Department of Soil, Environmental, and Atmospheric Sciences, School of Natural Resources and Center for Agroforestry, School of Natural Resources, University Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
J Environ Qual. 2011 May-Jun;40(3):800-6. doi: 10.2134/jeq2010.0168.
Despite increased attention and demand for the adoption of agroforestry practices throughout the world, rigorous long-term scientific studies confirming environmental benefits from the use of agroforestry practices are limited. The objective was to examine nonpoint-source pollution (NPSP) reduction as influenced by agroforestry buffers in watersheds under grazing and row crop management. The grazing study consists of six watersheds in the Central Mississippi Valley wooded slopes and the row crop study site consists of three watersheds in a paired watershed design in Central Claypan areas. Runoff water samples were analyzed for sediment, total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) for the 2004 to 2008 period. Results indicate that agroforestry and grass buffers on grazed and row crop management sites significantly reduce runoff, sediment, TN, and TP losses to streams. Buffers in association with grazing and row crop management reduced runoff by 49 and 19%, respectively, during the study period as compared with respective control treatments. Average sediment loss for grazing and row crop management systems was 13.8 and 17.9 kg ha yr, respectively. On average, grass and agroforestry buffers reduced sediment, TN, and TP losses by 32, 42, and 46% compared with the control treatments. Buffers were more effective in the grazing management practice than row crop management practice. These differences could in part be attributed to the differences in soils, management, and landscape features. Results from this study strongly indicate that agroforestry and grass buffers can be designed to improve water quality while minimizing the amount of land taken out of production.
尽管全世界对采用农林复合经营做法的关注度和需求都在增加,但确认农林复合经营做法对环境带来益处的严格长期科学研究仍然有限。本研究的目的是检验在放牧和条播作物管理下,农林复合缓冲带对非点源污染(NPSP)的削减效果。放牧研究包括密西西比河谷中部林地陡坡的 6 个流域,条播作物研究则是在中央黏土区采用配对流域设计的 3 个流域。2004 年至 2008 年期间,对径流水样进行了泥沙、总氮(TN)和总磷(TP)分析。结果表明,在放牧和条播作物管理区,农林复合和草地缓冲带能显著减少径流、泥沙、TN 和 TP 向溪流的流失。与对照处理相比,研究期间,缓冲带与放牧和条播作物管理相结合,分别减少了 49%和 19%的径流量。放牧和条播作物管理系统的平均泥沙流失量分别为 13.8 和 17.9kg·ha-1·yr-1。与对照处理相比,草地和农林复合缓冲带分别减少了 32%、42%和 46%的泥沙、TN 和 TP 流失。缓冲带在放牧管理实践中的效果优于条播作物管理实践。这些差异部分归因于土壤、管理和景观特征的差异。本研究结果强烈表明,可以设计农林复合和草地缓冲带来改善水质,同时将生产用地的损失降到最低。