• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与单独锁骨下阻滞相比,同时行锁骨下加远端正中、桡侧和尺侧神经阻滞可加速上肢麻醉,并提高阻滞的一致性。

Concomitant infraclavicular plus distal median, radial, and ulnar nerve blockade accelerates upper extremity anaesthesia and improves block consistency compared with infraclavicular block alone.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Epsom, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2011 Aug;107(2):236-42. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer101. Epub 2011 May 15.

DOI:10.1093/bja/aer101
PMID:21576095
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study tested the hypothesis that a combined ultrasound-guided block of the infraclavicular brachial plexus plus distal median, radial, and ulnar nerves would accelerate upper extremity anaesthesia compared with infraclavicular block alone.

METHODS

Elective wrist and hand surgery patients were randomly assigned to receive 42 ml infraclavicular lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine 1/200,000 ('infraclavicular only'; n=30) or 30 ml lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine 1/200,000 followed by a distal median, radial, and ulnar nerve block using 12 ml 50:50 lidocaine 2%+ropivacaine 0.75% ('combined'; n=31). A blinded observer assessed pinprick sensory and motor block in the four distal nerve territories at 10 and 15 min (each nerve/parameter: no block, 3, to complete block, 0).

RESULTS

Total aggregate block score (sensory+motor) was reduced in the combined group at 15 min [mean (95% confidence interval)=6.7 (5.3-8.1) vs. 9.9 (7.9-11.9), mean difference (95% confidence interval)=3.2 (0.81-5.6), P=0.01], and corresponded to an estimated onset effect time benefit of 6 min (∼40% treatment effect). The combined group also demonstrated reduced variance about the mean (sd=3.7 vs. 5.4, P=0.046). Mean (sd) total block score (sensory+motor) was significantly reduced at 15 min in the combined group for each individual nerve [median, radial, ulnar, respectively: 1.4 (1.1) vs. 2.4 (1.5), P=0.005; 1.2 (1.1) vs. 2.0 (1.5), P=0.03; 1.6 (1.3) vs. 2.5 (1.6), P=0.03].

CONCLUSIONS

At an approximately equivalent total local anaesthetic dose, a combined infraclavicular block plus distal median, radial, and ulnar nerve blockade accelerates anaesthesia onset time and improves block consistency compared with an infraclavicular block alone.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY

ANZCTR: ACTRN12610000155099. https://www.anzctr.org.au/registry/trial_review.aspx?ID=335162.

摘要

背景

本前瞻性、随机、观察者盲法研究旨在检验以下假设,即与单纯锁骨下神经阻滞相比,联合超声引导下锁骨下臂丛神经加远端正中神经、桡神经和尺神经阻滞可加速上肢麻醉。

方法

择期腕关节和手部手术患者被随机分配接受 42ml 含 1/200000 肾上腺素的 1.5% 利多卡因(“单纯锁骨下阻滞”组,n=30)或 30ml 含 1/200000 肾上腺素的 1.5% 利多卡因,然后进行远端正中神经、桡神经和尺神经阻滞,使用 12ml 50:50 利多卡因 2%+罗哌卡因 0.75%(“联合阻滞”组,n=31)。盲法观察者在 10 分钟和 15 分钟评估四个远端神经区域的针刺痛觉和运动阻滞情况(每个神经/参数:无阻滞,3 分;完全阻滞,0 分)。

结果

联合阻滞组在 15 分钟时的总综合阻滞评分(感觉+运动)降低[平均(95%置信区间)=6.7(5.3-8.1)vs. 9.9(7.9-11.9),平均差异(95%置信区间)=3.2(0.81-5.6),P=0.01],这与估计的起效时间优势 6 分钟相对应(约 40%的治疗效果)。联合阻滞组的平均差异也较小(标准差=3.7 对 5.4,P=0.046)。联合阻滞组在 15 分钟时每个单独神经的总阻滞评分(感觉+运动)均显著降低[分别为:正中神经、桡神经、尺神经:1.4(1.1)vs. 2.4(1.5),P=0.005;1.2(1.1)vs. 2.0(1.5),P=0.03;1.6(1.3)vs. 2.5(1.6),P=0.03]。

结论

在等效的局部麻醉剂总剂量下,与单纯锁骨下阻滞相比,锁骨下联合阻滞加远端正中神经、桡神经和尺神经阻滞可加速麻醉起效时间,并改善阻滞的一致性。

临床试验注册

澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心:ACTRN12610000155099。https://www.anzctr.org.au/registry/trial_review.aspx?ID=335162。

