Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy.
J Immunol. 2011 Jun 15;186(12):6807-14. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003265. Epub 2011 May 13.
The clinical manipulation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) represents a promising strategy for the regulation of unwanted immune responses. It is now becoming clear that Tregs exert multiple effects on different cell targets under particular conditions; however, the interplay between these different factors remains unclear. Using mouse Tregs of known Ag specificity, we report in this study two different levels of Treg-mediated suppression: one that targets T cell proliferation and one that targets dendritic cell-mediated proinflammatory chemokine (CCL3 and CCL4) production. These two effects can be dissociated, and whereas modulation of T cell proliferation depends on the strength of the antigenic stimulus, modulation of chemokine production by dendritic cells does not. We also provide evidence that the bystander effect of Tregs on immune responses observed in vivo may be in great part explained by a decrease in the recruitment of target T cells, and therefore in the magnitude of the response, rather than by a direct effect on their priming or proliferation. Overall, our results shed some light on the different aspects that need to be considered when attempting to modulate Tregs for clinical purposes.
调节性 T 细胞(Tregs)的临床操作代表了一种有前途的调节不受欢迎的免疫反应的策略。现在越来越清楚的是,Tregs 在特定条件下对不同的细胞靶标发挥多种作用;然而,这些不同因素之间的相互作用尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们使用已知抗原特异性的小鼠 Tregs 报告了 Treg 介导的抑制的两个不同水平:一个针对 T 细胞增殖,另一个针对树突状细胞介导的促炎趋化因子(CCL3 和 CCL4)产生。这两种效应可以分离,并且 T 细胞增殖的调节取决于抗原刺激的强度,而树突状细胞趋化因子产生的调节则不然。我们还提供了证据表明,体内观察到的 Tregs 对免疫反应的旁观者效应可能在很大程度上可以通过减少靶 T 细胞的募集来解释,因此可以减少反应的幅度,而不是对其启动或增殖的直接影响。总的来说,我们的结果阐明了在尝试为临床目的调节 Tregs 时需要考虑的不同方面。