• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 65 岁及以上患者无症状与有症状左心室功能障碍的特征和结局(来自心血管健康研究)。

Comparison of characteristics and outcomes of asymptomatic versus symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction in subjects 65 years old or older (from the Cardiovascular Health Study).

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2011 Jun 1;107(11):1667-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.01.051.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.01.051
PMID:21575752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4143416/
Abstract

Although asymptomatic left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (ALVSD) is common, its phenotype and prognosis for incident heart failure (HF) and mortality are insufficiently understood. Echocardiography was done in 5,649 participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study (age 73.0 ± 5.6 years, 57.6% women). The clinical characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors of the participants with ALVSD were compared to those with normal LV function (ejection fraction ≥55%) and with symptomatic LV systolic dysfunction (SLVSD; ejection fraction <55% and a history of HF). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of incident HF and mortality in those with ALVSD. Also, comparisons were made among the LV ejection fraction subgroups using previously validated cutoff values (<45% and 45% to 55%), adjusting for the demographic and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Those with ALVSD (7.3%) were more likely to have cardiovascular risk factors than those in the reference group (without LV dysfunction or symptomatic HF) but less likely than those with SLVSD. The HF rate was 24 occurrences per 1,000 person-years in the reference group and 57 occurrences per 1,000 person-years in those with ALVSD. The HF rate was 45 occurrences per 1,000 person-years for those with ALVSD and mildly impaired LV dysfunction and 93 occurrences per 1,000 person-years for those with ALVSD and moderate to severe LV dysfunction. The mortality rate was 51 deaths per 1,000 person-years in the reference group, 90 deaths per 1,000 person-years in the ALVSD group, and 156 deaths per 1,000 person-years in the SLVSD group. Adjusting for covariates, compared to the reference group, ALVSD was associated with an increased risk of incident HF (hazard ratio 1.60, 95% confidence interval 1.35 to 1.91), cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio 2.13, 95% confidence interval 1.81 to 2.51), and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.29 to 1.64). In conclusion, subjects with ALVSD are characterized by a greater prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and co-morbidities than those with normal LV function and without HF. However, the prevalence is lower than in those with SLVSD. Patients with ALVSD are at an increased risk of HF and mortality, particularly those with greater severity of LV impairment.