相似文献

1
Concomitant infraclavicular plus distal median, radial, and ulnar nerve blockade accelerates upper extremity anaesthesia and improves block consistency compared with infraclavicular block alone.与单独锁骨下阻滞相比,同时行锁骨下加远端正中、桡侧和尺侧神经阻滞可加速上肢麻醉,并提高阻滞的一致性。
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Aug;107(2):236-42. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer101. Epub 2011 May 15.
2
Can we gain an advantage by combining distal median, radial and ulnar nerve blocks with supraclavicular block? A randomized controlled study.将正中神经远端、桡神经和尺神经阻滞与锁骨上阻滞联合应用能否带来优势?一项随机对照研究。
J Anesth. 2015 Apr;29(2):217-22. doi: 10.1007/s00540-014-1894-7. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
3
Does motor block related to long-acting brachial plexus block cause patient dissatisfaction after minor wrist and hand surgery? A randomized observer-blinded trial.长效臂丛神经阻滞相关的运动阻滞是否会导致小腕关节和手部手术后患者不满意?一项随机观察者盲法试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2012 Nov;109(5):809-15. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes266. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
4
Double-injection technique assisted by a nerve stimulator for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block results in better distal sensory-motor block: A randomised controlled trial.神经刺激器引导锁骨上臂丛阻滞的双注射技术可实现更好的远侧感觉-运动阻滞:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Mar;34(3):127-134. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000542.
5
Speed of onset of 'corner pocket supraclavicular' and infraclavicular ultrasound guided brachial plexus block: a randomised observer-blinded comparison.“锁骨上拐角入路”与锁骨下入路超声引导臂丛神经阻滞的起效速度:一项随机、观察者盲法比较研究
Anaesthesia. 2009 Jul;64(7):738-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05918.x.
6
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular vs infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks in children.超声引导下儿童锁骨上与锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞
Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Sep;18(9):838-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02644.x. Epub 2008 Jun 9.
7
Minimum volume of local anaesthetic required to surround each of the constituent nerves of the axillary brachial plexus, using ultrasound guidance: a pilot study.在超声引导下,环绕腋臂丛各组成神经所需的局部麻醉剂最小体积:一项初步研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2010 May;104(5):633-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq050. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
8
A randomized comparison between costoclavicular and paracoracoid ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block for upper limb surgery.锁骨下与肋锁突下入路超声引导锁骨下臂丛阻滞用于上肢手术的随机对照比较。
Can J Anaesth. 2017 Jun;64(6):617-625. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0842-z. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
9
[Optimal dose of local anesthetic mixture in ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block via coracoid approach: analysis of 160 cases].[超声引导下经喙突入路锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞局部麻醉混合液的最佳剂量:160例分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Feb 24;89(7):449-52.
10
A prospective, randomized comparison between single- and double-injection ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block.一项前瞻性、随机对照研究比较了单次和双次注射超声引导下锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):16-21. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181c7717c.

引用本文的文献

1
Can We Perform Distal Nerve Block Instead of Brachial Plexus Nerve Block Under Ultrasound Guidance for Hand Surgery?在超声引导下进行手部手术时,我们能否用远端神经阻滞替代臂丛神经阻滞?
Eurasian J Med. 2016 Oct;48(3):167-171. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2016.0256.
2
Ultrasound guided distal peripheral nerve block of the upper limb: A technical review.上肢超声引导下远端周围神经阻滞:技术综述
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jul-Sep;31(3):296-307. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.161654.
3
Can we gain an advantage by combining distal median, radial and ulnar nerve blocks with supraclavicular block? A randomized controlled study.
将正中神经远端、桡神经和尺神经阻滞与锁骨上阻滞联合应用能否带来优势?一项随机对照研究。
J Anesth. 2015 Apr;29(2):217-22. doi: 10.1007/s00540-014-1894-7. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
4
A triple-masked, randomized controlled trial comparing ultrasound-guided brachial plexus and distal peripheral nerve block anesthesia for outpatient hand surgery.一项三盲随机对照试验,比较超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞和远端周围神经阻滞麻醉用于门诊手部手术的效果。
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2014;2014:324083. doi: 10.1155/2014/324083. Epub 2014 Apr 15.