• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
lordif: An R Package for Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Iterative Hybrid Ordinal Logistic Regression/Item Response Theory and Monte Carlo Simulations.lordif:一个用于使用迭代混合有序逻辑回归/项目反应理论和蒙特卡罗模拟检测项目功能差异的R包。
J Stat Softw. 2011 Mar 1;39(8):1-30. doi: 10.18637/jss.v039.i08.
2
Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS®)测评的项目区分度分析:方法、挑战、进展及未来方向。
Psychometrika. 2021 Sep;86(3):674-711. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09775-0. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
3
Evaluation of psychometric properties of the Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI-36) questionnaire using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic: Differential item functioning (DIF).迭代混合有序逻辑:鉴别项目功能(DIF)评估牙科焦虑量表(DAI-36)问卷的心理计量特性。
Brain Behav. 2023 Sep;13(9):e3129. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3129. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
4
Extension of an iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory approach to detect and account for differential item functioning in longitudinal data.迭代混合有序逻辑回归/项目反应理论方法的扩展,用于检测和处理纵向数据中的项目功能差异。
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2013 Apr 1;55(2):127-147.
5
Differential item functioning analysis with ordinal logistic regression techniques. DIFdetect and difwithpar.使用有序逻辑回归技术进行项目功能差异分析。DIFdetect和difwithpar。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S115-23. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245183.28384.ed.
6
An Investigation of Age-Related Differential Item Functioning in the EQ-5D-5L Using Item Response Theory and Logistic Regression.使用项目反应理论和逻辑回归对EQ-5D-5L中与年龄相关的项目差异功能进行的调查。
Value Health. 2022 Sep;25(9):1566-1574. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
7
A Monte Carlo Study of an Iterative Wald Test Procedure for DIF Analysis.用于差异项目功能分析的迭代 Wald 检验程序的蒙特卡罗研究。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Jan;77(1):104-118. doi: 10.1177/0013164416637104. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
8
Item Response Theory With Covariates (IRT-C): Assessing Item Recovery and Differential Item Functioning for the Three-Parameter Logistic Model.带协变量的项目反应理论(IRT-C):评估三参数逻辑斯蒂模型的项目恢复与项目功能差异
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Feb;76(1):22-42. doi: 10.1177/0013164415579488. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
9
Measurement Equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Short Form Items: Application to Ethnically Diverse Cancer and Palliative Care Populations.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)疼痛干扰简表条目的测量等效性:在不同种族癌症和姑息治疗人群中的应用。
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(2):309-352.
10
It Might Not Make a Big DIF: Improved Differential Test Functioning Statistics That Account for Sampling Variability.可能差异不大:改进的差异检验功能统计量,考虑了抽样变异性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Feb;76(1):114-140. doi: 10.1177/0013164415584576. Epub 2015 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of the Parental Food Choice Guilt Scale.父母食物选择内疚量表的编制与验证
Eur J Psychol Assess. 2025 Jul;41(4):319-332. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000800. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
2
Measurement of critical health literacy in primary school pupils: a Polish validation of the Claim Evaluation Tools.小学生关键健康素养的测量:波兰对声明评估工具的验证
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 17;15(7):e099994. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099994.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the NoMAD instrument in cancer care settings: assessing factorial validity, measurement invariance, and differential item functioning.癌症护理环境中NoMAD工具的心理测量学评估:评估因子效度、测量不变性和项目功能差异。
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jun 16;6(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00756-3.
4
The EORTC QLQ-F17 as a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 to assess self-reported functioning in cancer patients: investigating equivalence and psychometric properties in a randomized cross-over trial.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷F17作为欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷C30的简化版,用于评估癌症患者自我报告的功能状况:在一项随机交叉试验中研究等效性和心理测量特性。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jun 3;84:103262. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103262. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Validation of the ecological momentary well-being instrument (EMOWI) in Canadian adolescents.加拿大青少年生态瞬时幸福感量表(EMOWI)的验证
Qual Life Res. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04001-1.
6
Psychometric properties of the Flourishing Scale for South African first-year students.南非一年级学生蓬勃发展量表的心理测量特性。
Afr J Psychol Assess. 2023 Mar 24;5:130. doi: 10.4102/ajopa.v5i0.130. eCollection 2023.
7
Frequency and severity response scales for pain and discomfort: psychometric insights from EQ-HWB.疼痛和不适的频率及严重程度反应量表:来自欧洲生活质量五维度健康量表的心理测量学见解
Qual Life Res. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04003-z.
8
Invariance and item bias of the Mental Health Continuum Short-Form for South African university first-year students.南非大学一年级学生心理健康连续体简表的不变性与项目偏差
Afr J Psychol Assess. 2024 Mar 26;6:143. doi: 10.4102/ajopa.v6i0.143. eCollection 2024.
9
Psychometric properties of the Danish SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in patients with pelvic floor disorders and low back pain: item response theory modelling.丹麦用于盆底功能障碍和腰痛患者共同决策的SDM-Q-9问卷的心理测量特性:项目反应理论建模
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 May 19;25(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03023-6.
10
Validating the satisfaction with life scale among early adolescents: psychometric assessment using item response theory.验证青少年早期生活满意度量表:使用项目反应理论的心理测量评估
Curr Psychol. 2025;44(7):5821-5829. doi: 10.1007/s12144-025-07518-3. Epub 2025 Mar 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger.用于测量患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS®)情感困扰的项目库:抑郁、焦虑和愤怒。
Assessment. 2011 Sep;18(3):263-83. doi: 10.1177/1073191111411667. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
2
Measuring depression levels in HIV-infected patients as part of routine clinical care using the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).作为常规临床护理的一部分,使用九项患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)测量HIV感染患者的抑郁水平。
AIDS Care. 2010 Jul;22(7):874-85. doi: 10.1080/09540120903483034.
3
Japanese-English language equivalence of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument among Japanese-Americans.日裔美国人中认知能力筛查工具的日英语言等效性。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2009 Feb;21(1):129-37. doi: 10.1017/S1041610208007862. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
4
Composite scores for executive function items: demographic heterogeneity and relationships with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.执行功能项目的综合得分:人口统计学异质性及其与定量磁共振成像的关系。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008 Sep;14(5):746-59. doi: 10.1017/S1355617708081162.
5
Item response theory facilitated cocalibrating cognitive tests and reduced bias in estimated rates of decline.项目反应理论有助于共同校准认知测试,并减少估计衰退率中的偏差。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;61(10):1018-27.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.011. Epub 2008 May 5.
6
A comparison of three sets of criteria for determining the presence of differential item functioning using ordinal logistic regression.使用有序逻辑回归确定差异项目功能存在的三组标准的比较。
Qual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:69-84. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9185-5. Epub 2007 Jun 7.
7
Differential item functioning impact in a modified version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷修订版中的项目功能差异影响
Qual Life Res. 2007 Aug;16(6):981-90. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9200-x. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
8
Rapid detection of differential item functioning in assessments of health-related quality of life: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy.在癌症治疗功能评估中快速检测健康相关生活质量评估中的项目功能差异:癌症治疗功能评估。
Qual Life Res. 2007 Feb;16(1):101-14. doi: 10.1007/s11136-006-0035-7. Epub 2006 Nov 17.
9
Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework.自我报告工具能否在不同人群组之间进行有意义的比较?使用验证性因素分析框架检验测量不变性。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S78-94. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245454.12228.8f.
10
Identification of measurement differences between English and Spanish language versions of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Detecting differential item functioning using MIMIC modeling.《简易精神状态检查表》英文和西班牙文版本测量差异的识别。使用MIMIC模型检测项目功能差异。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S124-33. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245250.50114.0f.

