• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自付额全额保障政策的影响:来自支付方视角的定性研究

Policy implications of first-dollar coverage: a qualitative examination from the payer perspective.

机构信息

NORC at University of Chicago, 4350 East West Hwy., Ste. 800, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 2011 May-Jun;126(3):394-9. doi: 10.1177/003335491112600313.

DOI:10.1177/003335491112600313
PMID:21553668
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3072861/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Immunization against potentially life-threatening illnesses for children and adults has proved to be one of the great public health successes of the 20th century and is extremely cost-effective. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act includes a number of provisions to increase coverage and access to immunizations for the consumer, including a provision for health plans to cover all Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices-recommended vaccines at first dollar, or without cost sharing. In this study, we examined payers' perspectives on first-dollar coverage of vaccines and strategies to improve vaccination rates.

METHODS

This was a qualitative study, using a literature review and semistructured expert interviews with payers.

RESULTS

Four key themes emerged, including (1) the cost implications of the first-dollar change; (2) the importance of examining barriers to children, adolescents, and adults separately to focus interventions more strategically; (3) the importance of provider knowledge and education in increasing immunization; and (4) the effect of first-dollar coverage on those who decline vaccination for personal reasons.

CONCLUSIONS

We determined that, while reducing financial barriers through first-dollar coverage is an important first step to increasing immunization rates, there are structural and cultural barriers that also will require collaborative, strategic work among all vaccine stakeholders.

摘要

目的

预防儿童和成人面临生命威胁的疾病的免疫接种已被证明是 20 世纪公共卫生的巨大成就之一,而且极具成本效益。《患者保护与平价医疗法案》包含了若干增加免疫接种覆盖率和可及性的条款,包括要求健康计划按首笔费用(或无费用分担)支付所有免疫实践咨询委员会推荐的疫苗。在这项研究中,我们研究了支付方对疫苗首笔费用覆盖的看法以及提高疫苗接种率的策略。

方法

这是一项定性研究,使用文献回顾和对支付方的半结构式专家访谈。

结果

出现了 4 个关键主题,包括:(1) 首笔费用变化的成本影响;(2) 分别检查儿童、青少年和成年人的障碍以更具战略性地集中干预措施的重要性;(3) 提高免疫接种率的提供者知识和教育的重要性;以及(4) 首笔费用覆盖对因个人原因拒绝接种疫苗者的影响。

结论

我们确定,虽然通过首笔费用覆盖来降低经济障碍是提高免疫接种率的重要第一步,但仍存在结构性和文化性障碍,这也需要所有疫苗利益相关者之间的协作和战略性工作。

相似文献

1
Policy implications of first-dollar coverage: a qualitative examination from the payer perspective.自付额全额保障政策的影响:来自支付方视角的定性研究
Public Health Rep. 2011 May-Jun;126(3):394-9. doi: 10.1177/003335491112600313.
2
How might immunization rates change if cost sharing is eliminated?如果取消费用分担,免疫接种率会如何变化?
Public Health Rep. 2014 Jan-Feb;129(1):39-46. doi: 10.1177/003335491412900107.
3
Role of health insurance in financing vaccinations for children and adolescents in the United States.医疗保险在美国为儿童和青少年接种疫苗提供资金的作用。
Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124 Suppl 5:S522-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1542L.
4
An economic framework for preventive care advice.预防性护理建议的经济框架。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Nov;33(11):2034-40. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0873.
5
Recent proposals to limit Medigap coverage and modify Medicare cost sharing.近期关于限制补充医疗保险覆盖范围及调整医疗保险费用分担的提议。
Issue Brief George Wash Univ Natl Health Policy Forum. 2012 Feb 24(845):1-19.
6
Out-of-pocket costs of childhood immunizations: a comparison by type of insurance plan.儿童免疫接种的自付费用:按保险计划类型进行的比较。
Pediatrics. 2007 Nov;120(5):e1148-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3654.
7
Billing and payment of commercial and Medicaid health plan adult vaccination claims in Michigan since the Affordable Care Act.密歇根州自《平价医疗法案》以来商业和医疗补助健康计划成人疫苗接种索赔的计费和支付情况。
Vaccine. 2019 Oct 23;37(45):6803-6813. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.09.042. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
8
Immunization and the Affordable Care Act.免疫接种与《平价医疗法案》。
NCSL Legisbrief. 2011 Apr-May;19(20):1-2.
9
Influence of insurance status and vaccine cost on physicians' administration of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine.保险状况和疫苗成本对医生接种肺炎球菌结合疫苗的影响。
Pediatrics. 2003 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):521-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.3.521.
10
Financing vaccines for adolescents: a position paper of the society for adolescent health and medicine.为青少年接种疫苗提供资金:青少年健康与医学学会的立场文件。
J Adolesc Health. 2011 Mar;48(3):320-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.12.025.

本文引用的文献

1
Vaccination in the United States: payer perspective on the working group and its recommendations.美国的疫苗接种:付款方对工作组及其建议的看法。
Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124 Suppl 5:S565-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1542R.
2
Financing vaccination of children and adolescents: National Vaccine Advisory Committee recommendations.儿童和青少年疫苗接种的资金筹集:国家疫苗咨询委员会的建议。
Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124 Suppl 5:S558-62. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1542P.
3
National, state, and local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13-17 years--United States, 2008.2008年美国13至17岁青少年的全国、州和地方疫苗接种覆盖率
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 Sep 18;58(36):997-1001.
4
Vaccine adherence in adolescents.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2009 Oct;48(8):801-11. doi: 10.1177/0009922809336360. Epub 2009 May 29.
5
How can immunization coverage in urban counties be improved? A pilot study of a Kansas county.如何提高城市县的免疫接种覆盖率?堪萨斯州一个县的试点研究。
Am J Infect Control. 2009 Jun;37(5):423-425. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.07.005.
6
Vaccine financing in the United States: an emerging crisis.美国的疫苗融资:一场新出现的危机。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 May;163(5):485-7. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.70.
7
When and why children fall behind with vaccinations: missed visits and missed opportunities at milestone ages.儿童何时以及为何疫苗接种滞后:错过就诊时机以及在关键年龄错过接种机会。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Feb;36(2):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.035. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
8
Improving immunization rates: initial results from a team-based, systems change approach.
Am J Med Qual. 2008 May-Jun;23(3):176-83. doi: 10.1177/1062860608314938.
9
Introduction: strengthening the delivery of new vaccines for adolescents.引言:加强青少年新型疫苗的接种工作。
Pediatrics. 2008 Jan;121 Suppl 1:S1-4. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1115a.
10
Gaps in vaccine financing for underinsured children in the United States.美国未充分投保儿童疫苗融资方面的缺口。
JAMA. 2007 Aug 8;298(6):638-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.6.638.