Department of Anesthesiology, General Intensive Care and Pain Control, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Anaesthesia. 2011 Jun;66(6):481-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06682.x.
The aim of our study was to compare leakage pressure, ease and time of insertion of the i-gel and the LMA-Unique laryngeal mask airway in patients with mild to moderate obesity during elective short-term surgery. In this prospective, randomised crossover trial, we included patients with a body mass index (BMI) >25 and <35 kg.m(-2) , and , age >18 years, undergoing elective surgery in the supine position with an expected duration of surgery <2 h. Leakage pressures, insertion difficulty, time and number of insertion attempts were evaluated. We included 50 patients consisting of 29 mildly (BMI>25 and < 30 kg.mg(-2) ) and 21 moderately (BMI>30 and < 35 kg.mg(-2) ) obese patients. Mean (SD) leakage pressures were 23.7 (9.2) cmH₂O (i-gel) and 17.4 (7.0) cmH₂O (LMA-Unique) (p<0.01). Subgroup analyses showed leakage pressures of 22.2 (9.4) cmH₂O (i-gel) and 17.5 (7.5) cmH₂O (LMA-Unique) (p=0.013) in the mild subgroup, and 25.7 (8.6) cmH₂O (i-gel) and 17.0 (6.2) cmH₂O (LMA-Unique) (p<0.01), in the moderate subgroup. Insertion of the i-gel was associated with significantly higher leakage pressures compared with the LMA-Unique in mildly and moderately obese patients.
我们的研究目的是比较 i-gel 和 LMA-Unique 喉罩在择期短时间手术的轻至中度肥胖患者中的泄漏压、插入的容易程度和时间。在这项前瞻性、随机交叉试验中,我们纳入了体重指数(BMI)>25 且<35 kg.m(-2) ,年龄>18 岁,在仰卧位接受择期手术且预计手术时间<2 小时的患者。评估了泄漏压、插入难度、时间和插入尝试次数。我们纳入了 50 例患者,其中 29 例轻度肥胖(BMI>25 且<30 kg.mg(-2) )和 21 例中度肥胖(BMI>30 且<35 kg.mg(-2) )。平均(SD)泄漏压分别为 23.7(9.2)cmH₂O(i-gel)和 17.4(7.0)cmH₂O(LMA-Unique)(p<0.01)。亚组分析显示轻度肥胖亚组的泄漏压分别为 22.2(9.4)cmH₂O(i-gel)和 17.5(7.5)cmH₂O(LMA-Unique)(p=0.013),中度肥胖亚组的泄漏压分别为 25.7(8.6)cmH₂O(i-gel)和 17.0(6.2)cmH₂O(LMA-Unique)(p<0.01)。与 LMA-Unique 相比,i-gel 插入时轻度和中度肥胖患者的泄漏压显著升高。