lordif:一个用于使用迭代混合有序逻辑回归/项目反应理论和蒙特卡罗模拟检测项目功能差异的R包。

lordif: An R Package for Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Iterative Hybrid Ordinal Logistic Regression/Item Response Theory and Monte Carlo Simulations.

作者信息

Choi Seung W, Gibbons Laura E, Crane Paul K

机构信息

Northwestern University.

出版信息

J Stat Softw. 2011 Mar 1;39(8):1-30. doi: 10.18637/jss.v039.i08.

DOI:10.18637/jss.v039.i08
PMID:21572908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3093114/
Abstract

Logistic regression provides a flexible framework for detecting various types of differential item functioning (DIF). Previous efforts extended the framework by using item response theory (IRT) based trait scores, and by employing an iterative process using group-specific item parameters to account for DIF in the trait scores, analogous to purification approaches used in other DIF detection frameworks. The current investigation advances the technique by developing a computational platform integrating both statistical and IRT procedures into a single program. Furthermore, a Monte Carlo simulation approach was incorporated to derive empirical criteria for various DIF statistics and effect size measures. For purposes of illustration, the procedure was applied to data from a questionnaire of anxiety symptoms for detecting DIF associated with age from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.

摘要

逻辑回归为检测各类项目功能差异(DIF)提供了一个灵活的框架。以往的研究通过使用基于项目反应理论(IRT)的特质分数来扩展该框架,并采用一个使用特定组项目参数的迭代过程来解释特质分数中的DIF,这类似于其他DIF检测框架中使用的净化方法。当前的研究通过开发一个将统计程序和IRT程序集成到单个程序中的计算平台来推进这项技术。此外,还采用了蒙特卡罗模拟方法来推导各种DIF统计量和效应大小度量的经验标准。为了说明目的,该程序被应用于一份焦虑症状问卷的数据,以检测患者报告结局测量信息系统中与年龄相关的DIF。