• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜单孔胆囊切除术:一项随机对照研究。

Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study.

作者信息

Zheng Mingwei, Qin Mingfang, Zhao Hongzhi

机构信息

Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2012 Mar;21(2):113-7. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2011.577787. Epub 2011 May 16.

DOI:10.3109/13645706.2011.577787
PMID:21574826
Abstract

This study reports the initial experience with laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) cholecystectomy and compares it with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) through a randomized controlled trial. Sixty selective patients diagnosed with cholelithiasis or polyp lesion of the gallbladder (PLG) were randomly divided into two groups undergoing either LESS cholecystectomy or LC separately. The clinical data about operations and recovery of the two groups were compared. In the LESS group 28 of 30 patients underwent LESS cholecystectomy successfully and the remaining two (6.7%) were converted to standard laparoscopic surgery. LC was successfully performed in all patients in the control group. Mean operative time of LESS cholecystectomy group and LC group was 55.6 ± 25.7 versus 42.7 ± 18.6 (p < 0.05). Mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.7 ± 1.3 versus 3.8 ± 0.8 days (p < 0.05). Mean pain index was 2.8 ± 0.6 versus 3.7 ± 1.1 (p < 0.05). A questionnaire revealed that the mean scores of satisfaction with the operation were 8.9 ± 0.7 versus 8.1 ± 1.5 (p < 0.05). LESS cholecystectomy is safe, feasible, minimally invasive, and cosmetic. It is a reasonable alternative to selective patients with uncomplicated cholelithiasis and PLG. But larger controlled studies are still needed.

摘要

本研究报告了经自然腔道内镜手术(LESS)行胆囊切除术的初步经验,并通过一项随机对照试验将其与腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)进行比较。60例被诊断为胆囊结石或胆囊息肉样病变(PLG)的择期患者被随机分为两组,分别接受LESS胆囊切除术或LC。比较两组的手术及恢复情况的临床数据。LESS组30例患者中28例成功接受了LESS胆囊切除术,其余2例(6.7%)中转至标准腹腔镜手术。对照组所有患者均成功实施了LC。LESS胆囊切除术组和LC组的平均手术时间分别为55.6±25.7分钟和42.7±18.6分钟(p<0.05)。术后平均住院时间分别为3.7±1.3天和3.8±0.8天(p<0.05)。平均疼痛指数分别为2.8±0.6和3.7±1.1(p<0.05)。一项问卷调查显示,对手术的满意度平均得分分别为8.9±0.7和8.1±1.5(p<0.05)。LESS胆囊切除术安全、可行、微创且美观。对于患有单纯性胆囊结石和PLG的择期患者而言,它是一种合理的替代选择。但仍需要更大规模的对照研究。

相似文献

1
Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study.腹腔镜单孔胆囊切除术:一项随机对照研究。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2012 Mar;21(2):113-7. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2011.577787. Epub 2011 May 16.
2
Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study.腹腔镜单部位(LESS)与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的随机前瞻性研究。
J Surg Res. 2011 Apr;166(2):e109-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.11.885. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
3
Comparison of postoperative pain between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective case-control study.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后疼痛的比较:前瞻性病例对照研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Feb;22(1):25-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318242ea44.
4
Combined laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: initial experience of a single center.腹腔镜单孔联合手术:单中心的初步经验
Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Jun;59(116):986-9. doi: 10.5754/hge12245.
5
Interim report: a randomized controlled trial comparing postoperative pain in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.中期报告:一项比较单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后疼痛的随机对照试验。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013 Feb;6(1):14-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5910.2012.00154.x. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
6
Single-port versus needlescopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study.单孔腹腔镜与针式腹腔镜对比传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项对比研究。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2011 Aug;4(3):120-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5910.2011.00087.x. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
7
Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Am J Surg. 2011 Sep;202(3):254-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.12.009.
8
Laparoendoscopic single site surgery can be performed completely with standard equipment.腹腔镜单孔手术可以使用标准设备完全完成。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Aug;21(4):292-4. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31822474a4.
9
Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with uncomplicated gallbladder disease: a meta-analysis.单纯性胆囊疾病患者单孔与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的Meta分析
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Dec;22(6):487-97. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182685d0a.
10
Mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy.迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术对比
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jun;15(6):614-8. doi: 10.1007/s004640000316. Epub 2000 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy conventional multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项随机对照试验的系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析
F1000Res. 2024 Nov 18;11:754. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.122102.1. eCollection 2022.
2
Midline incisional hernia guidelines: the European Hernia Society.中线切口疝指南:欧洲疝学会
Br J Surg. 2023 Nov 9;110(12):1732-1768. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad284.
3
Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a current meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
单孔与传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Oct;34(10):4315-4329. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07198-8. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
4
Incidence of incisional hernias following single-incision versus traditional laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis.单切口与传统腹腔镜手术后切口疝发生率的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2019 Feb;23(1):91-100. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1853-6. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
5
Higher cost of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to longer operating time. A study of opportunity cost based on meta-analysis.单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术因手术时间较长导致成本更高。一项基于荟萃分析的机会成本研究。
G Chir. 2018 Jan-Feb;39(1):24-34. doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.1.024.
6
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is responsible for increased adverse events: results of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与不良事件增加相关:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析结果。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Sep;32(9):3739-3753. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6143-y. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
7
Prospective randomized study comparing single-incision laparoscopic versus multi-trocar laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair at 2 years.前瞻性随机研究比较单切口腹腔镜与多孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术 2 年的疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3262-3272. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6045-z. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
8
Single-incision surgery trocar-site hernia: an updated systematic review meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis by the Minimally Invasive Surgery Synthesis of Interventions Outcomes Network (MISSION).单切口手术套管疝:由微创外科综合干预结果网络(MISSION)进行的更新系统评价荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):14-23. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5717-4. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
9
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Less scar, less pain.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:疤痕更少,疼痛更轻。
J Minim Access Surg. 2017 Apr-Jun;13(2):118-123. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.186686.
10
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does it work? A systematic review.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:可行吗?一项系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4389-99. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4757-5. Epub 2016 Feb 19.