• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

80 岁及以上患者的 A 型主动脉夹层外科修复的当代结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Contemporary results after surgical repair of type A aortic dissection in patients aged 80 years and older: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Cardio-thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Nov;40(5):1058-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.03.044. Epub 2011 May 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.03.044
PMID:21561787
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The benefits of surgical treatment of type A aortic dissection (AAD) in patients aged 80 years and older are questioned by the perceived high operative risk of these patients. This issue has been investigated in the present meta-analysis of observational studies.

METHODS

Studies on surgical repair of AAD in patients aged 80 years and older were identified up to January 2011. The results were expressed as pooled proportions with 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

RESULTS

Pooled analysis showed that patients aged 80 years and older included in six studies had a significantly higher risk of immediate postoperative mortality compared with younger patients (risk ratio 2.32, 95% CI 1.47-3.66, p<0.0001, pooled estimates 45.7% vs 19.5%). Analysis of data retrieved from nine studies reporting on the results of surgical treatment of AAD in a total of 308 patients aged 80 years and older showed a pooled mortality rate of 36.7% (95% CI 23.8-51.8%, 111/308 patients). The pooled stroke rate was 11.9% (95% CI 7.3-18.7%, 37/347 patients). Pooled analysis of data from two studies evaluating patients surgically or medically treated showed a non-significant reduced risk of immediate postoperative death after surgery (risk ratio 0.42, 95% CI 0.14-1.29, pooled estimates: 25.2% vs 59.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate postoperative survival rates after surgery for AAD in patients aged 80 years and older are satisfactory. These findings suggest a confident approach toward emergency repair of AAD in this fragile patient population. More data on the intermediate survival and quality of life of these patients are, however, needed to better establish the role of emergency surgery for AAD in octogenarians and nonagenarians.

摘要

目的

由于 80 岁及以上高龄患者的手术风险较高,人们对手术治疗 A 型主动脉夹层(AAD)的获益产生了质疑。本研究通过对观察性研究的荟萃分析对此问题进行了探讨。

方法

截至 2011 年 1 月,检索关于 80 岁及以上高龄患者 AAD 手术治疗的研究。结果以合并后 95%可信区间(95%CI)表示。

结果

共纳入 6 项研究,荟萃分析显示高龄患者术后即刻病死率显著高于年轻患者(风险比 2.32,95%CI 1.47-3.66,p<0.0001,合并后估计值 45.7% vs 19.5%)。9 项研究报道了共 308 例 80 岁及以上高龄患者的 AAD 手术治疗结果,其中 111 例(36.7%)死亡;荟萃分析显示,该组患者的死亡率为 36.7%(95%CI 23.8-51.8%,111/308 例)。347 例患者中,卒中发生率为 11.9%(95%CI 7.3-18.7%,37/347 例)。2 项研究评估了手术和内科治疗患者,荟萃分析显示手术治疗后即刻病死率降低,但差异无统计学意义(风险比 0.42,95%CI 0.14-1.29,合并后估计值:25.2% vs 59.0%)。

结论

80 岁及以上高龄患者 AAD 手术后的即刻生存率令人满意。这些发现提示在这一脆弱患者群体中,可对 AAD 进行积极的急诊修复。但需要更多关于该组患者的中期生存和生活质量的数据,以更好地确定高龄患者 AAD 的急诊手术治疗地位。

相似文献

1
Contemporary results after surgical repair of type A aortic dissection in patients aged 80 years and older: a systematic review and meta-analysis.80 岁及以上患者的 A 型主动脉夹层外科修复的当代结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Nov;40(5):1058-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.03.044. Epub 2011 May 10.
2
Endovascular treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.破裂性腹主动脉瘤的血管内治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 26;5(5):CD005261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005261.pub4.
3
The outcomes of aortic arch repair between open surgical repair and debranching endovascular hybrid surgical repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.开放手术修复与去分支血管腔内杂交手术修复主动脉弓的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun;79(6):1510-1524. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.12.025. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
4
Outcome after open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients>80 years old: a systematic review and meta-analysis.80 岁以上患者腹主动脉瘤破裂开放修复术后的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2011 Jul;35(7):1662-70. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1103-x.
5
Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.老年人髋关节囊外骨折的手术干预:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 10;2(2):CD013405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013405.pub2.
6
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
7
Outcome of patients with open and endovascular repair in acute complicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and comparative studies.急性复杂性B型主动脉夹层开放手术修复与血管腔内修复患者的结局:病例系列和对照研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2010 Oct;51(5):613-32.
8
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia for postoperative cognitive outcomes in elderly people undergoing non-cardiac surgery.非心脏手术老年患者术后认知结局:静脉麻醉维持与吸入麻醉维持的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 21;8(8):CD012317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012317.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Management and outcomes of thoracic dissection in older adults.老年患者胸主动脉夹层的管理与预后
Semin Vasc Surg. 2025 Sep;38(3):234-242. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2025.06.004. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
Outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection repair in patients under the age of 75 versus 75 and older.75岁及以下与75岁及以上患者急性A型主动脉夹层修复的结果。
Perfusion. 2025 Jan 3:2676591241313170. doi: 10.1177/02676591241313170.
3
Survival after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection in octogenarians.八旬老人急性A型主动脉夹层手术后的生存情况。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024 Nov 28;21(11):1015-1025. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2024.11.009.
4
Acute type A aortic dissection features and outcomes in octogenarians: a propensity score analysis.八旬老人急性A型主动脉夹层的特征与预后:一项倾向评分分析
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024 Mar 29;38(4). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae038.
5
Baseline risk factors of in-hospital mortality after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection: an ERTAAD study.急性A型主动脉夹层手术后院内死亡的基线风险因素:一项ERTAAD研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jan 15;10:1307935. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1307935. eCollection 2023.
6
2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022 ACC/AHA 血管疾病诊断与管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会联合委员会临床实践指南的报告。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Nov;166(5):e182-e331. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.04.023. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
7
2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022 ACC/AHA 血管疾病诊断与管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-e393. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
8
2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022 ACC/AHA 血管疾病诊断与管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2022 Dec 13;146(24):e334-e482. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001106. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
9
Age, sex, and contemporary outcomes in surgical repair of type A aortic dissection: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample.年龄、性别与A型主动脉夹层手术修复的当代结局:来自全国住院患者样本的见解
JTCVS Open. 2022 Jun 23;11:23-36. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.06.013. eCollection 2022 Sep.
10
Outcomes of surgery for acute type A dissection in octogenarians versus non-octogenarians: a systematic review and meta analysis.80 岁以上与非 80 岁以上急性 A 型夹层患者手术治疗结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Sep 1;17(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01980-x.