Suppr超能文献

蛋白质-纳米颗粒相互作用中的静电选择性。

Electrostatic selectivity in protein-nanoparticle interactions.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Biomacromolecules. 2011 Jul 11;12(7):2552-61. doi: 10.1021/bm200374e. Epub 2011 Jun 13.

Abstract

The binding of bovine serum albumin (BSA) and β-lactoglobulin (BLG) to TTMA (a cationic gold nanoparticle coupled to 3,6,9,12-tetraoxatricosan-1-aminium, 23-mercapto-N,N,N-trimethyl) was studied by high-resolution turbidimetry (to observe a critical pH for binding), dynamic light scattering (to monitor particle growth), and isothermal titration calorimetry (to measure binding energetics), all as a function of pH and ionic strength. Distinctively higher affinities observed for BLG versus BSA, despite the lower pI of the latter, were explained in terms of their different charge anisotropies, namely, the negative charge patch of BLG. To confirm this effect, we studied two isoforms of BLG that differ in only two amino acids. Significantly stronger binding to BLGA could be attributed to the presence of the additional aspartates in the negative charge domain for the BLG dimer, best portrayed in DelPhi. This selectivity decreases at low ionic strength, at which both isoforms bind well below pI. Selectivity increases with ionic strength for BLG versus BSA, which binds above pI. This result points to the diminished role of long-range repulsions for binding above pI. Dynamic light scattering reveals a tendency for higher-order aggregation for TTMA-BSA at pH above the pI of BSA, due to its ability to bridge nanoparticles. In contrast, soluble BLG-TTMA complexes were stable over a range of pH because the charge anisotropy of this protein at makes it unable to bridge nanoparticles. Finally, isothermal titration calorimetry shows endoenthalpic binding for all proteins: the higher affinity of TTMA for BLGA versus BLGB comes from a difference in the dominant entropy term.

摘要

牛血清白蛋白(BSA)和β-乳球蛋白(BLG)与 TTMA(与 3,6,9,12-四氧杂三癸烷-1-氨基,23-巯基-N,N,N-三甲基结合的阳离子金纳米粒子)的结合通过高分辨率浊度法(观察结合的临界 pH 值)、动态光散射(监测颗粒生长)和等温热滴定法(测量结合能)进行研究,所有这些都是作为 pH 和离子强度的函数。尽管 BSA 的等电点较低,但与 BSA 相比,BLG 的亲和力明显更高,这可以用它们不同的电荷各向异性来解释,即 BLG 的负电荷斑。为了证实这一效应,我们研究了两种仅在两个氨基酸上有所不同的 BLG 同工型。BLGA 与 BLG 结合能力更强,可以归因于 BLG 二聚体的负电荷域中存在额外的天冬氨酸,这在 DelPhi 中得到了最好的描绘。在低离子强度下,这种选择性降低,两种同工型的结合都低于等电点。对于 BLG 与 BSA 而言,随着离子强度的增加,结合选择性增加,BSA 的结合高于等电点。这一结果表明,在高于等电点时,长程斥力在结合中的作用减弱。动态光散射表明,由于 TTMA 能够桥连纳米粒子,因此在高于 BSA 等电点的 pH 值下,TTMA-BSA 有形成高级聚集的趋势。相比之下,由于该蛋白质的电荷各向异性使其无法桥连纳米粒子,因此 BLG-TTMA 复合物在 pH 值范围内是稳定的。最后,等温热滴定法表明所有蛋白质的结合都是内焓的:TTMA 对 BLGA 与 BLGB 的亲和力更高,是由于主要的熵项不同所致。

相似文献

1
Electrostatic selectivity in protein-nanoparticle interactions.蛋白质-纳米颗粒相互作用中的静电选择性。
Biomacromolecules. 2011 Jul 11;12(7):2552-61. doi: 10.1021/bm200374e. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
2
Effect of charge regulation and ion-dipole interactions on the selectivity of protein-nanoparticle binding.
Langmuir. 2014 Apr 15;30(14):4078-83. doi: 10.1021/la500027f. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
8
Protein-selective coacervation with hyaluronic acid.与透明质酸的蛋白选择性凝聚。
Biomacromolecules. 2014 Mar 10;15(3):726-34. doi: 10.1021/bm500041a. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
9
Effect of heparin on protein aggregation: inhibition versus promotion.肝素对蛋白质聚集的影响:抑制与促进。
Biomacromolecules. 2012 May 14;13(5):1642-51. doi: 10.1021/bm3003539. Epub 2012 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
Size and geometry dependent protein-nanoparticle self-assembly.
Chem Commun (Camb). 2009 Apr 28(16):2157-9. doi: 10.1039/b900552h. Epub 2009 Mar 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验