TNO Geological Survey of the Netherlands, TA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Contam Hydrol. 2012 Jan 1;127(1-4):30-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
Quantitative insight into the reaction capacity of porous media is necessary to assess the buffering capacity of the subsurface against contaminant input via groundwater recharge. Here, reaction capacity is to be considered as a series of geochemical characteristics that control acid/base conditions, redox conditions and sorption intensity. Using existing geochemical analyses, a statistical regional assessment of the reaction capacity was performed for two geologically different areas in the Netherlands. The first area is dominated by Pleistocene aquifer sediments only, in the second area a heterogeneous Holocene confining layer is found on top of the Pleistocene aquifer sediments. Within both areas, two or more regions can be distinguished that have a distinctly different geological build-up of the shallow subsurface. The reactive compounds considered were pyrite, reactive Fe other than pyrite, sedimentary organic matter, carbonate and clay content. This characterization was complemented by the analysis of a dataset of samples newly collected, from two regions within the Pleistocene area, where the sedimentary facies of samples was additionally distinguished. The statistical assessment per area was executed at the levels of region, geological formation and lithology class. For both areas, significant differences in reaction capacities were observed between: 1. different lithology classes within a geological formation in a single region, 2. identical geological formations in different regions and 3. various geological formations within a single region. Here, the reaction capacity is not only controlled by lithostratigraphy, but also by post-depositional diagenesis and paleohydrology. Correlation coefficients among the reactive compounds were generally higher for sand than for clay, but insufficiently high to allow good estimation of reactive compounds from each other. For the sandy Pleistocene aquifer sediments, the content of reactive compounds was frequently observed to be below detection limits. From this, future characterization of sediment reaction capacity is best performed at the sublevel of lithology class, being the geochemically near-uniform unit identifiable for individual geological formations within geographic regions. Additional subdivision on facies provides particular insight in the spatial entity where relatively high reaction capacities may be encountered. To obtain quantitative insight into the reaction capacity of aquifer sediments, non-sandy minor subunits should be well characterised on their reaction capacity as well as their spatial occurrence in the geological formations. A straightforward approach is presented in which the regional statistics on geochemical reactivity become combined with a 3-dimensional geological voxel model. This results into 3-dimensional data fields on reactivity, which are suitable for, for example, groundwater transport modelling. The sedimentological architecture of the deposits becomes well maintained in the geochemical data field, which is an advantage in itself.
定量了解多孔介质的反应能力对于评估地下水补给引起的污染物输入对地下环境的缓冲能力是必要的。在这里,反应能力被认为是一系列控制酸碱条件、氧化还原条件和吸附强度的地球化学特征。利用现有的地球化学分析,对荷兰两个地质上不同地区的反应能力进行了统计区域评估。第一个地区仅由更新世含水层沉积物组成,第二个地区在更新世含水层沉积物之上发现了一个异质的全新世隔水层。在这两个地区,都可以区分出两个或更多具有明显不同浅层地下地质结构的区域。考虑的反应性化合物为黄铁矿、非黄铁矿的反应性铁、沉积有机质、碳酸盐和粘土含量。这一特征还通过对更新世地区两个区域新采集的样本数据集的分析得到了补充,其中还区分了样本的沉积相。每个地区的反应能力统计评估都是在区域、地质地层和岩性级别上进行的。对于这两个地区,在以下方面观察到反应能力的显著差异:1. 单个区域内地质地层中的不同岩性级别;2. 不同地区的相同地质地层;3. 单个区域内的各种地质地层。在这里,反应能力不仅受岩性地层控制,还受后生沉积作用和古水文学控制。反应性化合物之间的相关系数一般在砂中比在粘土中更高,但不足以从彼此中很好地估计反应性化合物。对于更新世含水层的砂质沉积物,经常观察到反应性化合物的含量低于检测限。由此可见,未来对沉积物反应能力的特征描述最好在岩性级别以下进行,因为在地理区域内的各个地质地层中,可以识别出化学上接近均匀的单位。在相的基础上进行进一步细分,可以深入了解可能遇到相对高反应能力的空间实体。为了定量了解含水层沉积物的反应能力,非砂质次要亚单位应很好地描述其反应能力以及它们在地质地层中的空间分布。这里提出了一种直接的方法,即将区域地球化学反应统计数据与三维地质体素模型相结合。这导致了反应性的三维数据场,可用于例如地下水运移建模。沉积物的沉积结构在地球化学数据场中得到了很好的保留,这本身就是一个优势。