摘要

虽然无症状左心室(LV)收缩功能障碍(ALVSD)很常见,但它的表型以及发生心力衰竭(HF)和死亡的预后尚不清楚。在心血管健康研究(年龄 73.0±5.6 岁,57.6%为女性)的 5649 名参与者中进行了超声心动图检查。将 ALVSD 患者的临床特征和心血管危险因素与具有正常 LV 功能(射血分数≥55%)和有症状 LV 收缩功能障碍(SLVSD;射血分数<55%和有 HF 病史)的患者进行比较。使用 Cox 比例风险模型来估计 ALVSD 患者发生 HF 和死亡的风险。此外,还使用以前验证的截断值(<45%和 45%至 55%)在 LV 射血分数亚组之间进行比较,同时调整了人口统计学和心血管疾病危险因素。与参考组(无 LV 功能障碍或有症状 HF)相比,ALVSD 患者更有可能存在心血管危险因素,但比 SLVSD 患者的可能性小。参考组的 HF 发生率为每 1000 人年 24 例,ALVSD 患者为每 1000 人年 57 例。ALVSD 患者中,轻度 LV 功能障碍的 HF 发生率为每 1000 人年 45 例,中度至重度 LV 功能障碍的 HF 发生率为每 1000 人年 93 例。参考组的死亡率为每 1000 人年 51 例死亡,ALVSD 组为每 1000 人年 90 例死亡,SLVSD 组为每 1000 人年 156 例死亡。调整协变量后,与参考组相比,ALVSD 与 HF 事件风险增加相关(风险比 1.60,95%置信区间 1.35 至 1.91)、心血管死亡率(风险比 2.13,95%置信区间 1.81 至 2.51)和全因死亡率(风险比 1.46,95%置信区间 1.29 至 1.64)。总之,与正常 LV 功能且无 HF 的患者相比,ALVSD 患者的心血管危险因素和合并症更为常见。然而,其患病率低于 SLVSD 患者。ALVSD 患者发生 HF 和死亡的风险增加,尤其是那些 LV 损伤程度更严重的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8642/4143416/2db0e21674cc/nihms458374f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8642/4143416/f09e9c08f850/nihms458374f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8642/4143416/7cfad7417845/nihms458374f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8642/4143416/2db0e21674cc/nihms458374f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8642/4143416/f09e9c08f850/nihms458374f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8642/4143416/7cfad7417845/nihms458374f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8642/4143416/2db0e21674cc/nihms458374f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of characteristics and outcomes of asymptomatic versus symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction in subjects 65 years old or older (from the Cardiovascular Health Study).比较 65 岁及以上患者无症状与有症状左心室功能障碍的特征和结局(来自心血管健康研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Jun 1;107(11):1667-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.01.051.
2
Is mild asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction always predictive of adverse events in high-risk populations? Insights from the DAVID-Berg study.无症状性左心室收缩功能障碍是否总是能预测高危人群的不良事件?来自 DAVID-Berg 研究的见解。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Nov;20(11):1540-1548. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1298. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
3
Prognosis of individuals with asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA).动脉粥样硬化多民族研究(MESA)中无症状左心室收缩功能障碍个体的预后。
Circulation. 2012 Dec 4;126(23):2713-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.112201. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
4
Assessing the Risk of Progression From Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Dysfunction to Overt Heart Failure: A Systematic Overview and Meta-Analysis.评估无症状左心室功能障碍进展为显性心力衰竭的风险:系统综述和荟萃分析。
JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Apr;4(4):237-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.09.015. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
5
Asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in essential hypertension: prevalence, determinants, and prognostic value.原发性高血压患者无症状性左心室收缩功能障碍:患病率、决定因素及预后价值。
Hypertension. 2005 Mar;45(3):412-8. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000154822.37141.f6. Epub 2005 Jan 17.
6
Right atrial volume index in chronic systolic heart failure and prognosis.慢性收缩性心力衰竭患者的右心房容积指数与预后
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 May;2(5):527-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.01.012.
7
Detection of subtle left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with significant aortic regurgitation and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: speckle tracking echocardiographic analysis.检测伴有严重主动脉瓣反流和保留左心室射血分数的患者的细微左心室收缩功能障碍:斑点追踪超声心动图分析。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Sep;16(9):992-9. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev019. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
8
Prevalence and prognosis of asymptomatic left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in ambulatory patients with coronary heart disease.冠心病门诊患者无症状左心室舒张功能障碍的患病率及预后
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jun 15;99(12):1643-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.041. Epub 2007 Apr 27.
9
[Screening for asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in high-risk patients. Preliminary experience with a program based on the use of ECG and natriuretic peptide].[高危患者无症状性左心室收缩功能障碍的筛查。基于心电图和利钠肽检测的项目初步经验]
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2008 Dec;9(12):835-43.
10
Usefulness of plasma galectin-3 levels in systolic heart failure to predict renal insufficiency and survival.心力衰竭患者血浆半乳糖凝集素-3 水平对预测肾功能不全及生存的价值。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Aug 1;108(3):385-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.056. Epub 2011 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Transition from asymptomatic to symptomatic systolic chronic heart failure: rationale and design of TransitionCHF.从无症状到有症状的收缩性慢性心力衰竭的转变:TransitionCHF 的原理和设计。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Aug;11(4):2366-2378. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14783. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
2
