Center for Health Promotion, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo , São Paulo, Brasil.
J Dent Educ. 2011 May;75(5):672-8.
The objective of this study was to compare the impact on knowledge and counseling skills of face-to-face and Internet-based oral health training programs on medical students. Participants consisted of 148 (82 percent) of the 180 invited students attending their fifth academic year at the Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Brasil, in 2007. The interventions took place during a three-month training period in the clinical Center for Health Promotion, which comprised part of a clerkship in Internal Medicine. The students were divided into four groups: 1) Control Group (Control), with basic intervention; 2) Brochure Group (Br), with basic intervention plus complete brochure with oral health themes; 3) Cybertutor Group (Cy), with basic intervention plus access to an Internet-based training program about oral health themes; and 4) Cybertutor + Contact Group (Cy+C), the same as Cy plus brief proactive contact with a tutor. The impact of these interventions on student knowledge was measured with pre- and post assessments, and student skills in asking and counseling about oral health were assessed with an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Multivariate logistic regression models were applied to identify the odds ratios of scoring above Control's medians on the final assessment and the OSCE. In the results, Cy+C performed significantly better than Control on both the final assessment (OR 9.4; 95% CI 2.7-32.8) and the OSCE (OR 5.6; 95% CI 1.9-16.3) and outperformed all the other groups. The Cy+C group showed the most significant increase in knowledge and the best skills in asking and counseling about oral health.
本研究的目的是比较面对面和基于互联网的口腔健康培训计划对医学生知识和咨询技能的影响。参与者包括 2007 年巴西圣保罗大学医学院 180 名受邀学生中的 148 名(82%)。干预措施发生在临床健康促进中心的三个月培训期间,这是内科实习的一部分。学生被分为四组:1)对照组(Control),进行基础干预;2)手册组(Br),进行基础干预加完整的口腔健康主题手册;3)网络导师组(Cy),进行基础干预加访问基于互联网的口腔健康主题培训计划;4)网络导师+联系组(Cy+C),与 Cy 相同,外加与导师进行简短的主动联系。通过预评估和后评估来衡量这些干预措施对学生知识的影响,并通过客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)评估学生在询问和咨询口腔健康方面的技能。应用多变量逻辑回归模型来确定在最终评估和 OSCE 上得分高于对照组中位数的几率比。结果显示,Cy+C 在最终评估(OR 9.4;95%CI 2.7-32.8)和 OSCE(OR 5.6;95%CI 1.9-16.3)上的表现均明显优于对照组,且优于其他所有组。Cy+C 组的知识增长最为显著,在询问和咨询口腔健康方面的技能也最好。