• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拉考沙胺治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫儿童系列病例的经验。

Experience with lacosamide in a series of children with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Neurol. 2011 Jun;44(6):414-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2010.12.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2010.12.003
PMID:21555051
Abstract

We report our pediatric experience with lacosamide, a new antiepileptic drug, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as adjunctive therapy in focal epilepsy in patients more than 17 years old. We retrospectively reviewed charts for lacosamide use and seizure frequency outcome in patients with focal epilepsy (Wilcoxon signed rank test). Sixteen patients (7 boys) were identified (median dose 275 mg daily, 4.7 mg/kg daily; mean age 14.9 years, range 8-21 years). Patients were receiving a median of 2 antiepileptic drugs (interquartile range [IQR] 1.7-3) in addition to having undergone previous epilepsy surgery (n=3), vagus nerve stimulation (n=9), and ketogenic diet (n=3). Causes included structural (encephalomalacia and diffuse encephalitis, 1 each; stroke in 2) and genetic abnormalities (Aarskog and Rett syndromes, 1 each) or cause not known (n=10). Median seizure frequency at baseline was 57 per month (IQR 7-75), and after a median follow-up of 4 months (range 1-13 months) of receiving lacosamide, it was 12.5 per month (IQR 3-75), (P<0.01). Six patients (37.5%; 3 seizure free) were classified as having disease that responded to therapy (≥50% reduction seizure frequency) and 10 as having disease that did not respond to therapy (<50% in 3; increase in 1; unchanged in 6). Adverse events (tics, behavioral disturbance, seizure worsening, and depression with suicidal ideation in 1 patient each) prompted lacosamide discontinuation in 4/16 (25%). This retrospective study of 16 children with drug-resistant focal epilepsy demonstrated good response to adjunctive lacosamide therapy (median seizure reduction of 39.6%; 37.5% with ≥50% seizure reduction) without severe adverse events.

摘要

我们报告了我们在小儿科使用拉考沙胺的经验,这是一种新的抗癫痫药物,已被美国食品和药物管理局批准作为 17 岁以上局灶性癫痫患者的附加治疗药物。我们回顾性地分析了使用拉考沙胺的图表和癫痫发作频率的结果(Wilcoxon 符号秩检验)。确定了 16 例患者(7 名男性)(中位数剂量 275mg/天,4.7mg/kg/天;平均年龄 14.9 岁,范围 8-21 岁)。患者正在接受中位数为 2 种抗癫痫药物(四分位距[IQR]1.7-3),此外还进行了以前的癫痫手术(n=3)、迷走神经刺激(n=9)和生酮饮食(n=3)。病因包括结构性(脑软化和弥漫性脑炎各 1 例;2 例中风)和遗传异常(Aarskog 和 Rett 综合征各 1 例)或病因不明(n=10)。基线时的中位癫痫发作频率为每月 57 次(IQR7-75),在接受拉考沙胺中位数 4 个月(范围 1-13 个月)的中位随访后,为每月 12.5 次(IQR3-75),(P<0.01)。6 例患者(37.5%;3 例无癫痫发作)被归类为对治疗有反应(癫痫发作频率降低≥50%),10 例对治疗无反应(3 例降低<50%;1 例增加;6 例无变化)。不良反应(抽搐、行为障碍、癫痫恶化和 1 例有自杀意念的抑郁症)促使 4/16(25%)例患者停用拉考沙胺。这项对 16 例耐药性局灶性癫痫儿童的回顾性研究表明,辅助拉考沙胺治疗效果良好(中位数癫痫发作减少 39.6%;37.5%癫痫发作减少≥50%),且无严重不良反应。

