Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;27(4):364-74. doi: 10.1002/gps.2723. Epub 2011 May 10.
We examined the effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on cognitive decline as a function of phase of pre-clinical Alzheimer disease.
Given recent findings that cognitive decline accelerates as clinical diagnosis is approached, we used rate of decline as a proxy for phase of pre-clinical Alzheimer disease. We fit growth mixture models of Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) Examination trajectories with data from 2388 participants in the Alzheimer's Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial and included class-specific effects of naproxen and celecoxib.
We identified three classes: "no decline", "slow decline", and "fast decline", and examined the effects of celecoxib and naproxen on linear slope and rate of change by class. Inclusion of quadratic terms improved fit of the model (-2 log likelihood difference: 369.23; p < 0.001) but resulted in reversal of effects over time. Over 4 years, participants in the slow-decline class on placebo typically lost 6.6 3MS points, whereas those on naproxen lost 3.1 points (p-value for difference: 0.19). Participants in the fast-decline class on placebo typically lost 11.2 points, but those on celecoxib first declined and then gained points (p-value for difference from placebo: 0.04), whereas those on naproxen showed a typical decline of 24.9 points (p-value for difference from placebo: <0.0001).
Our results appeared statistically robust but provided some unexpected contrasts in effects of different treatments at different times. Naproxen may attenuate cognitive decline in slow decliners while accelerating decline in fast decliners. Celecoxib appeared to have similar effects at first but then attenuated change in fast decliners.
我们研究了非甾体抗炎药对认知能力下降的影响,这种影响取决于临床前阿尔茨海默病的阶段。
鉴于最近的研究发现,认知能力下降在临床诊断前会加速,我们使用下降率作为临床前阿尔茨海默病阶段的替代指标。我们利用 2388 名阿尔茨海默病抗炎预防试验参与者的改良迷你精神状态检查(3MS)轨迹数据拟合了增长混合模型,并包括了萘普生和塞来昔布的特定类别效应。
我们确定了三个类别:“无下降”、“缓慢下降”和“快速下降”,并按类别检查了塞来昔布和萘普生对线性斜率和变化率的影响。纳入二次项提高了模型的拟合度(-2 对数似然差:369.23;p<0.001),但导致了随着时间的推移效应的逆转。在 4 年的时间里,安慰剂组中缓慢下降类别的参与者通常会失去 6.6 个 3MS 点,而服用萘普生的参与者会失去 3.1 个点(差异的 p 值:0.19)。安慰剂组中快速下降类别的参与者通常会失去 11.2 个点,但服用塞来昔布的参与者首先下降然后恢复,而服用萘普生的参与者则出现了典型的 24.9 个点下降(差异的 p 值:<0.0001)。
我们的结果在统计学上似乎是稳健的,但在不同时间、不同治疗方法的效果上提供了一些意外的对比。萘普生可能会减缓缓慢下降者的认知能力下降,而加速快速下降者的下降。塞来昔布最初似乎有类似的效果,但随后减缓了快速下降者的变化。