• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[结直肠癌筛查:勃林格殷格翰公司一项健康预防计划的成本效益分析]

[Screening for colorectal cancer: a cost benefit analysis on a health prevention programme at the Boehringer Ingelheim Company].

作者信息

Schneider M, Häck H-J

机构信息

Werksärztlicher Dienst Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG, Ingelheim.

出版信息

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2011 May;136(20):1047-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1275840. Epub 2011 May 10.

DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1275840
PMID:21560104
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In Germany, approximately 70.000 people are diagnosed with colorectal cancer every year. With early diagnosis the recovery rates are over 90 % and early intervention can significantly reduce the costs of medical treatment as well as the economic losses from worker productivity. We here present the organisational procedure for bowel cancer screening and have weighed the costs against benefits to employees, the company and the healthcare system. The screening costs are compared with economic benefits.

METHODS

The target group for the study consisted of all 11.536 employees at the company's site in Germany. Volunteers were given a standardized questionnaire about the risk factors for colorectal cancers and an immunological fecal occult blood test (IFOBT). If risk factors for development of colorectal cancer were present or if the test result was positive, a colonoscopy was recommended in accordance with DGVS guidelines (German Society of Digestive and Metabolic diseases).

RESULTS

A total of 4.287 employees (37.2 %) indicated an interest in undergoing screening; at the end of the period 3.958 complete datasets (2.296 men and 1.662 women, mean age 51.2 years) were available for evaluation. A colonoscopy was performed on 114 persons. Six cases of overt cancer were detected with three in the 36 - 50 age group and three in the 51 - 65 age group. Five of the six cases were stage T1 or T2. Adenomatous polyps were found and removed in 29 persons. The calculated cost benefit ratio was 1:2 for the company and 1:35 for the public health system.

CONCLUSION

Using the example of colorectal screening, this study represents a cost benefit analysis of this preventative health measure in a company environment. The results show that even while taking into account the financial and personal commitment required, the cost benefit ratio is positive both for the company and for the healthcare system.

摘要

背景与目的

在德国,每年约有7万人被诊断出患有结直肠癌。早期诊断的康复率超过90%,早期干预可显著降低医疗成本以及因员工生产力下降造成的经济损失。我们在此介绍肠癌筛查的组织流程,并权衡了对员工、公司和医疗系统的成本与收益。将筛查成本与经济效益进行了比较。

方法

该研究的目标群体为该公司德国工厂的所有11536名员工。为志愿者提供了一份关于结直肠癌风险因素的标准化问卷以及一项免疫粪便潜血试验(IFOBT)。如果存在结直肠癌发病的风险因素或检测结果呈阳性,则根据德国消化和代谢疾病学会(DGVS)的指南建议进行结肠镜检查。

结果

共有4287名员工(37.2%)表示有兴趣接受筛查;在该阶段结束时,有3958个完整数据集(2296名男性和1662名女性,平均年龄51.2岁)可供评估。对114人进行了结肠镜检查。检测出6例显性癌症,其中3例在36 - 50岁年龄组,3例在51 - 65岁年龄组。6例中的5例为T1或T2期。在29人身上发现并切除了腺瘤性息肉。计算得出公司的成本效益比为1:2,公共卫生系统的成本效益比为1:35。

结论

本研究以结直肠癌筛查为例,对公司环境下的这一预防性健康措施进行了成本效益分析。结果表明,即使考虑到所需的资金和个人投入,成本效益比对于公司和医疗系统都是正向的。

相似文献

1
[Screening for colorectal cancer: a cost benefit analysis on a health prevention programme at the Boehringer Ingelheim Company].[结直肠癌筛查:勃林格殷格翰公司一项健康预防计划的成本效益分析]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2011 May;136(20):1047-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1275840. Epub 2011 May 10.
2
[Precautions for intestinal cancer in the workplace. An initiative for secondary prevention in the BASF joint-stock company].[工作场所中肠癌的预防措施。巴斯夫股份公司的二级预防倡议]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2004 Feb 6;129(6):239-43. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-817998.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.亚洲结直肠肿瘤筛查及结直肠癌管理的成本效益分析
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Aug 1;28(3):353-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03726.x.
4
Screening for colorectal cancer: which test can we afford?结直肠癌筛查:我们负担得起哪种检测?
Z Gastroenterol. 2008 Apr;46 Suppl 1:S38-40. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963482.
5
A loss-effectiveness analysis of risk-adapted surveillance after colorectal polypectomy.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2000;77:395-8.
6
The relevance of unrelated costs internal and external to the healthcare sector to the outcome of a cost-comparison analysis of secondary prevention: the case of general colorectal cancer screening in the German population.无关成本的相关性,包括卫生保健部门内外的成本,对二级预防成本比较分析结果的影响:以德国人群普通结直肠癌筛查为例。
Eur J Health Econ. 2010 Apr;11(2):141-50. doi: 10.1007/s10198-009-0156-3. Epub 2009 May 17.
7
Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography or fecal blood tests.结直肠癌筛查中计算机断层结肠成像与粪便潜血试验的成本效益比较。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Nov;22(11):1372-9. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32833eaa71.
8
[Early detection of bowel cancer in occupational surveillance examinations: switching from a guaiak-based to an immunochemical fecal occult blood test].职业健康检查中结直肠癌的早期检测:从基于愈创木脂的粪便潜血试验转向免疫化学粪便潜血试验
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2014 Jan;139(3):79-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1349588. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
9
The case for population-based screening for colorectal cancer.基于人群的结直肠癌筛查理由。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Jan;2(1):65-70. doi: 10.1038/nrc705.
10
Choice of screening modality in a colorectal cancer education and screening program for the uninsured.针对未参保人群的结直肠癌教育与筛查项目中筛查方式的选择
J Cancer Educ. 2006 Spring;21(1):43-9. doi: 10.1207/s15430154jce2101_14.