Laland Kevin N, Odling-Smee John, Feldman Marcus W, Kendal Jeremy
School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Bute Building, Queens Terrace, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9TS, U.K. Tel. +44 1334 463568. Fax. +44 1334 463600.
Found Sci. 2009 Aug;14(3):195-216. doi: 10.1007/s10699-008-9153-8.
In spite of its success, Neo-Darwinism is faced with major conceptual barriers to further progress, deriving directly from its metaphysical foundations. Most importantly, neo-Darwinism fails to recognize a fundamental cause of evolutionary change, "niche construction". This failure restricts the generality of evolutionary theory, and introduces inaccuracies. It also hinders the integration of evolutionary biology with neighbouring disciplines, including ecosystem ecology, developmental biology, and the human sciences. Ecology is forced to become a divided discipline, developmental biology is stubbornly difficult to reconcile with evolutionary theory, and the majority of biologists and social scientists are still unhappy with evolutionary accounts of human behaviour. The incorporation of niche construction as both a cause and a product of evolution removes these disciplinary boundaries while greatly generalizing the explanatory power of evolutionary theory.
尽管新达尔文主义取得了成功,但它在进一步发展上面临着重大的概念障碍,这些障碍直接源于其形而上学基础。最重要的是,新达尔文主义未能认识到进化变化的一个根本原因——“生态位构建”。这种忽视限制了进化理论的普遍性,并引入了不准确之处。它还阻碍了进化生物学与邻近学科的整合,包括生态系统生态学、发育生物学和人文科学。生态学被迫成为一门分裂的学科,发育生物学很难与进化理论相协调,而且大多数生物学家和社会科学家仍然对人类行为的进化解释不满意。将生态位构建纳入进化的原因和产物,消除了这些学科界限,同时极大地扩展了进化理论的解释力。