副教授[22%]、63 名教授[24%]和 9 名主席[3%])。平均心胸麻醉师的 h 指数为 6±7,出版物为 28±46 篇,总引文为 499±988 篇,每篇论文的引文为 13±18 篇。h 指数在职称(讲师[1±1]、助理教授[3±3]、副教授[7±5]、教授[12±8]和主席[18±13])之间显著增加(p<0.05)。还观察到职称之间的出版物数量和总引文也存在显著差异。无论计划认证状态或经食管超声心动图认证如何,职称之间的 h 指数差异都存在。在经 ACGME 认证的计划中工作的教员的出版物和引文数量以及 h 指数均高于未获得认证的教员。除了项目主任外,具有或不具有经食管超声心动图认证的学术心胸麻醉师的学术产出在每个学术职称内相似。
结果表明,h 指数随着学术职称的提高而逐渐增加,并且取决于研究金计划的认证状态,但不取决于美国学术心胸麻醉科医生的经食管超声心动图认证。