Orthopaedic Department, Baoan People's Hospital, Shenzhen 518101, People's Republic of China.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Oct;131(10):1369-74. doi: 10.1007/s00402-011-1317-2. Epub 2011 May 15.
This retrospective study was to evaluate the relationship between osteoporosis and dynamic cervical plates in screw-plate or screw-bone interface of elderly cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients.
Retrospective study was conducted on elderly CSM patients, treated by anterior corpectomy and reconstruction with titanium mesh cages (TMC) and dynamic cervical plate between July 2004 and June 2007. All patients underwent bone mineral density (BMD) assessment in preoperation, and according to the osteoporosis degree they have been divided into two groups: moderate osteoporosis degree group and severe osteoporosis degree group. The clinical outcome [Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)], bone fusion assessment (CT mielogram), the change of titanium mesh cages and plate of cephalic screw-plate-angle (SPA) and cephalic endplate-plate-angle (EPA) of plain X-ray films were measured.
The mean JOA score and recovery rate were not different between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no loss of sagittal alignment after surgery in any patient, and no significant difference between both groups on lordosis measurements (P > 0.05). Although there was a significant difference of the cage subsidence rate between the two groups (P < 0.001), all patients had favorable bone union and none required additional treatment. The average changes of SPA were greater in A group patients than in B group patients, while the variation of EPA was higher in B group patients than in A group patients (P < 0.001).
Despite the fact that there is a significant difference of the cage subsidence rate between the two groups no clinical outcome, nor sagittal alignment or fusion rate differences among groups was observed in elderly CSM patients.
本回顾性研究旨在评估骨质疏松症与老年颈椎病患者螺钉-板或螺钉-骨界面中动态颈椎板之间的关系。
对 2004 年 7 月至 2007 年 6 月接受前路椎体次全切除钛网笼(TMC)和动态颈椎板重建治疗的老年颈椎病患者进行回顾性研究。所有患者在术前均进行骨密度(BMD)评估,并根据骨质疏松程度分为两组:中度骨质疏松组和重度骨质疏松组。测量临床结果[日本矫形协会评分(JOA)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)]、骨融合评估(CT 髓核造影)、钛网笼和头侧螺钉-板角(SPA)、头侧终板-板角(EPA)的变化。
两组间平均 JOA 评分和恢复率无差异(P > 0.05)。术后所有患者矢状位排列均无丢失,两组间后凸测量无显著差异(P > 0.05)。尽管两组间笼沉降率有显著差异(P < 0.001),但所有患者均有良好的骨融合,无需额外治疗。A 组患者 SPA 的平均变化大于 B 组,而 B 组患者 EPA 的变化大于 A 组(P < 0.001)。
尽管两组间笼沉降率有显著差异,但老年颈椎病患者的临床结果、矢状位排列或融合率无差异。