Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center, Waltham, MA, Neurology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Neurology Department, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 1995 Jan 1;8(1):21-34. doi: 10.3233/RNN-1995-81207.
A number of virus vectors have been developed for gene delivery to the nervous system. Virus vectors still provide the most efficient means of gene delivery, and this is critical as only a small volume of inoculum can be used without damaging neurons. Each of the four types of vectors currently in use have their advantages and disadvantages. Highest titers can be achieved with herpes virus and adenovirus vectors, with retrovirus and adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors currently yielding lower titers. The transgene capacity of each from highest to lowest is: herpes virus (30 kb), adenovirus (8-10 kb), retrovirus (7-8 kb) and AAV (4.5 kb). All can infect a broad range of cell types in the nervous system, including neurons, glia and endothelial cells. Herpes, adenovirus and AAV vectors can deliver genes to postmitotic, as well as mitotic cells, while retrovirus vectors depend on cell mitosis for gene delivery. Herpes virus can assume a stable extrachromosomal configuration in the nuclei of some neurons (termed latency), while both retrovirus and AAV can integrate into the cell genome. Both integrate at random sites, but AAV can also integrate at a specific chromosomal location. Adenovirus neither assumes a stable state nor integrates, still its genome can persist and be expressed in the host cell for some time (up to a month or so). Stability of gene expression is a problem for all the vectors, due in part to the use of viral promoters which tend to be down-regulated by the host cell over a month or so. Both herpes virus vectors and adenovirus vectors have some toxicity in their current configurations, while retrovirus and AAV tend to be associated with less neuropathogenicity. Many developments in vectors should be occurring over the next few years that should increase the potential of these vectors for therapeutic gene delivery.
已经开发了许多病毒载体用于向神经系统递基因。病毒载体仍然提供了最有效的基因递递方法,这一点至关重要,因为如果不损伤神经元,只能使用少量接种物。目前使用的四种类型的载体都有其优缺点。疱疹病毒和腺病毒载体可获得最高滴度,而逆转录病毒和腺相关病毒(AAV)载体目前的滴度较低。从最高到最低的转染基因容量分别为:疱疹病毒(30kb)、腺病毒(8-10kb)、逆转录病毒(7-8kb)和 AAV(4.5kb)。所有这些载体都可以感染神经系统中的广泛细胞类型,包括神经元、神经胶质细胞和内皮细胞。疱疹病毒、腺病毒和 AAV 载体可以将基因递送至有丝分裂后和有丝分裂细胞,而逆转录病毒载体依赖于细胞有丝分裂来递基因。疱疹病毒可以在一些神经元的核内形成稳定的染色体外结构(称为潜伏),而逆转录病毒和 AAV 都可以整合到细胞基因组中。两者都随机整合到基因组中,但 AAV 也可以整合到特定的染色体位置。腺病毒既不形成稳定状态也不整合,但它的基因组可以在宿主细胞中持续存在并表达一段时间(长达一个月左右)。所有载体的基因表达稳定性都是一个问题,部分原因是使用了病毒启动子,这些启动子在一个月左右的时间内往往会被宿主细胞下调。目前的疱疹病毒载体和腺病毒载体都有一些毒性,而逆转录病毒和 AAV 则与较少的神经致病性相关。在未来几年内,载体的许多发展应该会增加这些载体用于治疗性基因递递的潜力。