Suppr超能文献

腺苷负荷心血管磁共振与多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图对低危胸痛患者的预后价值。

Prognostic value of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance and dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with low-risk chest pain.

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

出版信息

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Apr;28(4):803-12. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9885-3. Epub 2011 May 12.

Abstract

Excluding obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) as the etiology of acute chest pain in patients without diagnostic electrocardiographic changes or elevated serum cardiac biomarkers is challenging. Stress testing is a valuable risk-stratifying technique reserved for the subset of these patients with low-risk chest pain who have an intermediate clinical probability of obstructive CAD. Given the risks of radiation inherent to nuclear and computed tomography imaging, both adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (AS-CMR) imaging and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) are attractive alternative stress modalities. An essential characteristic of stress modalities is their negative prognostic value; as one must exclude clinically-relevant CAD such that patients can be discharged safely. Therefore, the aim of this study was to validate a favorable negative prognostic value for both AS-CMR and DSE in patients presenting with low-risk acute chest pain. This retrospective study included 255 patients with low-risk acute chest pain and no prior history of CAD presenting to the emergency department at our institution, with 89 patients evaluated by AS-CMR and 166 by DSE. Median follow-up was 292 days, and consisted of medical record review. The primary end-point was the composite of cardiac death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, obstructive CAD on invasive coronary angiography (ICA) or recurrent chest pain requiring hospital admission. Test characteristics such as sensitivity and specificity could not be evaluated as patients were not routinely evaluated with ICA. All patients completed the stress protocol without adverse events during testing. 82/89 patients (92.1%) and 164/166 patients (98.8%) had negative AS-CMR and DSE studies, respectively. Both AS-CMR and DSE had excellent negative prognostic values for the primary endpoint, 100 and 99%, respectively. Both AS-CMR and DSE are effective stress modalities for excluding clinically significant coronary artery disease in patients presenting acute low-risk chest pain. Patients without findings to suggest ischemia have an excellent intermediate-term prognosis.

摘要

排除非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)作为无诊断性心电图改变或血清心脏标志物升高的急性胸痛患者的病因具有挑战性。应激试验是一种有价值的风险分层技术,适用于低危胸痛且阻塞性 CAD 临床可能性为中危的这些患者亚组。鉴于核素和计算机断层成像固有存在辐射风险,腺苷应激心血管磁共振(AS-CMR)成像和多巴酚丁胺应激超声心动图(DSE)都是有吸引力的替代应激方式。应激方式的一个基本特征是其阴性预后价值;因为必须排除临床上相关的 CAD,以便患者能够安全出院。因此,本研究的目的是验证 AS-CMR 和 DSE 在低危急性胸痛患者中的有利阴性预后价值。这项回顾性研究纳入了 255 例在我院急诊科就诊的低危急性胸痛且无 CAD 既往史的患者,其中 89 例接受 AS-CMR 检查,166 例接受 DSE 检查。中位随访时间为 292 天,包括病历回顾。主要终点是心脏死亡、非致死性急性心肌梗死、有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)显示阻塞性 CAD 或因胸痛复发需要住院的复合终点。由于患者未常规接受 ICA 评估,因此无法评估测试特征(如敏感性和特异性)。所有患者均在无不良事件的情况下完成了应激方案。89 例患者中的 82 例(92.1%)和 166 例患者中的 164 例(98.8%)的 AS-CMR 和 DSE 检查结果均为阴性。AS-CMR 和 DSE 对主要终点的阴性预后价值均为 100%和 99%。AS-CMR 和 DSE 均是在急性低危胸痛患者中排除有临床意义的冠状动脉疾病的有效应激方式。没有提示缺血的患者具有极好的中期预后。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验