Suppr超能文献

不同剂量利妥昔单抗治疗天疱疮的临床疗效:27 例回顾性研究。

Clinical efficacy of different doses of rituximab in the treatment of pemphigus: a retrospective study of 27 patients.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, 712 Eonjuro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-720, Korea.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2011 Sep;165(3):646-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10411.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The treatment of pemphigus is still challenging and some patients with pemphigus are unresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive treatments. Rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, binds to the CD20 antigen on the surface of B cells and has been reported to be effective for the treatment of recalcitrant pemphigus.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of different doses of rituximab in patients with pemphigus who were unresponsive to conventional therapies.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with pemphigus who received different doses of rituximab (375 mg m(-2) per infusion weekly) were analysed retrospectively. We divided the patients into two groups: group 1 (n = 12) received two infusions of rituximab and group 2 (n = 15) received three or more infusions of rituximab at 1-week intervals. The number of infusions was determined by the choice of each patient. The endpoints of the study were time to disease control, partial remission (PR) and complete remission (CR).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in time to achieve PR between the two groups (147 vs. 135 days, P = 0·65). However, group 2 demonstrated better outcomes than group 1 in time to CR (443 vs. 149 days, P = 0·06) and relapse rate (0% vs. 67%, P < 0·01).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that three or more infusions of rituximab are more effective than two infusions for the treatment of pemphigus.

摘要

背景

天疱疮的治疗仍然具有挑战性,一些天疱疮患者对常规免疫抑制治疗无反应。利妥昔单抗,一种嵌合型单克隆抗 CD20 抗体,与 B 细胞表面的 CD20 抗原结合,已被报道对复发性天疱疮的治疗有效。

目的

比较不同剂量利妥昔单抗治疗对常规治疗无反应的天疱疮患者的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析 27 例接受不同剂量利妥昔单抗(每周 375mg/m² 输注一次)治疗的天疱疮患者。我们将患者分为两组:组 1(n=12)接受两次利妥昔单抗输注,组 2(n=15)接受三次或更多次利妥昔单抗输注,间隔 1 周。输注次数由每位患者的选择决定。研究的终点是疾病控制时间、部分缓解(PR)和完全缓解(CR)。

结果

两组达到 PR 的时间无显著差异(147 天 vs. 135 天,P=0.65)。然而,组 2 在达到 CR 的时间(443 天 vs. 149 天,P=0.06)和复发率(0% vs. 67%,P<0.01)方面的结果优于组 1。

结论

我们得出结论,三次或更多次利妥昔单抗输注比两次输注更有效地治疗天疱疮。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验