Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Ludwigs Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):1049-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.002. Epub 2011 May 11.
L-[methyl-(11)C]methionine (MET)-positron emission tomography (PET) has a high sensitivity and specificity for imaging of gliomas and metastatic brain tumors. The short half-life of (11)C (20 minutes) limits the use of MET-PET to institutions with onsite cyclotron. O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) is labeled with (18)F (half-life, 120 minutes) and could be used much more broadly. This study compares the uptake of FET and MET in gliomas and metastases, as well as treatment-induced changes. Furthermore, it evaluates the gross tumor volume (GTV) of gliomas defined on PET and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
We examined 42 patients with pretreated gliomas (29 patients) or brain metastases (13 patients) prospectively by FET- and MET-PET on the same day. Uptake of FET and MET was quantified by standardized uptake values. Imaging contrast was assessed by calculating lesion-to-gray matter ratios. Tumor extension was quantified by contouring GTV in 17 patients with brain gliomas. Gross tumor volume on PET was compared with GTV on MRI. Sensitivity and specificity of MET- and FET-PET for differentiation of viable tumor from benign changes were evaluated by comparing the PET result with histology or clinical follow-up.
There was a strong linear correlation between standardized uptake values calculated for both tracers in cortex and lesions: r = 0.78 (p = 0.001) and r = 0.84 (p < 0.001), respectively. Image contrast was similar for MET- and FET-PET (lesion-to-gray matter ratios of 2.36 ± 1.01 and 2.33 ± 0.77, respectively). Mean GTV in 17 glioma patients was not significantly different on MET- and FET-PET. Both MET- and FET-PET delineated tumor tissue outside of MRI changes. Both tracers provided differentiated tumor tissue and treatment-related changes with a sensitivity of 91% at a specificity of 100%.
O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine-PET and MET-PET provide comparable diagnostic information on gliomas and brain metastases. Like MET-PET, FET-PET can be used for differentiation of residual or recurrent tumor from treatment-related changes/pseudoprogression, as well as for delineation of gliomas.
L-[甲基-(11)C]蛋氨酸(MET)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)对脑胶质瘤和脑转移瘤的成像具有较高的灵敏度和特异性。(11)C 的半衰期短(20 分钟),限制了只有具备现场回旋加速器的机构才能使用 MET-PET。O-[2-[(18)F]氟乙基]-L-酪氨酸(FET)用(18)F 标记(半衰期 120 分钟),可以更广泛地使用。本研究比较了 FET 和 MET 在脑胶质瘤和转移瘤中的摄取情况,以及治疗引起的变化。此外,它还评估了基于 PET 和磁共振成像(MRI)定义的脑胶质瘤的大体肿瘤体积(GTV)。
我们前瞻性地对 42 例经预处理的脑胶质瘤(29 例)或脑转移瘤(13 例)患者进行了 FET 和 MET-PET 检查。通过标准化摄取值定量测定 FET 和 MET 的摄取。通过计算病变与灰质的比值来评估成像对比。在 17 例脑胶质瘤患者中,通过轮廓勾画来定量肿瘤的延伸范围。将 PET 上的 GTV 与 MRI 上的 GTV 进行比较。通过将 PET 结果与组织学或临床随访进行比较,评估 MET 和 FET-PET 对区分存活肿瘤与良性变化的敏感性和特异性。
在皮质和病变中,两种示踪剂的标准化摄取值之间存在很强的线性相关性:r = 0.78(p = 0.001)和 r = 0.84(p < 0.001)。MET 和 FET-PET 的图像对比度相似(病变与灰质的比值分别为 2.36 ± 1.01 和 2.33 ± 0.77)。在 17 例脑胶质瘤患者中,MET 和 FET-PET 的平均 GTV 无显著差异。两种示踪剂均能描绘出 MRI 变化之外的肿瘤组织。两种示踪剂都能提供有区别的肿瘤组织和治疗相关的变化,其敏感性为 91%,特异性为 100%。
O-[2-[(18)F]氟乙基]-L-酪氨酸-PET 和 MET-PET 对脑胶质瘤和脑转移瘤提供了类似的诊断信息。与 MET-PET 一样,FET-PET 可用于区分残留或复发性肿瘤与治疗相关的变化/假性进展,以及描绘脑胶质瘤。