Suppr超能文献

比较纤维蛋白胶、可吸收管和缝线在周围神经修复中的应用。

Comparison of fibrin glue, bioresorbable tubing and sutures in peripheral nerve repair.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153 (U.S.A.).

出版信息

Restor Neurol Neurosci. 1991 Jan 1;3(2):75-80. doi: 10.3233/RNN-1991-3204.

Abstract

Regeneration of severed rat tibial nerves was functionally and morphologically compared with repair following the use of 3 anastomosis techniques: collagen guide tubes, fibrin glue and conventional microsurgical sutures. In addition, one tibial nerve was crushed in some rats. At ten weekly intervals, functional recovery, assessed by sciatic nerve stimulated evoked contraction of the flexor digitorum muscle, was quicker and more complete following nerve crush than following the anastomosis techniques which were not different from each other. Ten weeks following the surgery, the retrograde transport morphological technique indicated that the anastomosis techniques were not different from each other. The number of labeled tibial motoneurons (tube and suture groups) was significantly less than the crush group, but the glue group was intermediate. Thus, although having less extensive recovery following crush, the quicker and easier techniques of nerve repair, i.e., collagen tubes or fibrin glue, produced comparable anatomical and functional recovery as the more time-consuming, technically demanding microsurgical repair with fine sutures.

摘要

切断的大鼠胫骨神经的再生在功能和形态上与使用 3 种吻合技术(胶原引导管、纤维蛋白胶和传统显微缝合)后的修复进行了比较:胶原引导管、纤维蛋白胶和传统显微缝合。此外,在一些大鼠的一条胫骨神经被压碎。在 10 周的时间间隔内,通过坐骨神经刺激引起的屈趾肌收缩来评估功能恢复,神经压碎后的恢复速度更快,更完全,而吻合技术之间没有差异。手术后 10 周,逆行转运形态学技术表明,吻合技术之间没有差异。标记的胫骨运动神经元(管和缝合组)的数量明显少于压碎组,但胶组介于两者之间。因此,尽管在压碎后恢复的范围较小,但更快、更容易的神经修复技术,即胶原管或纤维蛋白胶,与更耗时、技术要求更高的精细缝线显微修复产生了可比的解剖和功能恢复。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验