相似文献

1
Experience with lacosamide in a series of children with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.拉考沙胺治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫儿童系列病例的经验。
Pediatr Neurol. 2011 Jun;44(6):414-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2010.12.003.
2
Lacosamide as an adjunctive therapy in pediatric patients with refractory focal epilepsy.拉科酰胺作为难治性局灶性癫痫患儿的辅助治疗药物。
Brain Dev. 2014 Jun;36(6):510-5. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
3
Efficacy and safety of lacosamide as an adjunctive therapy for refractory focal epilepsy in paediatric patients: a retrospective single-centre study.拉科酰胺作为小儿难治性局灶性癫痫辅助治疗的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Epileptic Disord. 2015 Dec;17(4):436-43. doi: 10.1684/epd.2015.0782.
4
Lacosamide in refractory mixed pediatric epilepsy: a prospective add-on study.拉考酰胺用于难治性小儿混合性癫痫:一项前瞻性附加治疗研究。
J Child Neurol. 2012 Apr;27(4):492-5. doi: 10.1177/0883073812436741.
5
Adjunctive lacosamide in clinical practice: sodium blockade with a difference?辅助左乙拉西坦的临床应用:钠通道阻滞,有何不同?
Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Nov;22(3):499-504. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.07.035. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
6
Long-term safety and efficacy in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures treated with adjunctive lacosamide: results from a Phase III open-label extension trial.拉科酰胺辅助治疗未控制部分发作性癫痫患者的长期安全性和疗效:III 期开放标签扩展试验结果。
Epilepsia. 2012 Mar;53(3):521-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03407.x.
7
Preliminary efficacy and safety of lacosamide in children with refractory epilepsy.拉考沙胺治疗儿童难治性癫痫的初步疗效和安全性。
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2012 Jan;16(1):15-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2011.08.007. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
8
Adjunctive lacosamide for partial-onset seizures: Efficacy and safety results from a randomized controlled trial.辅助使用拉科酰胺治疗部分性发作:一项随机对照试验的疗效和安全性结果。
Epilepsia. 2009 Mar;50(3):443-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01951.x. Epub 2009 Jan 17.
9
Efficacy and safety of lacosamide in infants and young children with refractory focal epilepsy.拉考沙胺治疗婴儿和幼儿难治性局灶性癫痫的疗效和安全性。
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2014 Jan;18(1):55-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
10
Efficacy of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in children with refractory epilepsy.拉科酰胺作为难治性癫痫患儿辅助治疗的疗效。
J Child Neurol. 2014 Jan;29(1):23-7. doi: 10.1177/0883073812462887. Epub 2012 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Age and Concurrent Antiseizure Medication Use on Lacosamide Dose to Concentration Ratio and Dosing in Pediatric Patients.年龄及同时使用抗癫痫药物对小儿患者拉科酰胺剂量浓度比及给药的影响
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Oct;29(5):514-524. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.5.514. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
2
Effectiveness and Safety of Lacosamide, A Third-generation Anti-seizure Medication, for Poststroke Seizure and Epilepsy: A Literature Review.拉科酰胺作为第三代抗癫痫药物治疗脑卒中后发作和癫痫的有效性和安全性:文献综述。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2023;21(10):2126-2133. doi: 10.2174/1570159X21666230616114255.
3
Efficacy of Lacosamide Add-on Therapy on Refractory Focal Epilepsies in Children and Adolescents: An Open-Label Clinical Trial.
拉科酰胺辅助治疗儿童和青少年难治性局灶性癫痫的疗效:一项开放标签临床试验。
J Res Pharm Pract. 2023 Mar 24;11(3):109-115. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_86_21. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
4
Efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in patients with focal-onset seizures: an observational, prospective study.拉考沙胺作为局灶性发作癫痫患者辅助治疗的疗效和耐受性:一项观察性、前瞻性研究。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2023 Jun;123(3):1081-1087. doi: 10.1007/s13760-023-02236-8. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
5
Phenytoin-associated movement disorder: A literature review.苯妥英钠相关运动障碍:文献综述
Tzu Chi Med J. 2022 Oct 3;34(4):409-417. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_74_22. eCollection 2022 Oct-Dec.
6
Use of lacosamide in children: experience of a tertiary medical care center in Brazil.拉科酰胺在儿童中的应用:巴西一家三级医疗保健中心的经验。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2022 Nov;80(11):1090-1096. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758366. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
7
Response of focal refractory status epilepticus to lacosamide in an infant.婴儿局灶性耐药性癫痫持续状态对拉科酰胺的反应。
BMJ Case Rep. 2022 Apr 29;15(4):e249948. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2022-249948.
8
Movement disorders associated with antiseizure medications: A systematic review.抗癫痫药物相关运动障碍:系统评价。
Epilepsy Behav. 2022 Jun;131(Pt A):108693. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108693. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
9
Impact of Physical Activity and Medication Adherence on the Seizure Frequency and Quality of Life of Epileptic Patients: A Population Study in West Texas.身体活动和药物依从性对德克萨斯州西部癫痫患者癫痫发作频率和生活质量的影响:一项人群研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jan 18;2022:4193664. doi: 10.1155/2022/4193664. eCollection 2022.
10
Safety and Tolerability of Lacosamide in Patients With Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.拉科酰胺在癫痫患者中的安全性和耐受性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Sep 20;12:694381. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.694381. eCollection 2021.