Tikaria Anurag, Kabra Madhulika, Gupta Neerja, Sapra Savita, Balakrishnan Prahlad, Gulati Sheffali, Pandey R M, Gupta A K
Department of Paediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110029, India.
Natl Med J India. 2010 Nov-Dec;23(6):324-9.
Global developmental delay is a common reason for referral to a paediatrician. We examined the aetiological yield of an extensive diagnostic work-up in young children with developmental delay in a tertiary referral centre.
To assess the diagnostic possibilities, we systematically examined 100 consecutive children with global developmental delay (< 5 years of age) who visited the paediatric outpatient department over a period of 18 months. An association between the presence of features at initial contact and aetiology was analysed by the 2-tailed Fisher exact test and chi-square test.
Of the 100 children, 65 were < 2 years of age (mean age 23.6 months) at presentation. The presence of birth asphyxia, sepsis, seizures, abnormal neurological findings, and dysmorphism were significant predictors of aetiology. Four diagnostic categories--chromosomal disorders including Down syndrome, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, multiple malformation syndromes and cerebral dysgenesis--were the most common causes of global development delay in 20%, 15%, 14% and 11%, respectively. Moderate delay was seen in 42%, severe in 33% and mild in 25% of the patients. The aetiological yield did not differ with the severity of global developmental delay. Additional investigations such as neuroimaging, cytogenetic analysis, metabolic tests and specific molecular tests contributed to a diagnosis in 73% of the children, while in 23% these were the sole means of arriving at a diagnosis. Neuroimaging for a specific indication was almost twice more likely to yield an aetiology when compared with neuroimaging performed as a screening tool (65% v. 35%; p = 0.003).
The aetiological yield in this selected cohort with global developmental delay was 73%. A step-wise investigational approach is justified in all children with developmental delay, regardless of the severity of delay or the absence of findings on history and physical examination. This study is an attempt to formulate an investigative approach in a child with global developmental delay, especially in developing countries where advanced molecular and cytogenetic studies are not routinely available.
全球发育迟缓是转诊至儿科医生处的常见原因。我们在一家三级转诊中心对患有发育迟缓的幼儿进行了全面诊断检查,以探究其病因诊断率。
为评估诊断可能性,我们系统检查了在18个月期间就诊于儿科门诊的100例连续的全球发育迟缓(<5岁)儿童。通过双侧Fisher精确检验和卡方检验分析初次就诊时特征的存在与病因之间的关联。
100例儿童中,65例就诊时年龄<2岁(平均年龄23.6个月)。出生时窒息、败血症、癫痫发作、异常神经学表现和畸形是病因的重要预测因素。四类诊断——包括唐氏综合征在内的染色体疾病、缺氧缺血性脑病、多发畸形综合征和脑发育不全——分别是全球发育迟缓最常见的原因,占比分别为20%、15%、14%和11%。42%的患者为中度发育迟缓,33%为重度,25%为轻度。病因诊断率与全球发育迟缓的严重程度无关。神经影像学、细胞遗传学分析、代谢测试和特定分子测试等额外检查有助于73%的儿童做出诊断,而在23%的儿童中,这些检查是做出诊断的唯一手段。与作为筛查工具进行的神经影像学检查相比,针对特定指征进行的神经影像学检查发现病因的可能性几乎高出一倍(65%对35%;p = 0.003)。
在这个选定的全球发育迟缓队列中,病因诊断率为73%。对于所有发育迟缓儿童,无论发育迟缓的严重程度如何,也无论病史和体格检查是否有异常发现,采用逐步检查方法都是合理的。本研究旨在为全球发育迟缓儿童制定一种检查方法,尤其是在那些无法常规开展先进分子和细胞遗传学研究的发展中国家。