Cardiac Hepatopathy: New Perspectives on Old Problems through a Prism of Endogenous Metabolic Regulations by Hepatokines.心性肝病:通过肝细胞因子内源性代谢调节视角对老问题的新见解。
Antioxidants (Basel). 2023 Feb 17;12(2):516. doi: 10.3390/antiox12020516.
3
Does the Measurement of Ejection Fraction Still Make Sense in the HFpEF Framework? What Recent Trials Suggest.在射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)框架下,射血分数测量是否仍有意义?近期试验的启示。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 15;12(2):693. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020693.
4
Retrospective Study of the Association Between Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome on Admission to a Rural Referral Center in East Java, Indonesia, and the Incidence of New Symptomatic Heart Failure at 6 Months.印度尼西亚东爪哇农村转诊中心急性冠脉综合征患者入院时血小板与淋巴细胞比值与 6 个月时新发有症状心力衰竭发生率的回顾性研究
Med Sci Monit. 2022 Mar 2;28:e935002. doi: 10.12659/MSM.935002.
5
Peripheral endothelial dysfunction is a novel risk factor for systolic dysfunction and heart failure progression.外周血管内皮功能障碍是收缩功能障碍和心力衰竭进展的一个新的危险因素。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Jul 23;30:100584. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100584. eCollection 2020 Oct.
6
Asymptomatic Left Ventricle Systolic Dysfunction.无症状性左心室收缩功能障碍
Eur Cardiol. 2020 Apr 4;15:e13. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2019.14. eCollection 2020 Feb.
7
Prognostic Significance of Echocardiographic Measures of Cardiac Remodeling.心脏重塑的超声心动图测量的预后意义
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020 Jan;33(1):72-81.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
8
Predictors and outcomes of heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction.射血分数中间值的心衰的预测因子和结局。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Apr;20(4):651-659. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1091. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
9
Prognosis of Adults With Borderline Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.左心室射血分数临界的成人患者的预后
JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Jun;4(6):502-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.03.003.
10
Prevalence and prognostic value of subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction by global longitudinal strain in a community-based cohort.基于社区队列中整体纵向应变评估亚临床左心室收缩功能障碍的患病率及预后价值
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Dec;16(12):1301-9. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.154. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and prognosis of heart failure in the elderly.老年人心力衰竭的流行病学、病理生理学及预后
Heart Fail Clin. 2007 Oct;3(4):381-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2007.07.004.
2
Prognosis of all-cause heart failure and borderline left ventricular systolic dysfunction: 5 year mortality follow-up of the Echocardiographic Heart of England Screening Study (ECHOES).全因性心力衰竭和临界左心室收缩功能障碍的预后:英格兰超声心动图心脏筛查研究(ECHOES)的5年死亡率随访
Eur Heart J. 2007 May;28(9):1128-34. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm102. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
3
ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure).美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会成人慢性心力衰竭诊断和管理指南2005年更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组(更新2001年心力衰竭评估和管理指南写作委员会)报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Sep 20;46(6):e1-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.022.
4
Natural history of asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the community.社区中无症状左心室收缩功能障碍的自然病史。
Circulation. 2003 Aug 26;108(8):977-82. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000085166.44904.79. Epub 2003 Aug 11.
5
The epidemiology of "asymptomatic" left ventricular systolic dysfunction: implications for screening.“无症状”左心室收缩功能障碍的流行病学:对筛查的启示
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jun 3;138(11):907-16. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-11-200306030-00012.
6
Burden of systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction in the community: appreciating the scope of the heart failure epidemic.社区中收缩期和舒张期心室功能障碍的负担:认识心力衰竭流行的范围。
JAMA. 2003 Jan 8;289(2):194-202. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.2.194.
7
Outcome of congestive heart failure in elderly persons: influence of left ventricular systolic function. The Cardiovascular Health Study.老年人充血性心力衰竭的结局:左心室收缩功能的影响。心血管健康研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Oct 15;137(8):631-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-8-200210150-00006.
8
Cross sectional study estimating prevalence of heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction in community patients at risk.横断面研究评估有风险的社区患者中心力衰竭和左心室收缩功能障碍的患病率。
Heart. 2001 Aug;86(2):172-8. doi: 10.1136/heart.86.2.172.
9
Predictors of congestive heart failure in the elderly: the Cardiovascular Health Study.老年人充血性心力衰竭的预测因素:心血管健康研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 May;35(6):1628-37. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00582-9.
10
Congestive heart failure in subjects with normal versus reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: prevalence and mortality in a population-based cohort.左心室射血分数正常与降低的受试者中的充血性心力衰竭:基于人群队列的患病率和死亡率
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Jun;33(7):1948-55. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00118-7.